can't distrust him just because he make a one mistake using the trust system
You are seeing one mistake?
I have done some review on the feedback left by this user, not all but first few from the first page of his sent feedback page.
Feedback left for
truth or dareNewbie who suddenly is an expert on forum politics. Likely to Be CH or TOAA. No one comes to this forum fresh and starts hammering out in rep/Meta
Left negative for raising voice.
Feedback left for
iobet.iouser raises fake flags - do not trust
Left negative because the users raised a flag against him.
Feedback left for
andulolikastupid use of trust system - user not to be trusted at all
Left negative just because he was not wise enough (in him opinion ofc ) to use trust system.
Feedback left for
WEX-SCAMWeirdo alt account with sexual issues.
How was it appropriate to leave a red here?
Feedback left for
The-One-Above-AllBREAKING LOCAL RULES - OBSERVABLE INSTANCE OF MAJOR CUNTY BEHAVIOUR. so no trusting of this user is advised
he is a total cuntwanknozzle
Really or a way to shut the mouth?
Feedback left for
TranscriptJunkyI do not tryst this user. Check out the wordsmith using 500 words when 12 will do. I would advise anyone to be cautious when dealing with this user
Red tag for what reason? Shut the mouth?
Feedback left for
N0sferatuUser opposed a flag of an obvious losing situation. Do not trust this user
Red tag for opposing a flag? How it's appropriate?
Summary is that he is using feedback system as one of his tool to manipulate the voice of others.
There are many more feedback left by the same user.
I have skimmed only first 37 feedback left by him from the top.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=98986And 8 (including the one mentioned in my first post) out of 37 are used as a tool for him.Isn't it alarming?
Red trust is not only for scammers, never has been and never will be.
Red trust is not to use for personal defense too.