[LIST] HQ posters renting out their signatures, avatars and p. text.

[TheBeardedBaby]

...

Will you be removing users if/when they join a SigComp?  A few of the SigComps have become quite fluid recently and closed at short notice.

I'm planning to check every user on the list once a week and probablly update the merit, and if they have paid signature + avatar then I will remove them.
Maybe a simple post as I joned a campaign can also save me some time but this will be considered later. I have to see how many participants there will be.

[1715326181]

1715326181

[1715326181]

1715326181

[1715326181]

1715326181

[1715326181]

1715326181

[Chikito]

Please listing me, here my aplication

Code:

[tr][td][url=https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=938833][b]DroomieChikito[/b][/url][/td][td][center][color=green][b]FR[/b][/color][/center][/td][td][center][color=green][b]FR[/b][/color][/center][/td][td][center][color=green][b]FR[/b][/color][/center][/td][td][center][color=black][b]BTC&Top Altcoin[/b][/color][/center][/td][td][center][b]500+[/b][/center][/td][td][center][url=https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=pm;sa=send;u=938833][b]Send PM[/b][/url][/center][/td][td][center][url=https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5230794.0][b]link[/b][/url][/center][/td][/tr]
[tr][td][hr][/td][td][hr][/td][td][hr][/td][td][hr][/td][td][hr][/td][td][hr][/td][td][hr][/td][td][hr][/td][/tr]

Thanks

[ChuckBuck]

@ChuckBuck @Saint-loup @bitmover @STT
On the list

Can you make some edits, pls?

| User	| Avatar	| Signature	| P.text	| Payment in	| Received merit	| PM the user	| Link to Post |
ChuckBuck	FR	FR	FR	BTC only	115+	Send PM	N/A

[TheBeardedBaby]

@ChuckBuck Updated, wrote just BTC to save some space
@DroomieChikito You are also on the list with a small correction, 600+ received merit.

I thoguth to inlude turst but it will be too much info, maybe link to BPIP for more stats instead and replace the post link. What you guys think?

[ChuckBuck]

I thoguth to inlude turst but it will be too much info, maybe link to BPIP for more stats instead and replace the post link. What you guys think?

Yes, I think the link to BPIP is good to see more information, from BPIP, we can see more information if necessary, it's quite convenient. By the way, I see a small error in my trust in BPIP compared to here, I don't know whether to report it to the implementers 

[Chikito]

Thanks for listed me.

What you guys think?

I agree with you

[Kalemder]

| User	| Avatar	| Signature	| P.text	| Payment in	| Received merit	| PM the user	| Link to Post |
Kalemder	FR	FR	FR	Salable crypto	959+	Send PM	link

You can add me too
I wrote details here: link

Thank you...

[LoyceV]

Suggestion: add Trust scores to the list, like pugman did.

[Saint-loup]

Update :

I'm currently in a signature and avatar campaign.

| User	| Avatar	| Signature	| P.text	| Payment in	| Received merit	| PM the user	| Link to Post |
Saint-loup	IC	IC	FR	N/A	750+	Send PM	N/A

\/ @Timelord2067 It's this one :
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5230893.0

[Timelord2067]

Suggestion: add Trust scores to the list, like pugman did.

Knowing how trustworthy a Campaign Manager is is not the same as knowing how trustworthy (or not) a SigCamp participant is.   A SigCamp participant only has to post, whereas a Campaign Manager has to hold funds tally participants posts, update spreadsheets and of course pay the participants on time.

My understanding of Trust scores is they fluctuate monthly or, when a user goes from DT2 to Zero and their previously given trusts are suddenly meaningless then hold weight when they bounce back as happened recently with this user.  You could ammend everyone's scores only to have to go back and change them back a week later.  But, if that's what you want to do, don't let me stop you.

My most trusted score is around the 215 -235 - 255 band usually.


