StonerStanley Retarded Attempt At Extortion

[TECSHARE]

The extortionist pops up again, this time manipulating Nutilduhh into trading for an exchange of trust rating removal based on their mutual disdain for me off topic in the Politics and Society section.

Hello nutildah.... you gave me a negative feedback few months ago because i "harrassed" someone who disrespected me and who is the same person below that start disrespecting you because of your opinion (he his called "TECSHARE") ... Be serious and honest, maybe you could think about removing your negative feedback on my profil and i'll remove mine. This is just my vision of the common sense i'm not here to offense you and i totally agree with your comment here. I don't disrespect people if they don't do it with me, so i think you are wrong by giving me this feedback but i totally understand why you thought you were right.

Thank you.

I see, so you asking me for help, then me going out of my way to help you just for you to talk shit and post my PMs is me disrespecting you first huh? Interesting. BTW why the fuck are you even posting this in Politics & Society? Oh that's right, because you know it is a convenient place to manipulate that retard Nutilduh using the fact that they confuse emotion with logic to trade a mutual removal of trust ratings based on the fact that you both don't like me. What a couple of dopes.

Seems kind of dishonest leveraging baseless negative ratings to try to get others to remove theirs doesn't it?

I agree with this statement.  If you believe someone deserves negative feed back, and you remove it simply to get them to remove theirs, users in the future will be unaware and more likely to be scammed.

I wonder if TwitchySeal still holds this opinion. I would love to hear some more of his usual mental gymnastics when he contradicts himself.

[nutildah]

My negative trust for Stanley was based on him harassing DT members. This is one of the more flimsy things to base a red trust on (in my book), and I decided to be forgiving about it. He asked in a courteous way if I would remove the negative trust I left on his account (albeit in the wrong section of the forum), which was a big step up from his previous behavior, so I did. As a result, the situation has been de-escalated.

Q: But what about him promising to remove his negative trust on you? Doesn't that count toward some kind of extortion attempt, to which you willingly conceded?

A: We all know his feedback does not show up as default. If I cared so much about about it, I would have been bothered about it in April.

[StonerStanley]

The extortionist pops up again, this time manipulating Nutilduhh into trading for an exchange of trust rating removal based on their mutual disdain for me off topic in the Politics and Society section.

Hello nutildah.... you gave me a negative feedback few months ago because i "harrassed" someone who disrespected me and who is the same person below that start disrespecting you because of your opinion (he his called "TECSHARE") ... Be serious and honest, maybe you could think about removing your negative feedback on my profil and i'll remove mine. This is just my vision of the common sense i'm not here to offense you and i totally agree with your comment here. I don't disrespect people if they don't do it with me, so i think you are wrong by giving me this feedback but i totally understand why you thought you were right.

Thank you.

I see, so you asking me for help, then me going out of my way to help you just for you to talk shit and post my PMs is me disrespecting you first huh? Interesting. BTW why the fuck are you even posting this in Politics & Society? Oh that's right, because you know it is a convenient place to manipulate that retard Nutilduh using the fact that they confuse emotion with logic to trade a mutual removal of trust ratings based on the fact that you both don't like me. What a couple of dopes.

Seems kind of dishonest leveraging baseless negative ratings to try to get others to remove theirs doesn't it?

I agree with this statement.  If you believe someone deserves negative feed back, and you remove it simply to get them to remove theirs, users in the future will be unaware and more likely to be scammed.

I wonder if TwitchySeal still holds this opinion. I would love to hear some more of his usual mental gymnastics when he contradicts himself.

I was on the nutildah's blacklist so i finally posted a message on the forum to reach him.... (no, it's not as complicated as you pretend)

Since everything i said on my message is a part of truth and a part of my thought, you shouldn't call it a manipulation.

I also removed my negative feedback from your profil at the same time, you probably didn't even see it because i didn't tell you anything about it.... So i'm far from being a manipulator.

I don't want more problem and i'm aware of my mistakes, you should also think about it. I'm a person not a puppet.

Thanks.

[TECSHARE]

My negative trust for Stanley was based on him harassing DT members. This is one of the more flimsy things to base a red trust on (in my book), and I decided to be forgiving about it. He asked in a courteous way if I would remove the negative trust I left on his account (albeit in the wrong section of the forum), which was a big step up from his previous behavior, so I did. As a result, the situation has been de-escalated.

Q: But what about him promising to remove his negative trust on you? Doesn't that count toward some kind of extortion attempt, to which you willingly conceded?

A: We all know his feedback does not show up as default. If I cared so much about about it, I would have been bothered about it in April.

I see, so your defense is your rating was invalid to begin with.

