Trust System Abuse By Nullius

[nutildah]

It is a well known psychology of mobs. Vod starts it off with his frivolous rating, then Lauda joins in, then marlboroza, then Nullius, then Vod again, all content in the knowledge it will be much harder for them to be held accountable in the noise.

Do you honestly believe Vod's ratings for you have nothing to do with your ridiculous rating left for him? Don't bring up "but theymos said!!!" -- everybody here knows what theymos also said. I would say its too bad you don't have a single ally on this forum, but then you might also be part of a mob.

Yeah yeah, I know:

I am not here to be your friend.

You're here to win, we get it. What a great salesman.

If your sales suffer its because of your own attitude and actions. You'd have to be pretty dumb to not see how your actions in one section of the forum affect your reputation into other sections. I suppose this is the part where you say its not fair. You're right, its not fair. Life's not fair. Now buck up and stop bitching for a change.

Nobody's out to get you -- you keep getting yourself.

[TECSHARE]

It is a well known psychology of mobs. Vod starts it off with his frivolous rating, then Lauda joins in, then marlboroza, then Nullius, then Vod again, all content in the knowledge it will be much harder for them to be held accountable in the noise.

Do you honestly believe Vod's ratings for you have nothing to do with your ridiculous rating left for him? Don't bring up "but theymos said!!!" -- everybody here knows what theymos also said. I would say its too bad you don't have a single ally on this forum, but then you might also be part of a mob.

Yeah yeah, I know:

I am not here to be your friend.

You're here to win, we get it. What a great salesman.

If your sales suffer its because of your own attitude and actions. You'd have to be pretty dumb to not see how your actions in one section of the forum affect your reputation into other sections. I suppose this is the part where you say its not fair. You're right, its not fair. Life's not fair. Now buck up and stop bitching for a change.

Nobody's out to get you -- you keep getting yourself.

No, I think Vod left his ratings for me in retribution for negative rating him for something he absolutely deserved a negative rating for. Thanks for pointing out it is retribution. So you think doxing and threatening users with government reports is acceptable? You are really defending Vod on that? Strange flex but ok.

I know you want me to think I have no allies, but I have plenty regardless of what you believe you little mini sociopath. Do you care to share with us what substantiation you have for your accusations against me, of which both Vod's and Nullius's ratings are based on?

[DireWolfM14]

Hey DireWolfM14, where are those principles now eh?

Lol, the ones you claim I sold to become a member of the mob?

My principals dictate that I refrain from engaging in personal disputes which have gotten so heated that neither side can discuss the situation reasonably and rationally.  I recon this is one such situation.  So, I won't be asking for anyone to substantiate anything they say in this tread, because there is very little substance to either side of the argument.

Besides, I know what you're really up to.  You're trying to bully me into removing Vod from my inclusion list.  Ain't gonna happen.

[TMAN]

He hasn’t abused you. I’d be happy to show you some abuse if you do wish. nullius is excersising his right to tag you for being a cunt. Count yourself lucky fella, close the thread and stop the attention whoring,

[TECSHARE]

He hasn’t abused you. I’d be happy to show you some abuse if you do wish. nullius is excersising his right to tag you for being a cunt. Count yourself lucky fella, close the thread and stop the attention whoring,

If that is what makes you feel better, have at it. Tagging some one for "being a cunt" is not a valid use of the trust system. Also, that is not what he tagged me for, if it was then maybe you would have a point. He might have tagged me for "being a cunt", but making up accusations because he doesn't like me is not an appropriate use of the trust system either now is it? Are you saying this tag is based in animus against me and not facts? I agree completely. I am not closing any thread, sorry. Unfortunately you will be seeing this thread for as long as it takes to have this false accusation neutralized, so enjoy the fruits of your labor. I am ready for the long haul. How about you?

[truth or dare]

He hasn’t abused you. I’d be happy to show you some abuse if you do wish. nullius is excersising his right to tag you for being a cunt. Count yourself lucky fella, close the thread and stop the attention whoring,

Threatening to abuse members should be grounds for deletion. Theymos could and should take this type of behavior seriously. Threatening to abuse another members account demonstrates that any position granted or gain to abuse from should be revoked.

Nullius has not only abused tecshares account, he has abused the ability of every member here by devaluing the trust systems usefulness. When you give a trusted trader a scam tag, you damage the credibility of the ratings and leave members more vulnerable to those that really do pose a financial threat to them when they are trading.

