WARNING !! ISPOLINK plagiarized whitepaper content

[Shef198911]

Name : Ispolink

Scammers Profile: Ispolink

ANN Thread: No
Bounty link - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5230935.0

Whitepaper Link:https://www.ispolink.com/Ispolink_Whitepaper_v1.pdf

Good evening, everyone! I checked the white paper of Ispolin k for plagiarism ! The results are not the best, the Whitepaper is collected in chunks from various sources as well as other people's Whitepaper, screenshots prilogayu, if you think that I am wrong, please unsubscribe and explain what and I will then immediately delete the topic, but for now I think it is necessary to warn the others ! If you have a desire, you can double-check me on your sources! Thanks

[Saisher]

I almost joined their social media campaign glad that I did not but many did, bounty hunters should be made aware of this, one of the biggest issue here is copying other's whitepaper because these people don;t really have a project or platform to set up and they need to coined words and copy other's work, let's see if they have an explanation on this.

[Jawhead999]

Have you read the reference before?

When you find the plagiarism content, you should check the reference first to make sure this white paper is plagiarism or only using reference from other site/content.

I think it's not plagiarized since they're using as a reference, so it will avoid plagiarism

What is plagiarism?
Plagiarism is using someone's writing and ideas without acknowledgement.

As plagiarism may be penalised by the Open Polytechnic, it's important that you avoid plagiarising. You can avoid plagiarising if you reference your work correctly.

 

Disclaimer is not content about the project, you can't show this as a proof of plagiarized white paper. You will saw another tons project have a same disclaimer.

I am not a part or team of Ispolink project. But, it's not enough proof to say this is the scam project.

If you have more proof, you can post it

[Shef198911]

Have you read the reference before?

When you find the plagiarism content, you should check the reference first to make sure this white paper is plagiarism or only using reference from other site/content.

I think it's not plagiarized since they're using as a reference, so it will avoid plagiarism

What is plagiarism?
Plagiarism is using someone's writing and ideas without acknowledgement.

As plagiarism may be penalised by the Open Polytechnic, it's important that you avoid plagiarising. You can avoid plagiarising if you reference your work correctly.

 

Disclaimer is not content about the project, you can't show this as a proof of plagiarized white paper. You will saw another tons project have a same disclaimer.

I am not a part or team of Ispolink project. But, it's not enough proof to say this is the scam project.

If you have more proof, you can post it

is not plagiarized? some material is taken from someone else's whitepaper and not one word, but paragraphs

[Sterbens]

Have you read the reference before?

When you find the plagiarism content, you should check the reference first to make sure this white paper is plagiarism or only using reference from other site/content.

I think it's not plagiarized since they're using as a reference, so it will avoid plagiarism

What is plagiarism?
Plagiarism is using someone's writing and ideas without acknowledgement.

As plagiarism may be penalised by the Open Polytechnic, it's important that you avoid plagiarising. You can avoid plagiarising if you reference your work correctly.

 

Disclaimer is not content about the project, you can't show this as a proof of plagiarized white paper. You will saw another tons project have a same disclaimer.

I am not a part or team of Ispolink project. But, it's not enough proof to say this is the scam project.

If you have more proof, you can post it

is not plagiarized? some material is taken from someone else's whitepaper and not one word, but paragraphs

Means that if some material is taken from several projects means Isopolink does not have a good idea in their project so they take the word from several projects to include it.
I am still not sure about this Isopolink project because my product is not very clear in my opinion.

[Shef198911]

Can someone re-check on a better program for plagiarism, to 100% make sure, and one more thing, I looked at all the profiles of the team and linkedin, it seemed strange to me that the profile does not indicate that they work in this company, even the CEO is not specified in the experience

Profile link - https://www.linkedin.com/in/emanuil-pavlov-b32263105/

[procoiner20]

Have you read the reference before?

When you find the plagiarism content, you should check the reference first to make sure this white paper is plagiarism or only using reference from other site/content.

I think it's not plagiarized since they're using as a reference, so it will avoid plagiarism

What is plagiarism?
Plagiarism is using someone's writing and ideas without acknowledgement.

As plagiarism may be penalised by the Open Polytechnic, it's important that you avoid plagiarising. You can avoid plagiarising if you reference your work correctly.

https://i.imgur.com/3Qz7IwW.png  https://i.imgur.com/esa1O0J.png

https://i.ibb.co/HgGCQdq/Screenshot-227.png

https://i.imgur.com/uQhlyYS.png https://i.imgur.com/0DpgdOE.png

Disclaimer is not content about the project, you can't show this as a proof of plagiarized white paper. You will saw another tons project have a same disclaimer.

https://i.imgur.com/WwCteMT.png

https://i.ibb.co/ZY9YhNJ/Screenshot-228.png

I am not a part or team of Ispolink project. But, it's not enough proof to say this is the scam project.

If you have more proof, you can post it

is not plagiarized? some material is taken from someone else's whitepaper and not one word, but paragraphs

Means that if some material is taken from several projects means Isopolink does not have a good idea in their project so they take the word from several projects to include it.
I am still not sure about this Isopolink project because my product is not very clear in my opinion.

I disagree with you. This is poor attempt to create FUD and discredit the project. First of all, the similarity of the content is below 10% on average which is rather low and proves the opposite -it's not plagiriazed. It's normal to have similarities, because clearly there has been a through research made, you can't simply make the data up. In addition, the only part that has been take is the definition of Matic and it's features, and also in the references section they have included the source, I don't see any issue with that.Unless you expect to make up new definition of other projects?  In order to categorize the whitepaper as plagiarized, it should have 50% or more similarity, word by word the , copy pasting. Clearly this is not the case here. Why don't you analyze other whitepapers too, how about Tron's whitepaper?

I've read through it and it seems a well grounded and justified project.

[procoiner20]

Can someone re-check on a better program for plagiarism, to 100% make sure, and one more thing, I looked at all the profiles of the team and linkedin, it seemed strange to me that the profile does not indicate that they work in this company, even the CEO is not specified in the experience
https://i.imgur.com/iqT9eJ4.jpg
Profile link - https://www.linkedin.com/in/emanuil-pavlov-b32263105/

This is unjustified accusation and can be hardly called plagiarized. I have checked now and the Linkedin profile of the CEO confirms his involvement with the project. My best guess is the're just beginning to market the project publicly.

[stompix]

Can someone re-check on a better program for plagiarism, to 100% make sure, and one more thing, I looked at all the profiles of the team and linkedin, it seemed strange to me that the profile does not indicate that they work in this company, even the CEO is not specified in the experience

Profile link - https://www.linkedin.com/in/emanuil-pavlov-b32263105/

This is unjustified accusation and can be hardly called plagiarized. I have checked now and the Linkedin profile of the CEO confirms his involvement with the project. My best guess is the're just beginning to market the project publicly.

Hmm, why isn't he also mentioning his involvement in the scam coin, now defunct dexa coin?

Why has his name disappeared from the main article on DEXA coin:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5158033.0

But not from the translations:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5176750.0
http://archive.vn/wip/Wyt6M

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5171840.0
http://archive.vn/wip/pjNyd


Somebody was in a hurry to edit their linkedin info:



3 jobs at the same time..impressive /s