There is any problem if anyone make any post on behalf of banned user?

[tranthidung]

Temp-ban data aren't public. Only global mod that can view it iirc. That being said, there are tools such as https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5092983.0, modlog or BPIP to view the status of a user (banned/inactive, etc).

Temp-ban data are not included in the modlog. With temp-bans, users can still wear their signatures so there is no way to detect them, technically, AFAIK.

Lol say what? The first time, he didn't know it wasn't allowed. I would have expected him to learn from that ban.
So my guess is the ban got longer this time?

I think that is expected. My wild guess is that it would be around 2 weeks, a month or it varies from the rule broke.

They are not fixed offfence for all but maybe it is 2-week temp-ban this time.

First offence: 7 days
Second offence: 14 days
Third offence: 30 days
Fourth: Permanent ban

[1714768595]

1714768595

[1714768595]

1714768595

[1714768595]

1714768595

[1714768595]

1714768595

[Rohan Kotkar]

Suddenly yesterday I discovered this curiosity.    

Suppose your friend is banned for few days  and unable to make any post. But he needs to make an announcement which is urgent/necessary. So if he asked you for making a post on behalf of him. And you make the post.

So, In this case is there any problem can happen with your account? Is there any rules about this case?    Just want to be clear about this. Thanks

I don't really think this might be tolerated onto this forum. That specific friend can create a new account and clearly mentioning previous ban and can post the announcement from that account.
Anyways, what can that urgent announcement be? It can only be that urgent if that friend is some coin developer or anything.

[Steamtyme]

A single post for information and clarity sake is fine. Situations like the middle of a sale or escrow, even managing a campaign fit into this scenario.Sometimes mods have allowed a user a mini grace period to tie up a loose end before beginning the temp ban. I have reported users in the past who continued to run their business through a proxy during their temp ban, that's bullshit as far as I'm concerned.