You should be removed from this forum. Bitcointalk is unlikely to ever benefit from any action that is within your limited capability. I am reading through your history here and your trust feedback is horrendous. Certainly considering you are apparently a default trust member.

Nullius account appears to be abusing the trust feedback of those most outspoken with regard lauda. How interesting.

[TMAN]

We should just let him throw his temper tantrums and stop responding to his cries for attention

good call dude, its obvious to all that Nullius is a net benefit to the forum and contributes far more that TS, so TS and Truth or dare are on ignore for me. bet it makes my day more pleasant!

[truth or dare]

We should just let him throw his temper tantrums and stop responding to his cries for attention

good call dude, its obvious to all that Nullius is a net benefit to the forum and contributes far more that TS, so TS and Truth or dare are on ignore for me. bet it makes my day more pleasant!

Nullius or rather the new incarnation of nullius has been incredibly net negative. Tecshare is clearly more intelligent.  Nullius is likely female and to my eye, English is not their first language. There are a few clues within the fluffy pompous pretentious walls of nonsense that one can spot. His arguments have gaping holes. I notice one abrasive member who interests me greatky, pointed this out almost immediately upon his resurrection

The endless quoting and urgency to demonstrate they are well read (self schooled I suspect) are key traits of peasant stock. That is no insult if taken alone.

However, the newly formed allegiance with other members that are devaluing our forum with spiteful trust abuse and stiring up trouble can not be ignored. This form of targeted abuse was not present during his previous form. This looks to be a member setting out to push the agenda of a known and documented scammer and extortionist.

You can not start to compare a solid dependable member like tecshare with his abuser Nullius. Please do not expect to be given free reign to mob and abuse members unanswered. I will remain and support any member that finds themselves being vilified for matters not related to scamming.

You give a member a red tag then you will need compelling evidence they are financially dangerous. Anything else will be compiled and used as clear evidence tagging is no longer of benefit to this forum.

The trust abuse from Nullius is useful in as much as it will serve as a clear example of how red tags can devalue the trust system while destroying our free speech.

[pugman]

So you don't think leaving Vod a negative rating for doxing and threatening to report OGNasty to the IRS is justified? Some how it always seems the one who should just "let it go" are the ones who have legitimate grievances simply because no one wants to deal with it, not because it is what is right. I would also like to remind you that I had let his past abuse go, but it didn't matter, he just continued his antagonism anyway in spite of being rebuked for it by the community more than once.

I mean, I don't want to judge this whole situation between vod and ognasty, and all the other fuckall disputes there are, its all because of ego and pride that y'all are carrying with you. And over time, that ego has grown into some sort of an unhealthy obsession wherein which some of you decided to hire PIs, contact IRS, offer death threats, bounty to stalk someone, and who knows what else. I am not supporting either parties cause it is stupidly ridiculous the way it is, and no one wants to make amends. If you dont like each other, ignore the person and move for the sake of hell, and remove them from your trust lists. But stirring more drama up has made no positive affect on any of y'alls lives so all of you're winning no oscar here. 

[truth or dare]

So you don't think leaving Vod a negative rating for doxing and threatening to report OGNasty to the IRS is justified? Some how it always seems the one who should just "let it go" are the ones who have legitimate grievances simply because no one wants to deal with it, not because it is what is right. I would also like to remind you that I had let his past abuse go, but it didn't matter, he just continued his antagonism anyway in spite of being rebuked for it by the community more than once.

I mean, I don't want to judge this whole situation between vod and ognasty, and all the other fuckall disputes there are, its all because of ego and pride that y'all are carrying with you. And over time, that ego has grown into some sort of an unhealthy obsession wherein which some of you decided to hire PIs, contact IRS, offer death threats, bounty to stalk someone, and who knows what else. I am not supporting either parties cause it is stupidly ridiculous the way it is, and no one wants to make amends. If you dont like each other, ignore the person and move for the sake of hell, and remove them from your trust lists. But stirring more drama up has made no positive affect on any of y'alls lives so all of you're winning no oscar here.  

Part of what you say is true. The solution you offer is not going to fix the problem long term.

There is ego,  but there are financial considerations and power plays here. While there is room within the trust system to game and manipulate for personal financial gain,  you will always find this bile and venom being spat at one another.  

It will drive people to extraordinary lengths and to construct webs of deception.

This abuse by Nullius or the nullius account anyway, against a flawless 8 year trader here is all part of that.

Move to an objective standard of trust feedback.

