Another STO failed! STO won't work anymore.

[illnino]

It's a pity, but the regulators pressed the cryptocurrency so it is unlikely that we will see another boom 

[1715199983]

1715199983

[1715199983]

1715199983

[1715199983]

1715199983

[Captain Corporate]

 That peak times of ICO (late 2017, early 2018) was all we got, and we deserve this horrible period of new coin offerings because during those times there was millions of dollars basically all stolen "legally" as in you invested into a coin and you got the coin, thats all they were responsible for and they did what they promised, that coin turned out to be totally worthless and didn't improved at all is a whole another topic of course which they can't be hold liable for. As long as people invest millions into worthless shit, I do not see how we could ever recover and actually have good decent new coins in 2020, right now if you ask people "would you trust a coin that will come out in 2020" there will be %99 of the people saying no, that is why it is really hard nowadays not because whats going on now but because what happened in the past.

[moonblocks]

STOs are a relatively new method of fund raising and not all of them are legitimate same as IEOs but once further regulation is put into place these will become a very popular way to crowdfund projects with far less scams involved

[Kotone]

Today I just noticed another good looking STO failed, and that STO project name is Liqio Exchange! I have never seen an STO that raised good money and doing good in the market! So why they keep coming I don't have any idea about it. I told all my friends that don't join in any STO bounty, just ignore them.

It's not that STO doeant really effective. There are some STOs that are completely successful and being traded on some exchange. The set up of STO is not bery far from ICO but the security than ICO is much better. That's in my opinion. Its up to you if you loses hope with STOs but some proejects with bounty are really woeth joining though STOs arent that much famous compared to IEO.

[khiholangkang]

STOs are a relatively new method of fund raising and not all of them are legitimate same as IEOs but once further regulation is put into place these will become a very popular way to crowdfund projects with far less scams involved

I don't think STO is a new method, just like ICO is only slightly different in name. They make sales on their website just like ICO, and investors don't trust them because they manipulate too much

[passwordnow]

We all fail with this description of "good looking" projects whether it's an STO, ico or an IEO. Many of these projects fail due to several factors. I don't know the factors of its failure and haven't checked their thread.
But these days, it's likely to be expected that most of these projects are bound for failure. I'm not saying that all of them are bound of it but let's say that majority of them are. People probably learned a lot from the past and even with an exception of gathering huge amount from their presales, still that doesn't count as success.

[doctor877]

looking at the numbers, STO projects havent really made any success or impact no matter how prospective the project might be. even though its difficult to get investors now due to market conditions and scams. the cycle is changing and very soon we will see a new model of funding.

[coin-investor]

The bear market puts a lot of weight on the crowdfunding, people are now more into coins that are performing great in the market, nobody wants to try new coins now the risk is just to high to ignore and investors are losing heavily because of the so many projects in ICO and STO a lot of them are in vacation mode.

[rdewilde]

Today I just noticed another good looking STO failed, and that STO project name is Liqio Exchange! I have never seen an STO that raised good money and doing good in the market! So why they keep coming I don't have any idea about it. I told all my friends that don't join in any STO bounty, just ignore them.

Liqio STO failed, source: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5210813.0

It is really not encouraging in the STO method where most if not all project looking for funding through STO always fail. With this failure rate I doubt if any new project will stil take that route because it is clear STO method of funding isn't a good and favourable one. Also, it is clear that nowadays people are more after IEOs than any other method since it proves to be better and more secured also taking into account the exchange it will take place on.

[Kvalentine]

Today I just noticed another good looking STO failed, and that STO project name is Liqio Exchange! I have never seen an STO that raised good money and doing good in the market! So why they keep coming I don't have any idea about it. I told all my friends that don't join in any STO bounty, just ignore them.

Liqio STO failed, source: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5210813.0

It has come to my attention since 2018 that many STO are just failing over and over and presently i joined relictum pro bounty that is another STO project because of few reasons, I still don't understand why STO keeps failing when they always have something good to offer, maybe investors don't just like them? Or investors look at them as another ICO scam

[South Park]

It is really not encouraging in the STO method where most if not all project looking for funding through STO always fail. With this failure rate I doubt if any new project will stil take that route because it is clear STO method of funding isn't a good and favourable one. Also, it is clear that nowadays people are more after IEOs than any other method since it proves to be better and more secured also taking into account the exchange it will take place on.

But if anything that only benefits the developers of those coins, I do not know why people keep focusing on the way the developers get the money instead of focusing on what really matters, is that coin a scam? Do the developers have some good reputation in this market? Are they who they say they are? Does the project makes sense? Is the coin innovative? Those are the things that matters to investors and in most of the cases the answers are negative and you must not invest in those coins if that is the case.

[maxreish]

Sad but when I have read their statement I was kinda disappointed about the fail project.

