Craig Wright: A Very Wrong Person

[iRaMMuS34]

There's so many CW posts lately that I'm starting to believe he's the one to actually create them. Bad PR is still PR

[pixie85]

5. Craig Wright was sued to court by Dave Kleiman's brother, because he knows for a fact that Craig Wright is Satoshi and is trying to claim half of he's Bitcoin fortune. Craig Wright did not want to be put on this spotlight he was forced into it.

LOL. Craig was stealing money left and right, borrowing then not giving back. It's already proven that he owes it to the Kleiman's family. He's only trying to prove that he was the founder to make it look like he was sharing it with Kleiman not that they were both testing a system made by someone else (Satoshi). If he would manage to prove that he made Bitcoin he wouldn't have to pay but he can't do it because he's not Satoshi and no fairytales of a mysterious courier with his private keys will not help him win the case.

[JollyGood]

He is a clown and nothing more. Keep it simple

I cannot argue with that

For me its gonna be good if we can prove his claim is totally void and this will save Bitcoin's reputation for those who really doesnt know the truth.

Careful with this line of thinking. The onus is not on us or anybody else to prove his claim is void. The burden of proof is on him to substantiate his claims, and to date he has presented exactly zero solid evidence that he is Satoshi. He can't even sign a message, which is the lowest amount of evidence needed to even begin to discuss his claims.

If I claim right now that I am Satoshi, then I will have made just as compelling an argument with just as much evidence as CSW has. We don't have to prove his claim is void because it is void until he proves otherwise.

If CSW wants to live in a fantasy world, let him.  That's his right and it doesn't matter if part of that fantasy is that he created bitcoin.

It does matter, though, when he commits identity theft and co-opts Satoshi's name and reputation to run a scam. It's obviously bad for the newbies who don't know any better and get ripped off, but it's also bad for bitcoin. It sullies our reputation, it presents a bad image to the wider public, it turns off honest users, traders, merchants, and it hinders growth and adoption. If he wants to live in a fantasy world, then be my guest, but when his delusions spill over and start affecting others, he needs to be shut down at every opportunity.

The onus is definitely on him to prove his claims but he cannot provide even one iota of evidence. That has been the regular pattern on his part all along.

As long as he keep destroying the reputation that Bitcoin has and keeps claiming to be Satoshi he continues down the road of deception. Bitcoin does not need him but he living off the Satoshi and Bitcoin name.

Does anybody know the real reasons why he split from BCH, Wu and Ver to start his own SV?

[Taskford]

5. Craig Wright was sued to court by Dave Kleiman's brother, because he knows for a fact that Craig Wright is Satoshi and is trying to claim half of he's Bitcoin fortune. Craig Wright did not want to be put on this spotlight he was forced into it.

LOL. Craig was stealing money left and right, borrowing then not giving back. It's already proven that he owes it to the Kleiman's family. He's only trying to prove that he was the founder to make it look like he was sharing it with Kleiman not that they were both testing a system made by someone else (Satoshi). If he would manage to prove that he made Bitcoin he wouldn't have to pay but he can't do it because he's not Satoshi and no fairytales of a mysterious courier with his private keys will not help him win the case.

What a crazy claim for him since over the past years he can't provide a valid proof that he is the real Satoshi but we all know that all word came from his mouth is just a full shit so it's best not to listen him unless he can unlock those wallet who hold the majority of the funds or used when bitcoin is created or maybe he can message here and use the Satoshi account.

[meanwords]

Jeez. What an obnoxious person. He is the very definition of toxic. So much lies and still can't do anything about the proof yet the court hasn't judge him yet. It's a good news though that he is getting accused of tricking the court and delaying so much. Now he is refusing to submit the documents that the court want because if he do, it's game over for him. I mean, it's not like it will last long now that he doesn't have any more excuse to make except that company bullshit rule.

There's so many CW posts lately that I'm starting to believe he's the one to actually create them. Bad PR is still PR

Wrong. This posts are being made to oppose Craig Wright because finally he is at his weakest right now. He don't have anything because his excuse this past few years is this courier that will decide everything. Now that it's over, he doesn't have anything now. He can only delay because of this company rule that he is using, though it won't last long.

[Reatim]

There's so many CW posts lately that I'm starting to believe he's the one to actually create them. Bad PR is still PR

just like some post above you,a paid account of CSW team to spread His lies here in forum.how can actually someone will believe a person that cannot even prove all the things he claims?if you are the owner of something is it really hard to provide evidence ?

8. You all think Craig Wright is doing all this for the money? He is already very rich without any Bitcoins!!!

people will seek for more treasure even how rich they are,and specially if that people is Greedy so nothing we can expect but to claim to be Satoshi.

and No one here is afraid of Him,people here only wants proof and the truth.

[jseverson]

-snip-

Your line of think makes absolute no sense at all.

Nobody is accusing him of saying he is satoshi. He is deliberately saying that, and that's a crime by itself.