Conceded? What did I concede exactly? StonerStanely is a manipulative cunt just like you are, and he played you like a fiddle jumping in while you were all riled up and got you to wipe his rating clean because you were so pissed off at me. This is funny because he is also pretty retarded, but he managed to manipulate you anyway. Lets break this down...

-You left a rating you say was invalid to begin with

-This sock puppeting extortionist trust abuser manipulated you into removing it because you were so emotional and thought it was a way to "get" me because you know he, much like you has an obsession with me

-Here you are once again trying to make this into some kind of crime I perpetrated to distract from your own irrational and emotion based actions

In summary, you are ok with a person who is a known sockpuppeting, extortionist, trust system abuser as long as it serves your personal vendettas. Is that about right?

[StonerStanley]

My negative trust for Stanley was based on him harassing DT members. This is one of the more flimsy things to base a red trust on (in my book), and I decided to be forgiving about it. He asked in a courteous way if I would remove the negative trust I left on his account (albeit in the wrong section of the forum), which was a big step up from his previous behavior, so I did. As a result, the situation has been de-escalated.

Q: But what about him promising to remove his negative trust on you? Doesn't that count toward some kind of extortion attempt, to which you willingly conceded?

A: We all know his feedback does not show up as default. If I cared so much about about it, I would have been bothered about it in April.

I see, so your defense is your rating was invalid to begin with.

Conceded? What did I concede exactly? StonerStanely is a manipulative cunt just like you are, and he played you like a fiddle jumping in while you were all riled up and got you to wipe his rating clean because you were so pissed off at me. This is funny because he is also pretty retarded, but he managed to manipulate you anyway. Lets break this down...

-You left a rating you say was invalid to begin with

-This sock puppeting extortionist trust abuser manipulated you into removing it because you were so emotional and thought it was a way to "get" me because you know he, much like you has an obsession with me

-Here you are once again trying to make this into some kind of crime I perpetrated to distract from your own irrational and emotion based actions

In summary, you are ok with a person who is a known sockpuppeting, extortionist, trust system abuser as long as it serves your personal vendettas. Is that about right?

No, as you can read there i talked about the fact that you insulted him. Everything is clearly explained. " i harrassed someone who disrespected me and who is the same person below that start disrespecting you"

Hello nutildah.... you gave me a negative feedback few months ago because i "harrassed" someone who disrespected me and who is the same person below that start disrespecting you because of your opinion (he his called "TECSHARE") ... Be serious and honest, maybe you could think about removing your negative feedback on my profil and i'll remove mine. This is just my vision of the common sense i'm not here to offense you and i totally agree with your comment here. I don't disrespect people if they don't do it with me, so i think you are wrong by giving me this feedback but i totally understand why you thought you were right.

Thank you.

And this private message from you before you started to disrespect me, show clearly what you think about Vod and other members that were on the thread and how you talked about them. All that because i was peacefully talking with them. Peacefully.
It was far before i started to disrespect you.

Anyway i do not have time to waste in such conversation.

Do me a favor please. Don't respond to those asshats. Let me deal with them. No one takes them seriously and I know how to make a joke out of them. You have nothing to gain by engaging them.

[suchmoon]

Can someone please ELI5. Usually I'm pretty good at deciphering TECSHARE's conspiracy theories but I can't figure out how this (nutildah removing neg trust) is supposed to be harming him?

[TECSHARE]

Can someone please ELI5. Usually I'm pretty good at deciphering TECSHARE's conspiracy theories but I can't figure out how this (nutildah removing neg trust) is supposed to be harming him?

Nutty no likey Tec. Soney no likey Tec. Nutty help Stoney, cause Nutty like Stoney no likey Tec.

[suchmoon]

Nutty no likey Tec. Soney no likey Tec. Nutty help Stoney, cause Nutty like Stoney no likey Tec.

And how exactly does this affect you? It sounds quite silly even by your own standards to get upset about every action that involves somebody who doesn't like you.

[TECSHARE]

Nutty no likey Tec. Soney no likey Tec. Nutty help Stoney, cause Nutty like Stoney no likey Tec.

And how exactly does this affect you? It sounds quite silly even by your own standards to get upset about every action that involves somebody who doesn't like you.

Frankly this idiot is inconsequential to me. Highlighting Nutilduuh's emotional use of the trust system to excuse sock puppeting, extortionist, trust system abusers is more of the issue.

[suchmoon]

Frankly this idiot is inconsequential to me. Highlighting Nutilduuh's emotional use of the trust system to excuse sock puppeting, extortionist, trust system abusers is more of the issue.

You haven't red-trusted StonerStanley yourself. Why is it an issue that nutildah removed the feedback? Or are you excusing the abuser too?

[TECSHARE]

You haven't red-trusted StonerStanley yourself. Why is it an issue that nutildah removed the feedback? Or are you excusing the abuser too?

