Bitcoin Forum
May 06, 2024, 12:08:51 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Parallel block chains  (Read 756 times)
noodles85 (OP)
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 9
Merit: 0


View Profile
November 19, 2011, 04:16:30 PM
 #1

What are the possible implications of parallel block chains developing. For instance if a country or significant subset of people got isolated for a substantial period of time, they would surely start work on their own block chain. When this isolated group was then reconnected to the rest of the network then, assuming that they did not hold the majority of the processing power, the block chain they had been working on would be destroyed and all transactions placed in that time lost.

This may be unlikely to happen but if it did then:

How would it be detected, as the bitcoin client only has a handful of connections to other nodes and does not need connections to every other node so a decrease in the total nodes available would not really be possible. Looking at how bitcoin tries to find other nodes there would probably have to be some malicious activity involved to keep fake irc/dns records but may be possible through 'natural' causes.

If this did happen and the resulting lesser block chain was valid. How would these transactions be recovered if at all possible?

This doesnt sound beyond the realm of possibility and if isolations happened often( malicious or natural ) then this would surely seriously affect the reliability of any bitcoin transactions placed.

Even in the event that an attacker gains more than 50% of the network's computational power, only transactions sent by the attacker could be reversed or double-spent. The network would not be destroyed.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1714954131
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714954131

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714954131
Reply with quote  #2

1714954131
Report to moderator
BTCurious
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 714
Merit: 504


^SEM img of Si wafer edge, scanned 2012-3-12.


View Profile
November 19, 2011, 04:19:44 PM
 #2

The transactions wouldn't be lost, they would be broadcast to the rest of the world upon connection. Assuming no one tried to spend some coins in the isolated country and in the rest of the world simultaneously, the transactions would just be included in the next block(s), and all should still be fine.

noodles85 (OP)
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 9
Merit: 0


View Profile
November 19, 2011, 04:32:18 PM
 #3

This would still cause them to go from confirmed back to unconfirmed for a while though.

Probably only going to be a problem if it happens with malicious intent right?
BTCurious
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 714
Merit: 504


^SEM img of Si wafer edge, scanned 2012-3-12.


View Profile
November 19, 2011, 04:36:59 PM
 #4

Correct, and correct Smiley

Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!