So what crime is he committing, and how do you prove it? Again, the burden of proof is always on the accuser. You don't ask the accused to provide proof that he is innocent to make a suit stick, you produce evidence and the court decides if it has merit. Innocent until proven guilty, not the other way around.

I'm not commenting on the state of our justice system, but the fact of the matter is, no one has been able to do anything about his lies for a reason. But hey, if it's so obvious to you and you are somehow able to make a compelling case, I'm sure the community would be up for a crowdfund.

you cannot pretend to be someone else,  it is a crime. If I do an interview on  tv saying that I am some other guy , that's a crime everywhere in the civilized world.

Until you prove that he's actually claiming to be someone else, it's your word against his. And again, the justice system presumes innocence (CSW has human rights too, apparently!), so good luck.

He is doing that to manipulate markets and make money, which is another crime.

This might actually stick, but you might need to prove that he's not who he says first.

Just to be clear, I do think he's lying and I would support action against him. I just want to remind people that these go through courts, which require evidence beyond a reasonable doubt to convict crimes. Saying "but he can't sign the keys!" sadly doesn't cut it (because he could just say he lost them, which would be reasonable, and there would be no way to disprove it), and the fact that Satoshi Nakamoto is a fake identity whose owner is completely anonymous makes it all the more complicated.

[davinchi]

LOL he’s just being so dumb. How can he be calling himself the creator of bitcoin when he doesn’t even have any proof that shows that he’s really the one? This man is really going to far with pissing a lot of people off.

So, he’s trying to say that’s he’s been the Satoshi that was posting in this forum back then? Lol. For him to make us believe him he should gain access to the wallet that is owned by Satoshi and that way we can believe that he’s the one. He doesn’t even have the access to the wallet, and he keeps saying that he lost his keys which is quite funny. How can the real Satoshi and the founder of bitcoin say that he lost access to his coins? That’s ridiculous .

[bearexin]

I think we should leave him on his own situation and let him think that he is on top of the world. We know the reality. Even I have seen him posting some nonsense onto his website and many times he has directly or indirectly mentioned about him being the real satoshinakamoto. For god's sake, why would the real satoshi reveal his identity? Maybe the real satoshi too might be watching his website and launching to the fullest just because of how fake this individual is.

It would not be difficult for us to raise some funds and take Craig Wright to the court where he would surely be sentenced but speaking the truth, we do not have this much time to waste on a person stealing someones identity just for his own sake. He would bear his consequences.

[pooya87]

~

haha, you are either so naive and gullible that have fallen for such an obvious scam that even a 10 year old would see through or you have some stake in this scam that you think Craig Scammer Wright even knew about bitcoin in early years let alone think he is Satoshi

[White Christmas]

LOL he’s just being so dumb. How can he be calling himself the creator of bitcoin when he doesn’t even have any proof that shows that he’s really the one? This man is really going to far with pissing a lot of people off.

So, he’s trying to say that’s he’s been the Satoshi that was posting in this forum back then? Lol. For him to make us believe him he should gain access to the wallet that is owned by Satoshi and that way we can believe that he’s the one. He doesn’t even have the access to the wallet, and he keeps saying that he lost his keys which is quite funny. How can the real Satoshi and the founder of bitcoin say that he lost access to his coins? That’s ridiculous .

Craig wright isn't the one who create the bitcoin nor the creator of bitcoin because as like what you have been said he doesn't have any access to the wallet that satoshi has in order for as to believe on him he must have a proof and evidence that he is the right person and he is the real satoshi nakamoto but until now he doesn't have any proof of it if he can provide a proof of access in the wallet of the real satoshi nakamoto then probably we can believe on him but no, he doesn't have any of that so this person is just pissing as off the best thing to do is that to believe on him.

[TheGreatPython]

LOL he’s just being so dumb. How can he be calling himself the creator of bitcoin when he doesn’t even have any proof that shows that he’s really the one? This man is really going to far with pissing a lot of people off.

So, he’s trying to say that’s he’s been the Satoshi that was posting in this forum back then? Lol. For him to make us believe him he should gain access to the wallet that is owned by Satoshi and that way we can believe that he’s the one. He doesn’t even have the access to the wallet, and he keeps saying that he lost his keys which is quite funny. How can the real Satoshi and the founder of bitcoin say that he lost access to his coins? That’s ridiculous .

There actually would be a number of things which can prove he is the real satoshi but he never takes anything seriously and tries to neglect such questions. Even I laughed whole heartedly when I heard that he lost control to his real wallet which was probably the wallet been used by the real satoshi. He might even login to the real satoshi account on this forum which is inactive since December 2010.

Even that might prove that he is the real founder of bitcoins but he has nothing to do with real satoshi and that is the reason why he keeps on neglecting such questions. We should actually treat this individual as a medium of entertainment and should only consider going through his articles on his websites just for fun.

