Another STO failed! STO won't work anymore.

[Chuky92]

Today I just noticed another good looking STO failed, and that STO project name is Liqio Exchange! I have never seen an STO that raised good money and doing good in the market! So why they keep coming I don't have any idea about it. I told all my friends that don't join in any STO bounty, just ignore them.

Liqio STO failed, source: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5210813.0

I am in total agreement with you, am yet to see any STO make it as well, as the ones I have seen all failed during fundraising which makes me wonder if there is something they aren't doing well or STOs are not worth it at all, but that doesn't mean that all projects doing STO do not have good ideas. STO is known to issue security tokens which comes with various legalities, could that be the reason? Or maybe people or investors don't like STO at all. Nevertheless, it's wise to be with the winning side, why going for STO again when one can take chances with IEOs on top exchanges like Binance etc.

[btc_angela]

Perhaps the STO was launched on a mid-tier exchange that's why it didn't reached it's soft cap?

Or maybe the hype has died down already? It's like almost a year or close to a year that STO suddenly exploded in the ecosystem and investors find out that it doesn't have any difference at all to the scam ICO that's why they don't want to pour their money anymore to this hype offerings.

[mu_enrico]

Yes, I mistyped, but that is not Liquid, it's Liqio exchange. You can see their bounty campaign thread from this link, https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5210813.0

To be honest, I have seen my proper STO project, like Mobu, Stellero, Bitbond, Hyghtech and so on, and no one could make a success! So, I am totally off from STO projects.

I see, Liqio Exchange...

To be honest, I doubt it was a regulated STO. If it's not regulated than it is just like a common ICO/IEO.

What if, in reality, only a small percentage of ICO/IEO that were able to reach softcap in 2017, and the rest were fake? They could say that they successfully reach hardcap even if in reality no one buy the token. This kind of thing need to be properly audited.

IMO it would be better if hunters search for community coins instead of these fund raising schemes.

[CryptoTech_]

Today I just noticed another good looking STO failed, and that STO project name is Liqio Exchange! I have never seen an STO that raised good money and doing good in the market! So why they keep coming I don't have any idea about it. I told all my friends that don't join in any STO bounty, just ignore them.

Liqio STO failed, source: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5210813.0

I also have never seen a successful STO, they all fail on average. Investors prefer to invest in IEO because they are more secure in security and profits

[Mianae]

When projects offer an STO, we forget to check if really they fulfilled all legal bonds to offer such. Another problem with security token is most lack liquidity which leads to their failure. If a security token has liquidity upon which its value is measured and paid out it won't fail. Most projects come into cryptocurrency space without having an idea how best to implement blockchain projects with effective marketing

[Free1bitco.in]

So far, there have been very few successful STOs, so until now I have avoided STO like avoiding ICO. I prefer the IEO project because it has been confirmed that it will be traded in a market, and that has made me think that the product must be finished before that. however, I have seen another STO that failed, and that made me think of moving away from it.

[Coin_trader]

As per individual investment refunds, they will eventually give back every investor his or her money back because of the legal policies involve in STOs. Frankly speaking, I will not advise any good investor to indulge himself into investing in STO, I prefer investment into IEO or even ICO. These sets have proven their worth in regard to fundraising in cryptocurrency. STO is a pure scam that should be avoided at all cost.

Your post is bit contradicting to each other. You said that STO will refund all the investors money due to legal policies involve which is "TRUE". IEO and ICO is more riskier because it's not regulated by the SEC so the investors don't have the option to refund. There's always a risk in every investment types and it's to the company on how they will roll there marketing because that is the main key for a successful
crowdfunding. There is a lot of shit/garbage project that collected more than 10M$ by just focusing on marketing. And now the value of the token is in the bottomless pit. The only problem about STO right was there is no regulated exchange that can cater them. That's why no investor will risk there money for a token that has no clear future. They are still on Gray area of crypto regulation but they not SCAM.  

[trauchot]

Yes, I also saw the news from this project about a week ago and of course I was very upset, because I participated in the bounty company from this company and it was unpleasant to read the news that such a good project would close, but there's nothing to be done, need to move on.

[bhabygrim]

STO,ICO and IEO are just the same they all have a scam project,
But it doesn't mean that all of them are scam we couldn't tell why there are still some investors to the new projects.
The market has been filled with so many fake project and team build to scam.

[shoreno]

Yes, I also saw the news from this project about a week ago and of course I was very upset, because I participated in the bounty company from this company and it was unpleasant to read the news that such a good project would close, but there's nothing to be done, need to move on.

ouch man sorry for your loss and for the others aswell . this isnt a good project if they will fail  but a good project means that they are already succesful  . this wasnt my first time to hear an sto but i think this sto are older than ico and ieo  and op could be right that sto mainly fails , that is why its rare to see them  while ico and ieo are having a more success rate   .  many people would thought that these sto's are new and can be a good replacemen to ico and ieo because both are also expriencing some issues lately  .

