Get into checking WHO out. Not all their members agree that Coronavirus should be called a pandemic. There is a lot of evidence that CV is mostly fear and hype.
Really? Someone still thinks it's just hype and fake news? You guys should take it seriously...
I wonder what they think that it takes to call an outbreak as pandemic.
We have faced 50.000 deaths worldwide in such a short period of time and we are still counting.
We are more than a quarter of the way through 2020. Lots of the 50k you mention died
WITH coronavirus and
OF things like highly metastasized stage 4 cancer, but by policy some countries (U.S., Italy) will count them as a 'covid-19 death'. Even then around 60M people die per year so around 15,000,000 will have died.
50,000/15,000,000 = 1/300 = 0.003 = 0.3%
That's pretty easily within the range that could be buried under a complete hoax. It's certainly not a problem worth destroying the global economy over since such a destruction will lead to far more deaths than this. The thing which makes the most sense to me is that it was time to 'pull' the economy itself and this was just an excuse and smoke-screen.
Apart from that, we do not have the cure or the vaccine to this virus so it is still rampant and will be in the near future as well.
Coronavirus is around all year every year. It sweeps back and forth around the world as the common cold then goes away when a population has developed a relatively modest amount of natural herd immunity.(*) Always has.
We've never had a vaccine for coronavirus deployed yet, although attempts to develop one have been attempted and ended in disaster. Why do you think that
this coronavirus will remain rampant until a 'cure or vaccine?' Who told you that, and did they give you a justification?
---
(*) 65-70%. Initially the immunologists assumed that 70% should be good enough for vaccines because it made sense based on observations of naturally occurring infections. It wasn't. Nor was 80%. Nor 90%. Nor is the current 95% given various outbreaks of various infections in 'highly vaccinated populations.' Nobody has a very good explanation for this very inconvenient conundrum...or wishes to talk about it because it is embarrassing and interferes with other plans and the marketing spiel.