[TECSHARE]

So you don't think leaving Vod a negative rating for doxing and threatening to report OGNasty to the IRS is justified? Some how it always seems the one who should just "let it go" are the ones who have legitimate grievances simply because no one wants to deal with it, not because it is what is right. I would also like to remind you that I had let his past abuse go, but it didn't matter, he just continued his antagonism anyway in spite of being rebuked for it by the community more than once.

I mean, I don't want to judge this whole situation between vod and ognasty, and all the other fuckall disputes there are, its all because of ego and pride that y'all are carrying with you. And over time, that ego has grown into some sort of an unhealthy obsession wherein which some of you decided to hire PIs, contact IRS, offer death threats, bounty to stalk someone, and who knows what else. I am not supporting either parties cause it is stupidly ridiculous the way it is, and no one wants to make amends. If you dont like each other, ignore the person and move for the sake of hell, and remove them from your trust lists. But stirring more drama up has made no positive affect on any of y'alls lives so all of you're winning no oscar here. 

Excuse me. Don't lump me in with that description. I did absolutely NONE of those things. I don't deserve to be lumped in with this garbage false equivalence. Whatever you think about other disputes has nothing to do with Vod's behavior in regard to his rating for me. How much more evidence do you need to demonstrate Vod is abusive and a danger to others here? Does he need to be let off the hook for another 5 years? Ten? I went out of my way to avoid him, he follows me everywhere looking for any possible way to inject himself into a situation, antagonize, and throw accusations around in addition to his repeated and regular abuse of the trust system over a period of years. I would love to have no relationship to Vod whatsoever, but he has made it clear that is not only impossible, but is not what he wants. He can't control his obsessive behavior.

[pugman]

Excuse me. Don't lump me in with that description. I did absolutely NONE of those things. I don't deserve to be lumped in with this garbage false equivalence. Whatever you think about other disputes has nothing to do with Vod's behavior in regard to his rating for me. How much more evidence do you need to demonstrate Vod is abusive and a danger to others here? Does he need to be let off the hook for another 5 years? Ten? I went out of my way to avoid him, he follows me everywhere looking for any possible way to inject himself into a situation, antagonize, and throw accusations around in addition to his repeated and regular abuse of the trust system over a period of years. I would love to have no relationship to Vod whatsoever, but he has made it clear that is not only impossible, but is not what he wants. He can't control his obsessive behavior.

I am not trying to lump you into anything. If anything, I am trying to help you get rid of this mess or whatever you wanna call it, and make your life here on the forum more easier. I don't know what is up with Vod's rating with regards to you abusing the system, but I do disagree a little bit with Vod's second rating, that rating has more to do with personal agenda than with the trust/trade system. And both of you, stop calling each other mentally ill stalkers, you both are using the term way too much without even knowing the meaning of it. You're just throwing words at each other at this point, you both aren't willing to have an adult conversation about it, nor are you willing to let it go. Y'all are acting worse than Kindergarten children for goodness sake.

[TECSHARE]

Excuse me. Don't lump me in with that description. I did absolutely NONE of those things. I don't deserve to be lumped in with this garbage false equivalence. Whatever you think about other disputes has nothing to do with Vod's behavior in regard to his rating for me. How much more evidence do you need to demonstrate Vod is abusive and a danger to others here? Does he need to be let off the hook for another 5 years? Ten? I went out of my way to avoid him, he follows me everywhere looking for any possible way to inject himself into a situation, antagonize, and throw accusations around in addition to his repeated and regular abuse of the trust system over a period of years. I would love to have no relationship to Vod whatsoever, but he has made it clear that is not only impossible, but is not what he wants. He can't control his obsessive behavior.

I am not trying to lump you into anything. If anything, I am trying to help you get rid of this mess or whatever you wanna call it, and make your life here on the forum more easier. I don't know what is up with Vod's rating with regards to you abusing the system, but I do disagree a little bit with Vod's second rating, that rating has more to do with personal agenda than with the trust/trade system. And both of you, stop calling each other mentally ill stalkers, you both are using the term way too much without even knowing the meaning of it. You're just throwing words at each other at this point, you both aren't willing to have an adult conversation about it, nor are you willing to let it go. Y'all are acting worse than Kindergarten children for goodness sake.