<OT> Hey Saint-loup, what's the link to the SigCamp you're in? </OT>

[ChuckBuck]

@iasenko Please correct me again   I'm in another campaign right now, I'll have at least 4 weeks here   So the information should be edited as below:

| User	| Avatar	| Signature	| P.text	| Payment in	| Received merit	| PM the user	| Link to Post |
ChuckBuck	IC	IC	FR	BTC only	115+	Send PM	N/A

Thank you!
EDIT:

<OT> Hey Saint-loup, what's the link to the SigCamp you're in? </OT>

You can see here, but it's CFNP now

[KTChampions]

| User	| Avatar	| Signature	| P.text	| Payment in	| Received merit	| PM the user	| Link to Post |
KTChampions	FR	FR	FR	BTC/ETH/$	700+	Send PM	N/A

iasenko

Thank you!

[YOSHIE]

| User	| Avatar	| Signature	| P.text	| Payment in	| Received merit	| PM the user	| Link to Post |
YOSHIE	FR	FR	FR	BTC/ETH	190+	Send PM	N/A

Application Submission; there are currently no links to visit privately.
@iasenko, thank you very much before.
Everything can be updated, if it has a good chance.

[LoyceV]

Knowing how trustworthy a Campaign Manager is is not the same as knowing how trustworthy (or not) a SigCamp participant is.   A SigCamp participant only has to post, whereas a Campaign Manager has to hold funds tally participants posts, update spreadsheets and of course pay the participants on time.

Although that's all true, a positive trust score just looks better for advertising.

A user with has a much higher advertising value than a user with or even (I'm ignoring ranks here for the sake of argument).

[Timelord2067]

Knowing how trustworthy a Campaign Manager is is not the same as knowing how trustworthy (or not) a SigCamp participant is.   A SigCamp participant only has to post, whereas a Campaign Manager has to hold funds tally participants posts, update spreadsheets and of course pay the participants on time.

Although that's all true, a positive trust score just looks better for advertising.

A user with has a much higher advertising value than a user with or even (I'm ignoring ranks here for the sake of argument).

That may be true if you are looking for someone who (for example) has gained all their trust feedback's via being escrows, or has sold trinkets years ago when people gave out positives for $1 sales of dubious keys that were probably WaReZ created anyway.

A Casino would probably want someone with Game thread credentials, a Mixer probably in the meta, or alt coins, same with an Exchange (alt coins for like) so they probably won't be looking for the cracked codes trust feedback.


But if it massages peoples' egos just that little bit, sign me up to that to.  It was 8/4/0 the other day when some-one dropped off of DT2 (that was probably me that took that screen-shot BTW) - It may have changed again, I don't go looking at such things on a daily basis.

     

(we are talking about wearing signatures still - aren't we??)

[SFR10]

Thanks for creating this thread.
^{- Here's mine}

| User	| Avatar	| Signature	| P.text	| Payment in	| Received merit	| PM the user	| Link to Post |
SFR10	FR	FR	FR	BTC only	365	Send PM	link

[Timelord2067]

EDIT:

<OT> Hey Saint-loup, what's the link to the SigCamp you're in? </OT>

You can see here, but it's CFNP now

Thanks for the link - I missed seeing that [ANN] this morning.

Application Submission; there are currently no links to visit privately.

I *think* the link is for the OP so people browsing the list can jump to our respective posts for expanded details.

Thank you, iasenko!

Yes, thank you @iasenko.

[hugeblack]

Hugeblack	FR	IC	FR	Bitcoin	[1100]	Send PM	link

[TheBeardedBaby]

The next update will be next week, maybe on Monday, depends on how i am with the free time.
Those who are on the list and have entered in a campaign sig+avatar will be removed. Im considering to change a bit the format and add trust + link to bpip project.

Have a nice weekend guys

[slackovic]

The next update will be next week, maybe on Monday, depends on how i am with the free time.
Those who are on the list and have entered in a campaign sig+avatar will be removed. Im considering to change a bit the format and add trust + link to bpip project.

Have a nice weekend guys

Just to be clear, the rule is that a user has to have at least 100 Merits received in the last 120 days or overall? I guess it's the first (in the last 120 days), but you should put that in writing just to be clear.