[iRaMMuS34]

It would not be difficult for us to raise some funds and take Craig Wright to the court where he would surely be sentenced but speaking the truth, we do not have this much time to waste on a person stealing someones identity just for his own sake. He would bear his consequences.

That's right, eventually he'll do himself in on his own terms. We can just sit back and enjoy the ride, justice will come without our intermission. I'm sure he's got something bad going on with his brain, narcissistic manic people just don't stop. He's already lied to the court, a couple more of these incidends and he's done

[enhu]

We don't really knew who satoshi is that is why people are asking proof from CW because he claimed to be satoshi. What else can be done than ask proof. We can't just believe whatever he is saying and take all what he is saying as true.

There are other few people claiming to be the creator of BTC, should be believe him too because he claimed as satoshi as well. CW didn't give proof. If he can, he could have give it already by how excited he is in claiming. But he didn't.

[whyrqa]

It would not be difficult for us to raise some funds and take Craig Wright to the court where he would surely be sentenced but speaking the truth, we do not have this much time to waste on a person stealing someones identity just for his own sake. He would bear his consequences.

That's right, eventually he'll do himself in on his own terms. We can just sit back and enjoy the ride, justice will come without our intermission. I'm sure he's got something bad going on with his brain, narcissistic manic people just don't stop. He's already lied to the court, a couple more of these incidends and he's done

The fact is that the cryptocurrency user community no longer doubts that Craig Wright is indeed an impostor and a scammer, but I can’t understand why Bitcoin SV, thanks to this person, began to rise in price actively.  I think this situation is a definite indicator.

[BuNga_cute]

I must confess his perseverance to prove to the whole world that he is satoshi nakamoto.Craig Wright faketoshi the most passionate
struggle to prove himself is the original satoshi nakamoto compared to other faketoshi. Then I feel sorry also because its delusional is
overdone. In my opinion craig wright is very obsessed with being satoshi nakamoto, so he doesn't can distinguish which is real which is
delusional. So in my opinion just let him live in his dream world.

[JollyGood]

Surely if he could move even 1 sat from the wallets associated with Satoshi to another wallet then it would mean he had the private keys - he cannot do anything that will prove his claim beyond doubt. The man is a compulsive lair and he has tainted the name of Satoshi for far too long.

5. Craig Wright was sued to court by Dave Kleiman's brother, because he knows for a fact that Craig Wright is Satoshi and is trying to claim half of he's Bitcoin fortune. Craig Wright did not want to be put on this spotlight he was forced into it.

LOL. Craig was stealing money left and right, borrowing then not giving back. It's already proven that he owes it to the Kleiman's family. He's only trying to prove that he was the founder to make it look like he was sharing it with Kleiman not that they were both testing a system made by someone else (Satoshi). If he would manage to prove that he made Bitcoin he wouldn't have to pay but he can't do it because he's not Satoshi and no fairytales of a mysterious courier with his private keys will not help him win the case.

[omone1]

Lols, he is even a pastor, yet he couldn't prove that he's the real Satoshi. He is a specialist at deceiving the public so he continues to sell his BSV to unsuspecting investors. He has a way of dodging the questions of the law court by asking for more time, with time people will understand who is lying.

[Baby Dragon]

5. Craig Wright was sued to court by Dave Kleiman's brother, because he knows for a fact that Craig Wright is Satoshi and is trying to claim half of he's Bitcoin fortune. Craig Wright did not want to be put on this spotlight he was forced into it.

LOL. Craig was stealing money left and right, borrowing then not giving back. It's already proven that he owes it to the Kleiman's family. He's only trying to prove that he was the founder to make it look like he was sharing it with Kleiman not that they were both testing a system made by someone else (Satoshi). If he would manage to prove that he made Bitcoin he wouldn't have to pay but he can't do it because he's not Satoshi and no fairytales of a mysterious courier with his private keys will not help him win the case.

As expected, Craig keeps on manipulating the situation to make people believe him. As if someone's going to trust a deceiver's words, why would someone be convinced by a person who creates a false reality point? it is clear that he's not the person behind that pseudonym and he will never be because he can't even fight for his stand. At the end of the day, he will just suffer the consequences of his action because it's definitely identity theft.

[dongosquad]

~
As expected, Craig keeps on manipulating the situation to make people believe him. As if someone's going to trust a deceiver's words, why would someone be convinced by a person who creates a false reality point? it is clear that he's not the person behind that pseudonym and he will never be because he can't even fight for his stand. At the end of the day, he will just suffer the consequences of his action because it's definitely identity theft.

I have always wondered, what are the benefits for him by claiming to be Satoshi? I am also more surprised at people who believe his statement.
Come on, let's make it simple. Since the beginning Satoshi did not show his true identity, leave it like that and instead of dizzy thinking about and finding out who he really is, we better focus on developing ourselves in order to maximize the potential to benefit with bitcoin.