Murat the worst campaign manager?

[rosezionjohn]

I'm not jealous of not being accepted, I just posted this because, it's a very unfair situation and a not professional act by a Campaign manager.

You posted this because you were rejected and found a hole in the campaign manager's selection process. You were also quick to call the participants that were listed in the OP as shitposters and clowns.

You guys saying that it's fair because, it's normal user VS campaign manager. But if someone famous user pointed this is out you will be in favor on them.

If the one accusing a campaign manager is a known person here in the forum, I don't think s/he would be in a rush to post something based on opinions like you did.

I think it's clearly his alts.

You could have waited for him to respond in the post you quoted before creating this topic.


Selecting applicants from tens or hundreds of applicants can be overwhelming for the manager and he may commit mistakes in the process. I was able to participate in one of his campaigns. Although there were issues with the payment for reasons I think is out of his control, he still managed to pay all the participants. From that experience, I can say he's a good campaign manager.

[1715141796]

1715141796

[cryptoaddictchie]

I make a newbie account because I am not a fan of this kind of act. but, this is very unfair to all of the forum user.
Your thoughts about this kind of manager?

He handled few projects already as far as I know and doesnt have any problem at all. I think his judgement maybe quite fast about selecting but he rectify it as people found some holes out there. Obviously they will as this campaign is btc paid. Anyway, the submission are too many and making a mistake is part of being a Manager and nobody is perfect for every action.

Why post this using a newbie account and not your main account? If you have problem with his selection then come out clean by using your own. It's like your afraid to voice out what you wanna say and get into trouble. Dont be afraid if you can justify the means.

[Yatsan]

I've been a participant of one of the campaigns that are handled by Murat (the signature campaign is 24k). He handles it very well and makes sure that all of us will receive the payment he even send me 0.0002BTC to fix the issue about the withdrawal and doesn't force me to return the 0.0002BTC to him (I returned it lol haha). About being responsible, I will highly recommend Murat! He is thinking about the participant, and I can say that he is very reliable.

As I read the issue and check those participants, I think Murat has been careless here. Even though it is solved, it will be a huge impact on his campaign management service. Don't get me wrong. Murat is a responsible manager, but in this story, he is not. Considering that, he didn't examine all of those participants and just based on the length of their post. It's normal to make a mistake, and I think this will be a lesson learned to Murat.

[spadormie]

As I reviewed his past handled projects, all payments are smooth and were paid on time. By that, your "worst" adjective is not applicable to him. He had successful runs in the past. 

Moreover, Murat could choose whoever he wants to pick for his campaign it's I think a positive thing for you because you might have a chance to get to that campaign when the users he added are not active right? And it's his campaign's lost if he added non-active/low merited users.

I make a newbie account because I am not a fan of this kind of act. but, this is very unfair to all of the forum user.

Don't get butthurt if you weren't accepted in a campaign. Get butthurt if someone in this forum found your main account because that's illegal and that's goodbye.

[RapTarX]

He may or may not doing the job properly but this isn't a good approach at all I guess. He has been recruited by the project itself and they have given him the right to run the campaign as per his ways unless he is abusing the campaign with his alt. The things you pointed could have been done through PM as well. That would be a better solution.

[Harlot]

You may say I'm biased since I'm part of the campaign but I was one of the first members that got accepted and ever since one user have posted his opinion about accepting inactive members that has merit murat actually listened and removed them all. Even if you say you have created a reputation thread against him before doing this, the point is he listened and have removed them and replace them with new members. Other than that it is his campaign and he manages the promotion of that project he has in his every right who will be part of the campaign or not, signature campaigns are not some kind of democracy where if your account wasn't selected it will suddenly become unfair because they have accepted others. And as far as for his future campaigns will go, I think he will learn from this situation and start accepting members who are actually active in the forum.

[CryptopreneurBrainboss]

And as far as for his future campaigns will go, I think he will learn from this situation and start accepting members who are actually active in the forum.

If you ask for my opinion on this issue, this should be the initial intention behind this kind of thread, although it isn't majority of the time. The act of calling out campaign manager to take correction and better themselves shouldn't be discouraged. It's the campaign managers right to choose who ever he feels is worthy of promoting the campaign he's managing but that doesn't mean his actions can't be questions and clarification been given to the community on reasons why such actions were taken.

Don't forget, it's a collective effort to better the forum, inactive shitposters or active spammers in general shouldn't be encourage to by been given slots in campaign to continue their spamming of the forum, instead correction should be given to them, advising them to better themselves and probably will have a better chance of getting accepted in the campaigns or other campaigns in the future. The managers are humans too who aren't immune to mistakes so when such scenario occurs, you call them out and it get resolved like it has in this case. No hard feeling.

[The Cryptovator]

Seems names mentioned on the OP really inactive. Although a manager reserve right to qualify or disqualify any users but they should also care about company who is paying for manage their campaign. This is manager responsible to give a reasonable output from the campaign. I can't see any reason how a inactive user could give good outcome.

Although I am new on the campaign field but I always try to choose the best participants from whoever applied. If in case I do not found participants what exactly I am looking for, then I just keep title 'OPEN' and let apply new participants. I think most of reputed managers are doing same instead of choose inactive participants.

However, we can't do anything with his campaign nor we could force him. I think better OP might ask Murat directly via PM or talk with the team directly instead of create thread.

[LiveEdutvICO]

Murat is indeed the biggest bounty manager scammer on Bitcointalk.

He scammed LEDU token team big time. This is not the first time he is scamming projects and bounty participants on Bitcointalk. He collects payment and then uses his own Bitcointalk accounts
to participate in bounties, do fake upvoting on Bitcointalk and then does not pay bounty participants their money out.

Murat is a big frausdster based in Bangladesh and no project should ever hire him as a campaign manager.

He tried to extort Bitcoin and ETH from LEDU team and did not even pay bounty participants for the LEDU bounty  he was assigned to manage. LEDU team had to pay bounty participants again because Murat disappeared with the bounty money and did not pay bounty participants. He had the audacity to request additional funds after the bounty was paid to him.

Hiring Murat was the biggest mistake LEDU team made on Bitcointalk. Avoid Murat at all cost. He style of running bounty campaigns violates all Bitcointalk rules.

I will publish a separate thread on Murat's fraudulent behavior on a new thread soon.

I'm not jealous of not being accepted, I just posted this because, it's a very unfair situation and a not professional act by a Campaign manager.

You posted this because you were rejected and found a hole in the campaign manager's selection process. You were also quick to call the participants that were listed in the OP as shitposters and clowns.

You guys saying that it's fair because, it's normal user VS campaign manager. But if someone famous user pointed this is out you will be in favor on them.

If the one accusing a campaign manager is a known person here in the forum, I don't think s/he would be in a rush to post something based on opinions like you did.

I think it's clearly his alts.

You could have waited for him to respond in the post you quoted before creating this topic.


Selecting applicants from tens or hundreds of applicants can be overwhelming for the manager and he may commit mistakes in the process. I was able to participate in one of his campaigns. Although there were issues with the payment for reasons I think is out of his control, he still managed to pay all the participants. From that experience, I can say he's a good campaign manager.

[Steamtyme]

Murat is indeed the biggest bounty manager scammer on Bitcointalk.

~doubt~

While I'm a huge fan of necrobumping threads to add nothing of value and build suspense. You should have just created a scam accusation topic detailing how you were scammed.
Saving you the trouble, you can find the scam accusation levied against Ledu here [SCAM]LEDU CAMPAIGN if you so choose. I'll get my popcorn and can't wait to see the proof... 6 months later, am I reading that right. seems odd but I've shown you the way.