[jrrsparkles]

Yes, I also saw the news from this project about a week ago and of course I was very upset, because I participated in the bounty company from this company and it was unpleasant to read the news that such a good project would close, but there's nothing to be done, need to move on.

ouch man sorry for your loss and for the others aswell . this isnt a good project if they will fail  but a good project means that they are already succesful  . this wasnt my first time to hear an sto but i think this sto are older than ico and ieo  and op could be right that sto mainly fails , that is why its rare to see them  while ico and ieo are having a more success rate   .  many people would thought that these sto's are new and can be a good replacemen to ico and ieo because both are also expriencing some issues lately  .

A project with good idea can also be considered as good project but if they fails to reach cap values it will be considered as failed project because project team needs enough funds to develop their project or they will drop and will announce as failed but this is not mean a scam,scammers will never return money to investors they will run away...

[libert19]

Ico/ieo/sto, most of them fails. At least these guys are returning back money to investors unlike some others. Rip bounty hunters tho.

[J33ZY]

NEXO, is a US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)-compliant security token that pays ongoing dividends to holders. They have 550k+ users on their platform, processed over $1.5B+ in loans, made over $10M+ in profits in under 2 years of launch and the token has many utility features.

Check out my thread on NEXO, I go more in-depth with the fundamentals and technical analysis: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5226387.0

[NewRanger]

STO was not popular in crypto investors, they prefer join in IEO on reputable exchanges. no one know how STO will run well , its still strange for investors. meanwhile in exchanges we found good projects that have high hype in market. waiting IEO in binance or another best exchanges be investors choice than they loss money in STO. less projects that success in STO, so in my opinion since the beginning this scheme was failed.

[el kaka22]

It is not about STO or ICO or even IEO that these projects fail, the truth is there has been so many coins that came up in the past 3 years and people are done with giving all the power to the coins creators and they want to actually have a bit of different things in coins and they want the power.

Look at all the coins that came out in the last 1 year, you will see that the biggest power in that coin is still the creators and people hate that, they want decentralization and power equality, also go out and look at all the new ones in the past year and you will see that they are not bringing anything new to the table, most of them were created with a start-up mindset that they need to raise funds and can build afterwards but they are not anything new and whatever they say is new is not really needed at all.

[killerfrost]

STO,ICO and IEO are just the same they all have a scam project,
But it doesn't mean that all of them are scam we couldn't tell why there are still some investors to the new projects.
The market has been filled with so many fake project and team build to scam.

STO is completely different from ICO and IEO, if a project meets the STO standard, it is certainly a good project because they have gone through rigorous tests from the government. A lot of new projects today claim that they have met the STO standard but those are lies, for example the project that OP gave the link in his article.

[ATSgrowth]

I have participated in their bounty campaign, their plans where promising, they have already working platform but the bad market situation is killing every promising project.
Lets wait, I believe that in a bull market situation will back to the normal and se will again earn huge rewards in the bounty campaigns.

[Bonwin]

Today I just noticed another good looking STO failed, and that STO project name is Liqio Exchange! I have never seen an STO that raised good money and doing good in the market! So why they keep coming I don't have any idea about it. I told all my friends that don't join in any STO bounty, just ignore them.

Liqio STO failed, source: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5210813.0

I guess they only held bounty because I tried to look for the announcement thread but could not find it. Well, I might be wrong, my thinking is that it is another failed scam project. In 2019, there were a lot of scam projects that came in the form of STO. They knew that ICO was no more in vogue, but that another strategy would be to use the name STO to deceive investors. At the initial stage, a lot of investors fell for it, but it was quickly foiled. It's a failed attempt.

[nicecrypto]

Today I just noticed another good looking STO failed, and that STO project name is Liquio Exchange! I have never seen an STO that raised good money and doing good in the market! So why they keep coming I don't have any idea about it. I told all my friends that don't join in any STO bounty, just ignore them.

Are you sure it was an STO? I tried to find it through google search but couldn't find it. Can you please share the link of their website?

I even tried to search the listing websites but nothing is found. It was probably an ICO but not an STO!

Yes, it was an STO, I wanted to participate in their bounty but somehow I couldn't make it! My friends were optimistic as they did the bounty, but now they all are very sad! However, I am Sorry, mistakenly I typed Liqio, where it is Liqio Exchange. Now, I fixed the thread by updating with the link also. Thank You.

I don't see what you are complaining about, after all you where only looking to join their bounty and make money off them, since nobody is particularly crazy about investing on sto how do you expect them to be successful? It is only when people invest that a project will experience success,
Nowadays, people are running after ieo so nobody gives a damn about sto or ico anymore,
If you want to see success, then you should be a private investor to support the project,  not by complaining.

[South Park]

Today I just noticed another good looking STO failed, and that STO project name is Liqio Exchange! I have never seen an STO that raised good money and doing good in the market! So why they keep coming I don't have any idea about it. I told all my friends that don't join in any STO bounty, just ignore them.

Liqio STO failed, source: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5210813.0

From the point of view of scammers and bad developers it makes complete sense to keep creating bad project after bad project if they keep earning millions of dollars with each release of a new project, the real question is why people keep investing their money in such useless projects that have such a high failure rate? And even if we can explain this with greed and unrealistic expectations about the amount of money they can make in the market, at the same time I am still puzzled by their decision to keep investing in something that gives no profits.