Sometimes hunters are to be blame

[Mondinic]

In a way, it's wrong because they don't understand the information contained in the campaign, and as long as they follow several campaigns at the same time because they see a lot of value and don't think of a minimum selling price of their income, maybe it should be noted

[Wulan]

what else can I do sometimes I just follow the campaign period as long as I get a bounty or token and hoard it and hope the price will go up in the future but sometimes it's not as expected, maybe this is also one of the things that annoy the bounty hunter.

[Btc_1856]

what else can I do sometimes I just follow the campaign period as long as I get a bounty or token and hoard it and hope the price will go up in the future but sometimes it's not as expected, maybe this is also one of the things that annoy the bounty hunter.

We should always follow their rules mentioned in bounty thread, otherwise, they will not allocate stakes to us. That's why we should be very careful before participating in any campaign, after joining bounty many people will not follow their rules and regulation, at last, they will lose their earning. That's why we should always check the spreadsheet on a weekly basis whether rewards are added or not.

[Baoanhbmt]

 Bounty hunter should count the allocation in USD. Not all projects will succeed even if we choose them right but doing research can safe you from time wasting projects, there are different between the two, scam projects and projects that are good but failed. Some bounties have very low reward pool but after bounty ends they x2,x3,x4 in price.

[jossiel]

In a way, it's wrong because they don't understand the information contained in the campaign, and as long as they follow several campaigns at the same time because they see a lot of value and don't think of a minimum selling price of their income, maybe it should be noted

Test and choice. That's why they go along with a bounty or a campaign whether they have no idea how much the value will be in the future. I don't think that they see the value but it's just that many bounties are not good to try.

So it's a choice that comes in and at the same time a test of joining. Test in a matter that they are good whatever is the result of the project they've joined. Because many in today's time are not paying anymore so, they have nothing to lose when they try as long as they don't join the scam bounties.

[Bezobraznike]

   One thing is bother me, after the end of the bounty many bounty hunters stop promoting the project. It's an
early stage, to get people interested you need to continue to share their content, so other can see and join,
only like that the price can grow, with more demand.
   But bounty hunters think just about initial profit, they stop supporting the project and it's natural that price
will drop. If you truly believe in the project and you wish to see higher prices continue with support even after
the end of bounty.

[TheUltraElite]

   One thing is bother me, after the end of the bounty many bounty hunters stop promoting the project.

Many but not all. Some of them whole-heartedly believe that the project is going to be big even if they are made of fool of by others. This is what makes it look bad for that person, eventually he/she will understand that they have put their money into the rabbit hole and would have to hold on to those coins for years to come. Point is that team owners dont care and they started it for making money anyway.

But yes majority of bounty hunters are like that. They blindly promote something hoping it will be big and they get paid for it.

[carlfebz2]

   One thing is bother me, after the end of the bounty many bounty hunters stop promoting the project.

Many but not all. Some of them whole-heartedly believe that the project is going to be big even if they are made of fool of by others. This is what makes it look bad for that person, eventually he/she will understand that they have put their money into the rabbit hole and would have to hold on to those coins for years to come. Point is that team owners dont care and they started it for making money anyway.

But yes majority of bounty hunters are like that. They blindly promote something hoping it will be big and they get paid for it.

If they dont value much out of their effort and resources wasted then most of the time they wont really matter that much if they would get paid or not.

Chances on getting paid nor able to have that token to have some value is very less compared on past years.ICO turns to be shit and same goes

for the bounty hunting thing.Its been said for how many times that it isnt feasible or worth anymore but there are still people who do still believe and hope.

[CuriousGeorge]

In a way, it's wrong because they don't understand the information contained in the campaign, and as long as they follow several campaigns at the same time because they see a lot of value and don't think of a minimum selling price of their income, maybe it should be noted

They were putting a very big expectation for their payment while they were not DYOR. Some hunters have already promoted the scam project and this is the problem. They didn't wanna try to use their effort.
In bounty the total prize cant be calculated.

[Mondinic]

In a way, it's wrong because they don't understand the information contained in the campaign, and as long as they follow several campaigns at the same time because they see a lot of value and don't think of a minimum selling price of their income, maybe it should be noted

Test and choice. That's why they go along with a bounty or a campaign whether they have no idea how much the value will be in the future. I don't think that they see the value but it's just that many bounties are not good to try.

So it's a choice that comes in and at the same time a test of joining. Test in a matter that they are good whatever is the result of the project they've joined. Because many in today's time are not paying anymore so, they have nothing to lose when they try as long as they don't join the scam bounties.

you are also right maybe it is for the test for the hunters too, or maybe also in order to better understand in the search field for campaigns or prizes, and also for the time being I know that there are many who cheat or take off their project income without caring supporters, So advice "Tests & Choices" from you maybe now I understand this better, thanks

In a way, it's wrong because they don't understand the information contained in the campaign, and as long as they follow several campaigns at the same time because they see a lot of value and don't think of a minimum selling price of their income, maybe it should be noted

They were putting a very big expectation for their payment while they were not DYOR. Some hunters have already promoted the scam project and this is the problem. They didn't wanna try to use their effort.
In bounty the total prize cant be calculated.

