(CFNP) BlockZone Signature Campaign

[Naficopa]

A very interesting coincidence:

"[ANN]⭐️ BITTREX GLOBAL EXCHANGE ⭐️" - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5220521.0

I will be representing their responses on this thread.

"BlockZone Signature Campaign"

I'm here representing BlockZone.

I wonder how many other projects you represent "together"..?

[Timelord2o67]

Well, if the mods really are watching, perhaps they can do something about HatuSS's multiple posting in this thread?

[HatuSS]

Well, if the mods really are watching, perhaps they can do something about HatuSS's multiple posting in this thread?

This is a peak of irrationality.
You're referring to my responses to queries either directly about or stemming from initial queries about the campaign...

[YOSHIE]

@HatuSS, you want to debate or want to run your current campaign.

Try to think professionally, if you are a team that represents the campaign BlockZone "do not fight the flow of running water, you can be dragged deeper currents, so it will sink", the members here give advice to the BlockZone campaign manager, good intentions, like the campaign rules that have been carried out by other managers, nothing more.

If you want to debate, open a topic on reputation, this is a campaign, you have to find participants to advertise your campaign, if you post bullshit here, you will not get the participant you are looking for, the bullshit you get.

Do something that can make other members sympathetic and happy to promote your campaign.
try to think for a moment, you want to implement a campaign or want to argue, this is a strange campaign for me.

[HatuSS]

@HatuSS, you want to debate or want to run your current campaign.

Try to think professionally, if you are a team that represents the campaign BlockZone "do not fight the flow of running water, you can be dragged deeper currents, so it will sink", the members here give advice to the BlockZone campaign manager, good intentions, like the campaign rules that have been carried out by other managers, nothing more.

If you want to debate, open a topic on reputation, this is a campaign, you have to find participants to advertise your campaign, if you post bullshit here, you will not get the participant you are looking for, the bullshit you get.

Do something that can make other members sympathetic and happy to promote your campaign.
try to think for a moment, you want to implement a campaign or want to argue, this is a strange campaign for me.

Do you notice the ridiculous irony in your statement since not only are you the one debating here, but you've also overlooked my message above that anyone who wants to discuss irrelevant things can use PM? Had you looked at that, you'd know that I have already suggested debates be taken elsewhere.

When making a suggestion, try not be self-contradictive.

With that said, my statements here are responses to either questions or baseless assumptions (like yours). And beyond that I have already mentioned whoever (like you) wants to further discuss anything beyond application is free to PM me.

[YOSHIE]

When making a suggestion, try not be self-contradictive.

self-contradictive: No, I'm not contradictory and opposite.

PM: unprofessional to me "does not benefit me" if you cannot be compromised, discussed, and given direction/advice by members in this forum, You, just make a campaign in your home, bring participants to promote your campaign with your relatives at home.

Bug, this is a discussion forum, public, not as beautiful as you might think.

if you continue to quote and answer people's comments here, and don't think about how best for now, I'm sure your campaign thread is full of bullshit replies.

[HatuSS]

bullshit replies.

At least you're self-aware of both your mindset and capability. I'll take your one decent advice and ignore your laughable, meaningless hostility beyond this post.
--

[electronicash]

I'm more interested in what goal does this campaign want to achieve?
If it is about spam, it would be enough to provide rules for example a minimum of 50 posts per week and a minimum of 20 characters in the post. That should be enough.
Now it's more like a challenge / competition than a promotional campaign.

seen someone in the meta section where he asked if he can do a signature campaign similar to what OP wants. its him actually lol  its this thread https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5229229.msg53931496

this is the kind of campaign that intends to make a thread in bitcointalk to rank on some key words he wants. basically its for SEO and likely he wants links to its post as well.

Its best for OP to just hire someone to do a per post but he would have to be careful not to get caught else its a negative impact to his companies reputation.

[Naficopa]

seen someone in the meta section where he asked if he can do a signature campaign similar to what OP wants. its him actually lol  its this thread https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5229229.msg53931496

this is the kind of campaign that intends to make a thread in bitcointalk to rank on some key words he wants. basically its for SEO and likely he wants links to its post as well.

Its best for OP to just hire someone to do a per post but he would have to be careful not to get caught else its a negative impact to his companies reputation.

