Gone are the days where projects team ask for opinions from investors

[Furryball]

Who doesn't like projects that asked the audience/members about what they are feeling, what and what are missing that they want to it to get fixed, once upon a time few projects does this, they love hearing out from their investors but gone are those days..

Now new project teams always think they are the wisest, and the fact is some team are just claiming the name 'TEAM' for nothing sake, they know nothing about crypto exchanges like we do because we use this exchanges to trade time to trade, imagine warning projects about crap exchanges like p2pb2b but they failed to listen just because Coinmarketcap listed and ranked p2pb2b as top exchange they neglect advice and later they  regret..

Some times teams can know all, there are things that crypto traders and investors are aware of that's still shady to some new project teams, the wise ones are the ones that ask the audience for opinions .

[1714829627]

1714829627

[1714829627]

1714829627

[1714829627]

1714829627

[fuer44]

I understand that friend, often the team decides itself where the token will launch. bounty hunters who should know more about exchangers (because bounty hunters almost all exchangers are explored for bounty campaign reasons) must have understood, which exchangers will make the token liquidity increase, and which do not. I think the team should start listening to the bounty hunter when they are going to register the token, so that the token does not happen which ultimately has no value.

[minairia3]

Now new project teams always think they are the wisest, and the fact is some team are just claiming the name 'TEAM' for nothing sake, they know nothing about crypto exchanges like we do because we use this exchanges to trade time to trade, imagine warning projects about crap exchanges like p2pb2b but they failed to listen just because Coinmarketcap listed and ranked p2pb2b as top exchange they neglect advice and later they  regret..

If you would noticed eversince IEO started the voices of investors are put through action. No need for team members to listen to them as most investors only concern about the listing and the profits they are ripping off on this new projects.

I think the team should start listening to the bounty hunter when they are going to register the token, so that the token does not happen which ultimately has no value.

Its not that they dont listen plus what benefits they can get on suggestion of the hunters? They would not pay the exchange listing so why bother? Most projects just using hunters as a tool for their marketing purposes nothing more. That's a fact in cryptoindustry.

[Balladtony77]

Here is my own little point, If they make you all feel at home providing every thing investors asked for what do you think will happen? you will definitely want to invest more, they are trying to build somekind of tight relationship between investors and team just to make more money, I find these type of teams to be the most dangerous

[knuckey]

When the goal has been achieved, in this case the funds have been held, then all regulations and policies must be subject or obey as they wish. Often they change the agreement or do not comply with their initial bid and it is certain that all parties involved will incur losses.

Therefore we must be thorough and wise to invest or trade, because there are many opportunities that they can take advantage of in each of our investment funds.

[Winscosinally]

The only project I can side till date on this OP point is Apollo, they never did any ICO or IEO, the CEO and team spend money on the project themselves and they still ask investors for opinions, this is rare in crypto space

[memed97]

The only project I can side till date on this OP point is Apollo, they never did any ICO or IEO, the CEO and team spend money on the project themselves and they still ask investors for opinions, this is rare in crypto space

Yes, the concept of the Apollo project rarely happens in crypto space, but that does not mean it is much better than projects that have done ICO, IEO, because we can't get a little profit through the launch of the Apollo project, unless we choose Apollo to trade in exchange.

[Bttzed03]

One thing I try to avoid when expressing my opinion is to assume that I'm certain of what I'm talking about.

~ once upon a time few projects does this, they love hearing out from their investors but gone are those days..

~ Now new project teams always think they are the wisest

How sure are you? Do you have any statistical data to back up those claims?
Don't get me wrong, I understand what you are trying to point out but don't assume that it applies to all just because 10 out of 1000 does it.

~ the wise ones are the ones that ask the audience for opinions.

This sounds good on paper until you hear the audience starts asking for "when new exchange?" or "when Binance?".


From my experience hanging out with different project on their telegram, many teams do listen to their community but we have to accept the fact that not everything we say will be viable for the team. When it comes to listing on exchanges, most of them would choose small/medium with cheaper listing fees and "decent volume". I'm not sure if they even consider the exchange reputation.

[Juggy777]

Now new project teams always think they are the wisest, and the fact is some team are just claiming the name 'TEAM' for nothing sake, they know nothing about crypto exchanges like we do because we use this exchanges to trade time to trade, imagine warning projects about crap exchanges like p2pb2b but they failed to listen just because Coinmarketcap listed and ranked p2pb2b as top exchange they neglect advice and later they  regret..

If you would noticed eversince IEO started the voices of investors are put through action. No need for team members to listen to them as most investors only concern about the listing and the profits they are ripping off on this new projects.

I think the team should start listening to the bounty hunter when they are going to register the token, so that the token does not happen which ultimately has no value.

Its not that they dont listen plus what benefits they can get on suggestion of the hunters? They would not pay the exchange listing so why bother? Most projects just using hunters as a tool for their marketing purposes nothing more. That's a fact in cryptoindustry.

I believe that there’re two kinds of project in the market one that analyses what investors want and they take some basic feedback from them, and the other one is like how you have described out here they basically ignore investors feedback and these ones are mostly unsuccessful in the long run.

@minairia3 it’s a wrong mentality if the team decides there’s no need for investors feedback after all they’re only being able to execute their plans because of the investors money, hence I feel that they should at least listen to their investors feedback and implement it wherever possible.

[Kvalentine]

This doesn't clear the fact that once the team Gained the trust of investors they won't end up scamming the investors because its another form of traps for newbies and new crypto investors

[BlackFor3st]

Who doesn't like projects that asked the audience/members about what they are feeling, what and what are missing that they want to it to get fixed, once upon a time few projects does this, they love hearing out from their investors but gone are those days..