It seems like they are thinking through ego and momentary desires, I think that is why it is meeting a dead end.

  that is also true of many groups who spread good news to attract supporters, then when they reach their support, they seem to disappear without a trace.

[TheUltraElite]

If they dont value much out of their effort and resources wasted then most of the time they wont really matter that much if they would get paid or not.

Thats where you are getting it wrong. They just want the money, at least most of them but they get really mad if they dont get paid even if they dont know a thing about what they are promoting.

ICO turns to be shit and same goes for the bounty hunting thing.

ICOs were born to be shitcoins. It was a failed concept but people jumped into the bandwagon due the hype effect and got ripped off. Without regulation and not being legal securities, tokens are worth nothing. But they did get swayed by the promise that those tokens would be next to bitcoin. 

Its been said for how many times that it isnt feasible or worth anymore but there are still people who do still believe and hope.

Just like people who believe that bitcoin doubling services are legit and cloud mining is a legit thing, there will be people who join bounties and cry for not being paid anything.

[VDraci]

Some bounty hunters get attracted to a bounty campaign for different reasons like polished projects or huge numbers of tokens, I take my time on a bounty project before deciding to promote the project, for me it's all about the use case, not what I'm going to get, better use case means good demand and high value

[shinratensei_]

Some bounty hunters get attracted to a bounty campaign for different reasons like polished projects or huge numbers of tokens, I take my time on a bounty project before deciding to promote the project, for me it's all about the use case, not what I'm going to get, better use case means good demand and high value

That's a good point too but i personally thinking about the usecase will not always bring good demand and value. The good use case must be combined with a good market too.

I personally putting market as the first consideration and then the use case of the product as my second consideration.

[posporo]

I guess the one who must be blame is the one who take actions. Everyone who chooses their own path is responsible for their choices so if anyone lacks research for joining a bad bounty, be responsible also for it because whatever the reason you may have, you made a wrong move.

[Barbut]

I wouldn't put all bounty hunters in the same group. There are hunters who just wish to make a profit, to sell tokens for some other coin or fiat, and to quit the project. It's not something that real supporter would do. I follow projects even after the bounty ends, I try to be active and share their announcements, the project can't grow and rise in price if all supporters just disappear and do nothing after they got some tokens.
Be an active supporter if you wish to see your project rising, with a passive approach the project will fail over time.

[Btc_1856]

Some bounty hunters get attracted to a bounty campaign for different reasons like polished projects or huge numbers of tokens, I take my time on a bounty project before deciding to promote the project, for me it's all about the use case, not what I'm going to get, better use case means good demand and high value

That's a good point too but i personally thinking about the usecase will not always bring good demand and value. The good use case must be combined with a good market too.

I personally putting market as the first consideration and then the use case of the product as my second consideration.

Agree, we should consider both the market and use cases of the product, how can a community and traders get more belief in the product because the product is something which the company has a dedication towards the development to the next level.

[TheUltraElite]

I guess the one who must be blame is the one who take actions. Everyone who chooses their own path is responsible for their choices so if anyone lacks research for joining a bad bounty, be responsible also for it because whatever the reason you may have, you made a wrong move.

True, but I have seen some hunters genuinely working to promote the project as if it was their own project. This type of mentality is going to hurt them severely when the project fails to deliver and cannot payout the bounties. Wiser ones have learnt from their mistakes and stopped taking part in these bounties and moved on to better and more stable modes of earning. The bounty section spam has also reduced much recently but some people are still making new account and taking part in them.

Nobody is going to judge a bounty to be bad or good because the world is like that, you need to learn to judge and face the consequences of your judgement.

[rozak]

It's a shame asking a bounty Hunter about a project he is promoting and can't say why he choose the project, some bounty hunters are still promoting projects blindly, they don't do research, mainly when a bounty campaign offers 1 million tokens they think it's huge money whereas the total value is around 3000$ for all campaigns 🤪 and after getting paid complains takes place, who is at fault here?

Well, I used to do that always as long as participating in a project, no matter what, the most important thing was that I got paid, but as time went by, I knew that if we just blindly didn't know what the price would be like, but now I prioritize meticulously and finding ways to not take too much time

[Wulan]

what else can I do sometimes I just follow the campaign period as long as I get a bounty or token and hoard it and hope the price will go up in the future but sometimes it's not as expected, maybe this is also one of the things that annoy the bounty hunter.

We should always follow their rules mentioned in bounty thread, otherwise, they will not allocate stakes to us. That's why we should be very careful before participating in any campaign, after joining bounty many people will not follow their rules and regulation, at last, they will lose their earning. That's why we should always check the spreadsheet on a weekly basis whether rewards are added or not.

Yes, usually when the submission has been approved and the spreadsheet is listed, sometimes it takes a few days to be updated and the stakes can still be empty even though we have been working on the commands of the Rules, now sometimes it's been up to 2 weeks and still not updated and still empty, now it looks like that's where it becomes lazy to do it but yes in the end the spreadsheet is updated but usually because we are lazy we've been left behind a few weeks,