Nice catch!

So, under the signature campaign, an SEO campaign will be done.. interesting.. it has not been here yet  

Of course, despite so many negative comments in the other thread, the campaign will be created anyway. After all, the goal is completely different ...

[HatuSS]

Could you please explain the business value of such rules?

Ad visibility/exposure. If a topic takes off most people won't browse through all the posts, and regardless of the topic length, the first 1-3 pages are more likely to be seeing more views. Participants of campaigns with such rules can expect to be watched closely by users and mods alike.

^ The reasoning is not too hard to grasp. It's in fact on page 1 by some one else. 
The forum won't/can't have a major role in SEO, especially from a cost point. It's a Web3, thus the link value is too low. Before claiming SEO, take the moment to look at the first thread and note that it DOES NOT state users need to focus on any keywords.

One baseless accusation after the other. Humorous and ridiculous.

[Timelord2067]

One baseless accusation after the other. Humorous and ridiculous.

It's a car crash occurring in slow motion.  Everyone - give him some room to hyperventilate!

[crypto1010]

- Minimum 5 OP posts (Meaning threads created) every week.
- Minimum of 5 constructive posts on the first page of a thread.
- And an additional minimum of 10 more constructive posts up to the third page of a thread.

So you're looking for sixteen people to create between them a total of 80 new threads (every week) and then keep coming back to those threads week after week to effectively necro bump them if they are not popular.  (Mods delete posts if the same poster posts days apart without any other poster participating, so you'll end up with participants posting "quality" posts only to have those posts deleted because no one else has posted.).

Ad visibility/exposure. If a topic takes off most people won't browse through all the posts, and regardless of the topic length, the first 1-3 pages are more likely to be seeing more views. Participants of campaigns with such rules can expect to be watched closely by users and mods alike.

Might want to re-think how your campaign is conducted.

Hmm, no, you need better reading comprehension. It clearly states you need to make 5 threads per week, and then 15 more normal posts. It says 'Minimum of 5 constructive posts on the first page of a thread.' notice the 'page of a thread' not your own thread, any thread but it simply has to be on the first page. Not that hard to understand I would say.

I will be posting the spreadsheet with accepted participants in a bit!

[bittraffic]

5 Threads a week, anyone can do that.  But I think the complain isn't just about the rules that will just trigger participants to spam, the pay isn't also worth. 

There isn't a particular rule about such campaign rules in the forum but it raise social disagreements. If this rules of campaign will soon be approved and become common for advertisers, there will be more similar threads created from time to time.

[crypto1010]

Here is the spreadsheet with accepted users:

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1xkGib_5ja__4VAQUSvLPi0dJl8ZRLss2UnsQfUQMCMU/edit?usp=sharing

[vycl87]

Thank you a lot for your acceptance.
I've just worn signature.

[Erdogan]

I confirm! This is a good campaign! Everyone will be happy!

I dont like situations

situation is that everyone dont like me

now everyone dont like manager of this campaign
 
i think he have good idea

i support good ideas

fingers crossed

[Text]

What a rule? This is the first time I see a kind of rule that exists here, so different. Requiring the participants to make new threads that I don't see as needed on this forum unless those newly created threads will be helpful and important.
Well, posting on the first page targets to see the advertisements highly visible. I hope those posters would contribute constructively and appropriately on the topic.

[jack05]

Thank you a lot for your acceptance.
I've just worn signature.

Could you better explain how you warn people..? Or maybe worn? or..?

[Timelord2067]

Thank you a lot for your acceptance.
I've just worn signature.

Could you better explain how you warn people..? Or maybe worn? or..?

vycl87 is wearing the signature, hence it is worn.  Nice try jack05, but you weren't able to warn anyone with that one.


anyone feel like running a book to see who tanks in the first few weeks?

Our starting players are as follows:  

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1xkGib_5ja__4VAQUSvLPi0dJl8ZRLss2UnsQfUQMCMU/edit#gid=0

[Oilacris]

Im not aware on signature rules..@OP, are you sure about this? making 5 op post then the rest is on your own comment on the thread maked?

I would say that i'd better quit yet doing such rule wont be an easy one unless you spam...