If the BoE was truly into the NWO / one currency...wouldn't they be on the Euro and not still on the Pound?
If you were tasked with accomplishing something and Margaret Thatcher had blocked you (or whatever the reason the UK didn't join the Euro), does that mean you weren't still tasked with a certain goal.
Also isn't it better to make all varied attempts fail in unison to give the appearance that the free market failed, i.e. that central banking is part of the free market, and hide that it was a grand manipulation.
Actually I concur that central banking was a natural outcome given there was no solution to the Byzantine Generals problem, but that is a deeper explanation than I feel like making right now. But just because it was natural doesn't exclude that there are vested conspiratorial interests riding and guiding it. By definition of the power vacuum we know there must be vested interests. The only debate is whether these vested interests are piecemeal and were ignorant of coming implosion, or whether they were conspiratorial (coordinating) students of history and knew damn well what they are guiding. I see too much order to accept the former. I mean if I could predict they would discredit themselves, then surely there were some within their Bilderberg and Trilateralist ranks who were smart enough to foresee.
I am not naming any names so I have no obligation to prove it in a court-of-law. I try to raise awareness of the potential threat to our freedom. I only hope to influence our actions. I am not after the goal of putting any blame on individuals of such a conspiracy.
P.S. the short reply would be that this is just more of the Hegelian dialectic modus operandi of the elite. Meaning they create the good vs. evil mirage, when in fact these are two heads of the same monster.