We would like to thank everyone who participated in the bounty campaign and the investors who believed in our project, and apologize for not being able to complete our project.

We have already refunded the few investors today and yesterday.

And the thing that they have refunded some of the investor's money means they are sincere with the project. It's just that maybe, they have not reached their goal for making it to be successfully launched. The project made a lot of steps already but oh well, if this project will not gonna work in the future then better to stop it right now like what they have did

[jerrison]

Today I just noticed another good looking STO failed, and that STO project name is Liqio Exchange! I have never seen an STO that raised good money and doing good in the market! So why they keep coming I don't have any idea about it. I told all my friends that don't join in any STO bounty, just ignore them.

Liqio STO failed, source: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5210813.0

Aside the fact that this is an STO, i consider exchangers not to be looking towards projects  like coming up with an entirely new exchange platform. The exchanger industry is currently over populated and that is the least of the challenge, capital raise for liquidity and not been an easry-run for start-up exchangers and this has been the storm rosking their boat. instead of coming up with another exchanger, i feel they should consider coming up with something like and inter-operable exchange and that will give them a lift and make them stand out. MEN(INVESTORS) WILL ONLY COME TO THE DEGREE TO WHICH YOU ARE UNCOMMON AND FINANCE YOU.

[Mpamaegbu]

Well, as long as investors and the general public continue to see the crypto sector as the shortest route to a quick ROI where they invest a little but reap so much within a short period, the crypto industry will continue to suffer to matter what efforts are introduced. ICO, IEO or STO won't really make any difference. This is a sad reality.

[Lexurdania]

Today I just noticed another good looking STO failed, and that STO project name is Liqio Exchange! I have never seen an STO that raised good money and doing good in the market! So why they keep coming I don't have any idea about it. I told all my friends that don't join in any STO bounty, just ignore them.

Liqio STO failed, source: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5210813.0

Security tokens should be a good alternative when the cryptocurrency market is sluggish. But due to lack of interest and also still many scam projects, making investors or projects that should be good to not succeed in achieving the target. At present it is necessary to be careful in choosing investments

[thisnewcoin]

Well, as long as investors and the general public continue to see the crypto sector as the shortest route to a quick ROI where they invest a little but reap so much within a short period, the crypto industry will continue to suffer to matter what efforts are introduced. ICO, IEO or STO won't really make any difference. This is a sad reality.

Sorry, I have to disagree with you! IEO already found its safe place, all the big exchanges still bringing IEOs and the result is incredible! Recent Wazirx can be a real example! ICO had a golden year, even in 2018, many ICO succeeds, only scammers ruined the ICO sector. But about STO? Golden or bad time, STO is badly failed idea in crypto!

[Samayuki]

The bounty project I'm promoting is STO project that many knew they fails alot but I'm not that bothered because this project is trying to deliver something entirely fresh, it win the best startup project of 2019 and I can't wait to see how far this project will go

[Free1bitco.in]

I never invested yet in these types of projects, but I would say that whatever models of projects comes out in the future, whether it'd be ICO 2.0, IEO 2.0 or even STO 2.0, these wouldn't be the best indicator for good projects anyway. It is seemingly just narrowing the possibility of scams like IEOs wherein the devs need to comply first on the requirements that the exchange needs from them before listing of the coin would be possible. If they can still list their coins, but the project itself is just like one of those projects that gives shitcoins, it is just like the 99% of scam ICOs that people told you.

Well, this might not depend on the type of sales, but the concept and quality of the project itself. honestly don't care if it's ICO, IEO, or STO if the projects they make are really high quality, I think people will be interested. however, I would rather choose IEO in sales, because until now, I rarely hear that STO can be as successful as IEO.

[RealMalatesta]

Yeah, it is really never going to be a standard. People still think that the way offering happens decides the funding it gets or decides on how good it will be. The reality is, doesn't matter if it is ICO or STO or IEO, if a coin is good it is good, if a coin is bad it is bad, how it was offered will not change that.

Sometimes there is hype and some projects gets more money than they deserve, look at leo and look at binance early IEO ones and you see they were hyped and got more than they deserve, on top of that look at previously on 2017 peak times, projects got funded in billions total and not many of them became good. So long story short, how it is offered is not the issue, the projects itself are the real problems we have to somehow try to figure out and solve.

[reallester]

Today I just noticed another good looking STO failed, and that STO project name is Liqio Exchange! I have never seen an STO that raised good money and doing good in the market! So why they keep coming I don't have any idea about it. I told all my friends that don't join in any STO bounty, just ignore them.

Liqio STO failed, source: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5210813.0

Well never heard of this STO before. But I doubt there is any STO that has done well in the market. STOs and ICO have failed to deliver.  Gone are the good days of them.