"I am not lumping you into anything!" [proceeds to make false equivalencies lumping me in with Vod]

I know its really easy for you as an uninterested observer to just throw your hands up an call it a wash, but if you bothered to look into this at all you would see all of his accusations against me are completely baseless and a transparent attempt at extorting me into removing the very valid and well documented rating I left for him. Him simply repeating me in a refractory manner doesn't make my statements any less valid, and false equivalence is exactly what he hopes to acheive with this childish behavior, eliciting exactly the response you are exhibiting here so he can create the appearance of this being a two sided thing. I did nothing to deserve any of this and there is no reason I should tolerate it. You aren't helping me, you are negating my claims here creating a false equivalence as if I deserve responsibility for his actions.

Just as a fun little exercise to demonstrate you are projecting upon me, go back through this thread and count how many times you can see me insulting Vod. Weird... pretty sparse if any. You know why? I have explicitly refrained from doing so to prevent the exact false equivalency you are applying to me right now, of which Vod relies on to escape accountability from his own actions. I am very sorry that you don't like the conflict that results from me calling him out on his abusive behavior. I have tolerated it for over 5 years, and I am done putting up with it. The only thing I have been doing in this thread is making a critical examination of his, and Nullis's abuse of the trust system. Nothing more.

[pugman]

"I am not lumping you into anything!" [proceeds to make false equivalencies lumping me in with Vod]

HOW?? I am barely insinuating that you and Vod both don't seem to get along well, so move past everything and with your lives.
 

I know its really easy for you as an uninterested observer to just throw your hands up an call it a wash, but if you bothered to look into this at all you would see all of his accusations against me are completely baseless and a transparent attempt at extorting me into removing the very valid and well documented rating I left for him. Him simply repeating me in a refractory manner doesn't make my statements any less valid, and false equivalence is exactly what he hopes to acheive with this childish behavior, eliciting exactly the response you are exhibiting here so he can create the appearance of this being a two sided thing. I did nothing to deserve any of this and there is no reason I should tolerate it. You aren't helping me, you are negating my claims here creating a false equivalence as if I deserve responsibility for his actions.

If you so want this thing to be done with, I suggest you to lock all threads you have opened against Vod(if any, I recall seeing one, i could be wrong), press the ignore button on Vod's profile and move on. There'll be no end to this, if either one of you keeps giving attention to the other. As for the negative rating, I don't think there will ever be a proper answer to it unless there is an adult conversation between you two without mere arguing. No one else can you help you with that.

Just as a fun little exercise to demonstrate you are projecting upon me, go back through this thread and count how many times you can see me insulting Vod. Weird... pretty sparse if any. You know why? I have explicitly refrained from doing so to prevent the exact false equivalency you are applying to me right now, of which Vod relies on to escape accountability from his own actions. I am very sorry that you don't like the conflict that results from me calling him out on his abusive behavior. I have tolerated it for over 5 years, and I am done putting up with it. The only thing I have been doing in this thread is making a critical examination of his, and Nullis's abuse of the trust system. Nothing more.

If you don't like Vod's interference in your threads, put a local rule and ask him to not reply to your threads, even better make it self moderated and delete his replies if you don't want to put up with him anymore.

Disclaimer: I am still not taking anyone's side in this whole scenario/s, so don't presume random crap.

[TECSHARE]

"I am not lumping you into anything!" [proceeds to make false equivalencies lumping me in with Vod]

HOW?? I am barely insinuating that you and Vod both don't seem to get along well, so move past everything and with your lives.
 

I know its really easy for you as an uninterested observer to just throw your hands up an call it a wash, but if you bothered to look into this at all you would see all of his accusations against me are completely baseless and a transparent attempt at extorting me into removing the very valid and well documented rating I left for him. Him simply repeating me in a refractory manner doesn't make my statements any less valid, and false equivalence is exactly what he hopes to acheive with this childish behavior, eliciting exactly the response you are exhibiting here so he can create the appearance of this being a two sided thing. I did nothing to deserve any of this and there is no reason I should tolerate it. You aren't helping me, you are negating my claims here creating a false equivalence as if I deserve responsibility for his actions.

If you so want this thing to be done with, I suggest you to lock all threads you have opened against Vod(if any, I recall seeing one, i could be wrong), press the ignore button on Vod's profile and move on. There'll be no end to this, if either one of you keeps giving attention to the other. As for the negative rating, I don't think there will ever be a proper answer to it unless there is an adult conversation between you two without mere arguing. No one else can you help you with that.

Just as a fun little exercise to demonstrate you are projecting upon me, go back through this thread and count how many times you can see me insulting Vod. Weird... pretty sparse if any. You know why? I have explicitly refrained from doing so to prevent the exact false equivalency you are applying to me right now, of which Vod relies on to escape accountability from his own actions. I am very sorry that you don't like the conflict that results from me calling him out on his abusive behavior. I have tolerated it for over 5 years, and I am done putting up with it. The only thing I have been doing in this thread is making a critical examination of his, and Nullis's abuse of the trust system. Nothing more.

