For Upcoming Developers

[VDraci]

This is a quick advise to upcoming developers, once a coin is dead please let them stay dead, there is no single revived coin on crypto space that did better, here are few reasons why

1. Old dev might have build to scam others or just pump and dumped

2. It never have a better use case to begin with, that's why it's dead

3. Old stains will always remain alive, you can try changing the project name but investors aren't stupid, once they lose interest, it's over

It's better to spend time looking for flaws in many crypto projects today, many things are still missing in crypto space, give us something entirely new and you will see better supports

Thank you

[slashz9]

I think some dev projects are not all evil they fail indeed for a reason like lack of funds or there is no reason the project survives because of poor performance, but does not deceive investors.
 there's no harm in trying to re-create a new project with a new name of course, so that people will see a more attractive appearance than before.

[poodle63]

I think even the upcoming developers will not even taking the risk by reviving the scam coin or dead coin. The new developers will always have something big to be achieved and especially when they have had a very strong intention to build a successful platform and they must try to build it based on their own plan. As far as i can see if the only scammer who is always coming by trying to revive the old dead coin just for the scam purpose only.

[20kevin20]

I think even the upcoming developers will not even taking the risk by reviving the scam coin or dead coin. The new developers will always have something big to be achieved and especially when they have had a very strong intention to build a successful platform and they must try to build it based on their own plan. As far as i can see if the only scammer who is always coming by trying to revive the old dead coin just for the scam purpose only.

EDIT: Please note I do NOT endorse this coin. The revival of it may very well be another scam, but the idea of reviving a coin through another blockchain is pretty interesting.

Actually, there are projects that have been revived by the community very well. One of these projects is VEROS. The initial coin was launched a few years ago by a most-likely false development & team which has exit scammed (I lost a lot of money thanks to the scamming team).

Post the exit scam, a community launched a token called VEROS, using the same logo, as a Fundraising Platform for Charities. I find it a pretty interesting idea. If a coin is dead, it doesn't mean it cannot be revived. But revive it under another blockchain so the initial "developers" would have no chance to sell their coins if a revival is incoming

[JeotQ]

I think some dev projects are not all evil they fail indeed for a reason like lack of funds or there is no reason the project survives because of poor performance, but does not deceive investors.
 there's no harm in trying to re-create a new project with a new name of course, so that people will see a more attractive appearance than before.

The problem is they never become successful once they failed or died, it's better to leave them be and try to build projects from scratch, since 2017 I've never seen a dead project that got taken over by a new dev doing so well

[Alobo Realer]

From my own point of View; Reviving a dead coin mean a whole lot:
1. The need for greater involvement and effort in other to wash the former stains of failure,
2. The Developer having that sense(once dead) will be compelled to or better still be motivated to bring the coin back to limelight. As such the effort of the Developer will be utmost and hence the end will meet a well reformed Coin.
NB: Reviving a dead coin is not all waste of time because it is possible and easier since there's already a foundation though not strong enough but restructuring can make it stronger and more Feasible( that is if the project didnt die as a result of fraudulent but poor finance)

[Ridwan Fauzi]

I just thinking crypto space is fulled by a project and I think most the project that become a shitcoin have a good function as well. Why we need more project that we support if we have a good project already that can be used in everyday?

Just develop that already been in the market, someone can contact the developer that he has something that can make his project develop well. So, we can support a few project that have a good function and there is no chance for the poject become shitcoin at the end.

[thiscomm]

That's right, let an old coin project have to die on the market. try to develop and create new branch coins from the program. an example of success that has been done is the classic ethereum which is willing to break itself into two and develop a new ethereum that has emerged from it and the proof is that ethereum can be successful after the solution occurs. and the classic ethereum also hasn't died yet, which means that by trying to develop new coins that have more potential it can also help old coins that will die again be seen because their names are packaged from new coins that were launched.

[Ryushin]

That's right, let an old coin project have to die on the market. try to develop and create new branch coins from the program. an example of success that has been done is the classic ethereum which is willing to break itself into two and develop a new ethereum that has emerged from it and the proof is that ethereum can be successful after the solution occurs. and the classic ethereum also hasn't died yet, which means that by trying to develop new coins that have more potential it can also help old coins that will die again be seen because their names are packaged from new coins that were launched.

I don't get what you mean, old coin have to stay alive to become fork able, if the old die their won't be any fork, moreover what OP is talking about is reviving dead coins not forks

[coinfinger]

This is some good advice but some people may understand it because the op didn’t put it well. He’s trying to say that new developers shouldn’t follow the footsteps of those old developers that didn’t the wrong thing, like creating the same projects over and over again, it’s best to look for something new and create than creating the project that is there already.

Even if you want to create a similar project of what has been created by other developers, you should do it with a new touch and add something unique to it, maybe something that was missing in the other one that was created by others.

[Samayuki]

From my own point of View; Reviving a dead coin mean a whole lot:
1. The need for greater involvement and effort in other to wash the former stains of failure,
2. The Developer having that sense(once dead) will be compelled to or better still be motivated to bring the coin back to limelight. As such the effort of the Developer will be utmost and hence the end will meet a well reformed Coin.
NB: Reviving a dead coin is not all waste of time because it is possible and easier since there's already a foundation though not strong enough but restructuring can make it stronger and more Feasible( that is if the project didnt die as a result of fraudulent but poor finance)

It's like looking for an easy way out, every single one that was  revived performs very badly, it's not wise to continue and abandoned project, it's not a waste of time if you want to use the old project to expand your knowledge

[Byakuga]

If you want to become a developer you should start thinking for yourself, you can learn from others but don't ever copy from others, try to be unique

[magnum cyber]

there is also a point, but not all developers are like that and also not all projects will have the same fate. this is cryptoqurrency financial freedom which is good luck for anyone. many bad or good projects end otherwise. there is no way to get past all of this except about how you take part in this industrial space.

[m4reyes]

Better with experience developer for joining and investing some coin, we know how many new developer make scam coin and never listing on the exchange market, better with experience and manage with many ICO before.

[JeotQ]

Nothing can make me trust a revived project either it was dead due to low trading volume or other problems, once it's dead it's dead to me, I was obsessed with this idea years ago and every single one I tried out aren't doing any good, I end up losing some money

[Yaunfitda]

On the contrary, I think altcoin market is already saturated with a lot of tokens that has similar use case, so it's hard to think and developed new projects as most sectors have been covered up already. It's just a matter on how projects are going to market it so that many people will see the potential used of them.

For dead coins, yes, certainly, no need to revived them because it will be simply used for p&d. It can attract newbies but chances are they are going to be suckered by this projects to funnel money out of them.

[Akiko]

Nothing can make me trust a revived project either it was dead due to low trading volume or other problems, once it's dead it's dead to me, I was obsessed with this idea years ago and every single one I tried out aren't doing any good, I end up losing some money

I see many project doing that before most of them failed to revive it.
From dead project it is really hard for investors to trust it even they manage to change the ownership of the coins. Those who feel victim from what that project do before will always came with negative though about the project.