Another STO failed! STO won't work anymore.

[letyouearn]

Someday STOs will win and launch a new hype, but not today, that's true. The idea itself is cool and I hope we will see some successful projects here even this year.

[luckyflop]

Someday STOs will win and launch a new hype, but not today, that's true. The idea itself is cool and I hope we will see some successful projects here even this year.

The STO was planned 1-2 years ago, and so far I have not seen any projects that can implement the STO. So I think it will never come true because it's too difficult for projects to meet the standards. IEO will continue and it will help make quality new projects a success

[Valzador]

Today I just noticed another good looking STO failed, and that STO project name is Liqio Exchange! I have never seen an STO that raised good money and doing good in the market! So why they keep coming I don't have any idea about it. I told all my friends that don't join in any STO bounty, just ignore them.

Liqio STO failed, source: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5210813.0

As I recall, there was a successful security token offer. If I am not mistaken, Polymath, I have forgotten whether they ever made a sale or not, their platform looks convincing and continues to grow until now. STO is not a bad thing.

[hirngespenst]

Someday STOs will win and launch a new hype, but not today, that's true. The idea itself is cool and I hope we will see some successful projects here even this year.

Yes, STO idea is cool, they are regulated, so scam issue will be less in STO. Rather I assume STO would be better than ICO, IEO. Because they will protect the coin's price, so, the investor will get a huge profit instead of losing capital because of utility. Almost 90% of altcoins have no utility use cases! I believe it too that soon or later STO idea will click!

[cytpoway121]

I think sto has been bound to fail even before their first attempt. And that is one reason I have Ensured to avoid every token that went towards that sto direction.

Even though, faba seem to do the same, it's on lock and liquidity isn't reassuring.

None the less, avoid Crowdfunding if you can't go wif the flow

[RDNX]

Currently there are too many existing exchanges, last year there were many exchanges that have to stop working, I do not think a new exchange at this time can attract users if there is no great resources. .

Well, I Agree. Right now I only stay with one big exchange.
The problem with the new exchange is about volume trade.

[viananda2525]

STO scheme coming in uncorrect time while market bearish and investors scared to invest in new project. so its normal when many STO failed and get less investors. they were very traumatized by the losses that have been suffered in previous projects. new model crowdfunding will not guarantee investors get profits, its still doubting.

[South Park]

ICO failed in 2017.
STO failed in 2018.
IEO failed in 2019.

What else will come? What else will scam investors? How many scams we need to learn from our mistakes.
I would like to see finally regulated crypto startups that provide real results?

I can not agree with you. Everyone is screaming about failures, but what does it really mean. Indeed, if 5 out of 100 projects, 5 have become really successful and the crypto market has been advanced by several steps, then in my opinion this can be called success and not failure. Look at how fundraising behaves in the field of start-ups, there are all over the place with continuous failures. Nevertheless, the most significant projects find their way to the top.

But what it means to be successful? If successful means to raise enough funds and make some money to the early investors then you are right, some projects become successful once in a while, but since 2017 what projects have actually advanced the market of cryptocurrencies? Do we have a lot of new coins with new characteristics that surpass bitcoin or some of the other established coins in the market? The truth is that most of those new coins are just copies of other projects or at most just change a thing or two while the rest remains the same and as such those coins are still no good at all.

[btc_angela]

STO scheme coming in uncorrect time while market bearish and investors scared to invest in new project. so its normal when many STO failed and get less investors. they were very traumatized by the losses that have been suffered in previous projects. new model crowdfunding will not guarantee investors get profits, its still doubting.

How about IEO? they also come on the worsening market conditions, but some of them enjoyed initial success right? So it has nothing to do with market being bearish, maybe the project itself is not that attractive causing investors to stay away.

[omone1]

Bitbond is an STO made in Germany as the team reported, today I can't even hear of them again. All the STO I followed up are not been heard again, it seems these STO were lying about their business model that made them fail.

[reallester]

Today I just noticed another good looking STO failed, and that STO project name is Liqio Exchange! I have never seen an STO that raised good money and doing good in the market! So why they keep coming I don't have any idea about it. I told all my friends that don't join in any STO bounty, just ignore them.

Liqio STO failed, source: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5210813.0

Has any STO ever been successful? I doubt no. STO projects are full of scams and I dont think any would make an impact in the space. Currently we have a few IEOs which are being successful. I will never key into any STO project. They are all scams.

[Nekkyush]

I don't really know much about STO projects but I think Liqio has a reason for their initial fail announcement. I came across their group on telegram and there's a new announcement that the project is back and will compensate previous investors. Probably, the project isn't failed per se. I hope they come back strong anyway. We don't need more failed projects, they are too many already.

[dataispower]

I don't really know much about STO projects but I think Liqio has a reason for their initial fail announcement. I came across their group on telegram and there's a new announcement that the project is back and will compensate previous investors. Probably, the project isn't failed per se. I hope they come back strong anyway. We don't need more failed projects, they are too many already.

This is one mistake some projects make, why announce project failure when there is still hope of continuation later on. Some actions are just taken so quick, without thinking of the impact. Who will believe in a project after announcing failure, then announcing that they are back again. I'm not against STOs like OP mentioned, some are really successful. NEXO for instance was one, correct me if I'm wrong.

[JHORN]

STO projects are always a disappointments but for how long? I think many STO devs don't know how to handle Security Token based projects because of the difficulty surrounding them e.g security and regulatory governance, if a STO project is not strong enough they die easily

[spike420211]

Today I just noticed another good looking STO failed, and that STO project name is Liqio Exchange! I have never seen an STO that raised good money and doing good in the market! So why they keep coming I don't have any idea about it. I told all my friends that don't join in any STO bounty, just ignore them.

Liqio STO failed, source: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5210813.0

It is impossible to say unequivocally that something works or does not work in just a few episodes.

STO is a fairly young type of fundraising, given that not many such events have been held.
Look at the statistics of ICO projects there are a much larger ratio of failed projects compared to successful ones.

[pjwaffle]

It's a pity, but the regulators pressed the cryptocurrency so it is unlikely that we will see another boom 

This exchange I have seen before. All are built on the outer shell, essentially inside are all the top coin listed and trading volume is not much. They built STOs to raise funds at a time when the cryptocurrency market was bad. Failure is a matter of course.