If you don't like Vod's interference in your threads, put a local rule and ask him to not reply to your threads, even better make it self moderated and delete his replies if you don't want to put up with him anymore.

Disclaimer: I am still not taking anyone's side in this whole scenario/s, so don't presume random crap.

Like I said, false equivalence:

You're just throwing words at each other at this point, you both aren't willing to have an adult conversation about it, nor are you willing to let it go. Y'all are acting worse than Kindergarten children for goodness sake.

I don't care what rambling Vod does. You are confused. I care that he abused the trust system against me with baseless accusations. There will never be an end to this until Vod loses his authority to abuse the trust system, because Vod doesn't want it to end. I made efforts to simply avoid interaction with him for years. He follows me around and injects himself into everything I do. Some how the drama he creates doing so is my responsibility now? Really, he is low grade entertainment to me at worst, that is until he abuses the trust system against me. That is not acceptable, and again, it is convenient for you as an uninterested observer to just tell me to drop it when I pay the price of his abuse and it costs you nothing to just tell me I should be let go.

I can't force Vod to have a logical discussion. All I can do is produce the facts of the matter that he can't substantiate any of his claims, as I have done here. He wants to avoid a critical discussion of his ratings at all costs because he knows he can't justify them. This is exactly why he is acting this way because he knows people like you will throw their hands up and call it a wash, not willing to dig through his copious amounts of bullshit.

Yes, others can help me with this.

~Vod

It is that simple.

[TECSHARE]

Once again, there is more playing with the trust system like their own personal toy today by the usual suspects. What is really odd is Nullius always seems to leave these ratings for me when I say something that makes Lauda look like an ass. It is almost like Lauda has burned their own reputation so much they are having to resort to using bought/stolen/borrowed reps to fight their battles for them.

I posted this earlier:

~

Maybe Lauda is just taking it back? This is just another good example of Lauda trying to hide the fact that they are a normie wearing 4chan culture like a suit to camouflage themselves like Steve Buscemi and his skateboard desperately trying to convince his fellow kids he is one of them. The idea of chastising some one for being racist while simultaneously lauding shitposting culture is self contradictory and yet another demonstration of the fact that Lauda exists more as a fabrication than a real personality.

Then later that day...

nullius   2020-03-10   Reference   "Spreads objectively false, dangerously misleading medical misinformation that seems as if it spewed forth from some quack site: Describes “the A.I.D.S. virus” as “an over active immune system causing the body to attack its own healthy cells.” ¶ Accuses someone who corrects him of “pointless topic sliding”. Doesn’t admit that he was wrong. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5226886.msg53920023#msg53920023 http://loyce.club/archive/posts/5391/53919747.html http://loyce.club/archive/posts/5392/53920056.html"


nullius   2020-03-10   Reference   "A pompous dolt who wreathes his grandiose troll “guild” with a pseudo-Latin motto so ungrammatical, it is obvious that he knows nothing whatsoever about Latin. All pretense and no substance, as usual. ¶ His such incompetence is unsurprising, inasmuch as his username “TECSHARE” mangles the indivisible Latin digraph CH representing X/χ (chi) from τέχνη. "



Do I have to get these people live on video explicitly admitting they are abusing the trust system as a form of retribution before these people lose any authority under it, or are some of you just ok with the fact that this abuse of the system happens, as long as it is focused against people who aren't you or your pals?

[TwitchySeal]

nullius   2020-03-10   Reference   "Spreads objectively false, dangerously misleading medical misinformation that seems as if it spewed forth from some quack site: Describes “the A.I.D.S. virus” as “an over active immune system causing the body to attack its own healthy cells.” ¶ Accuses someone who corrects him of “pointless topic sliding”. Doesn’t admit that he was wrong. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5226886.msg53920023#msg53920023 http://loyce.club/archive/posts/5391/53919747.html http://loyce.club/archive/posts/5392/53920056.html"


nullius   2020-03-10   Reference   "A pompous dolt who wreathes his grandiose troll “guild” with a pseudo-Latin motto so ungrammatical, it is obvious that he knows nothing whatsoever about Latin. All pretense and no substance, as usual. ¶ His such incompetence is unsurprising, inasmuch as his username “TECSHARE” mangles the indivisible Latin digraph CH representing X/χ (chi) from τέχνη. "

Do I have to get these people live on video explicitly admitting they are abusing the trust system as a form of retribution before these people lose any authority under it, or are some of you just ok with the fact that this abuse of the system happens, as long as it is focused against people who aren't you or your pals?