Now new project teams always think they are the wisest, and the fact is some team are just claiming the name 'TEAM' for nothing sake, they know nothing about crypto exchanges like we do because we use this exchanges to trade time to trade, imagine warning projects about crap exchanges like p2pb2b but they failed to listen just because Coinmarketcap listed and ranked p2pb2b as top exchange they neglect advice and later they  regret..

Some times teams can know all, there are things that crypto traders and investors are aware of that's still shady to some new project teams, the wise ones are the ones that ask the audience for opinions .

I really love also if this kind of scenario will continue to the team behind the project will be aware about the voices of the investors like what are their problems and how the team can help to solve it.

As what I saw also, even in their social channels there are no active supports that are willing to lessen to the problems or opinions of their users,customers and investors. Thinking that they are wise because they were able to successfully launch their project and reach their goal is not a good thinking at all as it will bring them to disaster someday, I am pretty sure of it.

[Rodeo02]

- snip -

More of the coins listed in p2pb2b is just manipulated coins ( in volume) .
Accepting suggestions from investors is what is really needed if you want your project to be successfull.  they are doing  what they  think is is good to the project but not listning to other and investors. More off them ( Crowd fund)  is just want to raise money thats why they dont wanna  hear any suggestions from others even from investors  . They only do what they think is good for them and they dont look for what will be the consequences to the project they are making  if they failed.

[oxgroth]

Sometimes team really knows better that they should do with project

[ajqjjj]

Who doesn't like projects that asked the audience/members about what they are feeling, what and what are missing that they want to it to get fixed, once upon a time few projects does this, they love hearing out from their investors but gone are those days..

Now new project teams always think they are the wisest, and the fact is some team are just claiming the name 'TEAM' for nothing sake, they know nothing about crypto exchanges like we do because we use this exchanges to trade time to trade, imagine warning projects about crap exchanges like p2pb2b but they failed to listen just because Coinmarketcap listed and ranked p2pb2b as top exchange they neglect advice and later they  regret..

Some times teams can know all, there are things that crypto traders and investors are aware of that's still shady to some new project teams, the wise ones are the ones that ask the audience for opinions .

In reality team doesn't enter suddenly so they have some investors in projects and long term efforts never died in the future so team and Investors are plan the mutual decision in crypto projects.
nowadays number of project enter in the market but few only occupy the top region so potential and innovation is important for all the new projects then only investors will enter in the new project.
I think before to launch the project some private investors are available in all the projects because they also suggest some changes and needs of the projects, May be after the launching some secret discuss will happen on team and investors so once launched successfully mostly they trying to update the further days.

[masterrex]

Who doesn't like projects that asked the audience/members about what they are feeling, what and what are missing that they want to it to get fixed, once upon a time few projects does this, they love hearing out from their investors but gone are those days..

Now new project teams always think they are the wisest, and the fact is some team are just claiming the name 'TEAM' for nothing sake, they know nothing about crypto exchanges like we do because we use this exchanges to trade time to trade, imagine warning projects about crap exchanges like p2pb2b but they failed to listen just because Coinmarketcap listed and ranked p2pb2b as top exchange they neglect advice and later they  regret..

Some times teams can know all, there are things that crypto traders and investors are aware of that's still shady to some new project teams, the wise ones are the ones that ask the audience for opinions .

Indeed true, that was the true state of the most projects today, I think they all do that for a couple of reason, they don't want things more complicated on their side thats why they picked it for their convenience while disregarding the feeling and warning of its investors and community members thats why the results were not good in the end since then crypto projects are fast evolving but not all are destined to be succeed.

[cytpoway121]

Who doesn't like projects that asked the audience/members about what they are feeling, what and what are missing that they want to it to get fixed, once upon a time few projects does this, they love hearing out from their investors but gone are those days..

Now new project teams always think they are the wisest, and the fact is some team are just claiming the name 'TEAM' for nothing sake, they know nothing about crypto exchanges like we do because we use this exchanges to trade time to trade, imagine warning projects about crap exchanges like p2pb2b but they failed to listen just because Coinmarketcap listed and ranked p2pb2b as top exchange they neglect advice and later they  regret..

Some times teams can know all, there are things that crypto traders and investors are aware of that's still shady to some new project teams, the wise ones are the ones that ask the audience for opinions .

With my time with blockchain and crypto currency, it is rare for any project team not to have an idea of what crypto currency means or its exchange.

In your instance above, don't you think it is a situation where there is no team ? and the project are only interested in picking up profits from potential ieo or open trade investors ?

Or another angle, most succesful projects don't have their top team members discussing on telegram, they delegate such role to community moderator, and handle their sphere with short views, reviews on twitter.

NB: Think am and i will like to see more views.

[Bitbtc8]

Well I haven't seen such team before, crypto space is full of team who will never listen to people's opinion because they always feel that they are doing exactly the right things

[thiscomm]

I agree with you. Most new program developers do not understand how a crypto can develop and make them number one in a market such as Bitcoin. the main purpose and target of coin users that they will make is very important, in my opinion this is the beginning of a big goal to become the most valuable coin and become number one like Bitcoin.

[alani123]

I think that the only aspect of the crypto industry mostly responsible for that, is the ICO market and the boom ethereum created for it. Many newbies came in to invest, and along with them many of the project managers knew nothing about the sense of community cryptocurrency projects used to have. ICOs were seeking funding in any way possible, they focused on marketing more than anything else, and secondly, quick profits. They were fast-paced unlicensed securities, of course they weren't going to listen to the community. Now they've set a precedent after this model, sadly.

[Leonardo7]

I have never seen any IEO conducted on P2pb2p that performs very well in the market. Once a project chooses Dobi, P2Pb2p, Latoken and the likes for IEO, I stay clear and still encourage who cares to just put their money where it's safe. Useless exchanges with fake IEO team screwing investors.