I think nullius is being sincere.

He thinks your actions are worthy of negative feedback.

I also think that your endless whining about being abused over the past 5 years has only resulted in you feeling even more abused.  You should try stopping for a while.

[TECSHARE]

nullius   2020-03-10   Reference   "Spreads objectively false, dangerously misleading medical misinformation that seems as if it spewed forth from some quack site: Describes “the A.I.D.S. virus” as “an over active immune system causing the body to attack its own healthy cells.” ¶ Accuses someone who corrects him of “pointless topic sliding”. Doesn’t admit that he was wrong. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5226886.msg53920023#msg53920023 http://loyce.club/archive/posts/5391/53919747.html http://loyce.club/archive/posts/5392/53920056.html"


nullius   2020-03-10   Reference   "A pompous dolt who wreathes his grandiose troll “guild” with a pseudo-Latin motto so ungrammatical, it is obvious that he knows nothing whatsoever about Latin. All pretense and no substance, as usual. ¶ His such incompetence is unsurprising, inasmuch as his username “TECSHARE” mangles the indivisible Latin digraph CH representing X/χ (chi) from τέχνη. "

Do I have to get these people live on video explicitly admitting they are abusing the trust system as a form of retribution before these people lose any authority under it, or are some of you just ok with the fact that this abuse of the system happens, as long as it is focused against people who aren't you or your pals?

I think nullius is being sincere.

He thinks your actions are worthy of negative feedback.

I also think that your endless whining about being abused over the past 5 years has only resulted in you feeling even more abused.  You should try stopping for a while.

Run out of things to throw at me in Politics & Society again and out looking for some more ways to settle the butthurt score?

I know you are a big fan of semantics, but a technical analysis of an analogy is beyond asinine and merely serves as a distraction from the point, as well as further excuse for abuse. The question of his sincerity is a non-sequitur. This is not an appropriate use of the trust system.

[TwitchySeal]

nullius   2020-03-10   Reference   "Spreads objectively false, dangerously misleading medical misinformation that seems as if it spewed forth from some quack site: Describes “the A.I.D.S. virus” as “an over active immune system causing the body to attack its own healthy cells.” ¶ Accuses someone who corrects him of “pointless topic sliding”. Doesn’t admit that he was wrong. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5226886.msg53920023#msg53920023 http://loyce.club/archive/posts/5391/53919747.html http://loyce.club/archive/posts/5392/53920056.html"


nullius   2020-03-10   Reference   "A pompous dolt who wreathes his grandiose troll “guild” with a pseudo-Latin motto so ungrammatical, it is obvious that he knows nothing whatsoever about Latin. All pretense and no substance, as usual. ¶ His such incompetence is unsurprising, inasmuch as his username “TECSHARE” mangles the indivisible Latin digraph CH representing X/χ (chi) from τέχνη. "

Do I have to get these people live on video explicitly admitting they are abusing the trust system as a form of retribution before these people lose any authority under it, or are some of you just ok with the fact that this abuse of the system happens, as long as it is focused against people who aren't you or your pals?

I think nullius is being sincere.

He thinks your actions are worthy of negative feedback.

I also think that your endless whining about being abused over the past 5 years has only resulted in you feeling even more abused.  You should try stopping for a while.

Run out of things to throw at me in Politics & Society again and out looking for some more ways to settle the butthurt score?

I know you are a big fan of semantics, but a technical analysis of an analogy is beyond asinine and merely serves as a distraction from the point, as well as further excuse for abuse. The question of his sincerity is a non-sequitur. This is not an appropriate use of the trust system.

If he's being sincere, then he isn't abusing you.  He's doing what he thinks is right. 

[TECSHARE]

If he's being sincere, then he isn't abusing you.  He's doing what he thinks is right.  

Of course it is just a happy coincidence no one can prove what he does or doesn't actually believe right? I might truly believe you are a vampire and stake you through the heart. That doesn't justify it. People believe lots of erroneous things, furthermore he has already demonstrated his desire to abuse the trust system against me even if you all believe these things, which I don't buy for a second.

Funny, you consider it acceptable for him to judge my intents, but not acceptable for me to judge his. This horse shit you are perpetrating certainly isn't an extension of your butthurt over being presented with ideas you can't tolerate in Politics & Society now is it?