No, I left him a neutral documenting his alt. I am following the objective standards I promote. Just be careful you don't puke all over yourself spinning so hard.

Nutilduuh did however leave a negative that they felt was justified, then removed it in a mutual trade. Weird how your inquiries only go in the direction that serves your vendetta just like Nutilduhh and the rest of the clown car riders.

[suchmoon]

No, I left him a neutral documenting his alt. I am following the objective standards I promote. Just be careful you don't puke all over yourself spinning so hard.

Nutilduuh did however leave a negative that they felt was justified, then removed it in a mutual trade. Weird how your inquiries only go in the direction that serves your vendetta just like Nutilduhh and the rest of the clown car riders.

What vendetta? You're the one making the contrived circular accusation of excusing "sock puppeting, extortionist, trust system abusers" merely because nutildah removed red trust. By that logic every single person on this forum is excusing "sock puppeting, extortionist, trust system abusers" because no one has posted a red trust rating (or any kind of rating) for StonerStanley about him being a "sock puppeting, extortionist, trust system abuser", including yourself.

[TECSHARE]

What vendetta? You're the one making the contrived circular accusation of excusing "sock puppeting, extortionist, trust system abusers" merely because nutildah removed red trust. By that logic every single person on this forum is excusing "sock puppeting, extortionist, trust system abusers" because no one has posted a red trust rating (or any kind of rating) for StonerStanley about him being a "sock puppeting, extortionist, trust system abuser", including yourself.

The Clowndetta™, the one you, Nutilduhh, and the same group of white faced red nosed floppy shoe wearing tards have very obviously been perpetrating for years. Everyone else didn't place the rating then remove it.

No one placed a red trust rating for him?

ABitNut   2014-07-08   Reference   "This is an alt account, so whoever you're dealing with is hiding."

Seems like you are trying awfully hard to stir up drama here. I did not say my rating was invalid to begin with -- stop putting words in my mouth. I didn't say you conceded anything -- I asked and answered a question I knew you were implying, and you still are implying.

Guess you should red tag me for it, perhaps Stanley as well.

None of this affects you whatsoever. Now man up and stop crying.

Here you are once again trying to make this into some kind of crime I perpetrated to distract from your own irrational and emotion based actions

I am not trying to do anything but hold you accountable for your actions. So this isn't what you were saying here?

My negative trust for Stanley was based on him harassing DT members. This is one of the more flimsy things to base a red trust on (in my book), and I decided to be forgiving about it...

I don't need to red tag you or Stoner for it, because unlike you I don't abuse red trust ratings. This does effect me, trust system abuse effects everyone.

[suchmoon]

No one placed a red trust rating for him?

LOL

Nice sweet cherries you picked there. Here is what I said:

no one has posted a red trust rating (or any kind of rating) for StonerStanley about him being a "sock puppeting, extortionist, trust system abuser", including yourself.

The highlighted part is what nutildah is allegedly "excusing". So why would you cut out only part of that sentence... rhetorical question. Please carry on making up bullshit accusations out of thin air.

[TECSHARE]

No one placed a red trust rating for him?

LOL

Nice sweet cherries you picked there. Here is what I said:

no one has posted a red trust rating (or any kind of rating) for StonerStanley about him being a "sock puppeting, extortionist, trust system abuser", including yourself.

The highlighted part is what nutildah is allegedly "excusing". So why would you cut out only part of that sentence... rhetorical question. Please carry on making up bullshit accusations out of thin air.

I see! It has to be ALL THREE otherwise it doesn't count! Careful you don't sprain your ankle doing all those backflips.

I am not trying to do anything but hold you accountable for your actions.

Okay, have fun.

So this isn't what you were saying here?

My negative trust for Stanley was based on him harassing DT members. This is one of the more flimsy things to base a red trust on (in my book), and I decided to be forgiving about it...

flimsy ≠ frivolous

"Flimsy" means something that is a tag-able offense but easily forgivable. Stanley didn't scam anyone so the danger presented by removing my red trust on him is low to non-existent. "Frivolous" would mean leaving a red trust for somebody because they called you an incel.

I don't need to red tag you or Stoner for it, because unlike you I don't abuse red trust ratings. This does effect me, trust system abuse effects everyone.

1. That's your opinion. I would say the red trust you left on Vod is abuse.
2. Explain how it affects you. Or don't. I don't actually care.

Ah, yes, it is all very technical and nuanced. So nuanced it can mean opposing ideas at the same time. I already explained how it effects me. Weird that you have given negative ratings simply for having alt accounts in the past, but those were people who disagreed with you, so that was ok. This person disagrees with me, so best to overlook it since it serves your personal goals and soothes your emotional voids at the expense of the trust system and overall community.

[marlboroza]

Nutty no likey Tec. Soney no likey Tec. Nutty help Stoney, cause Nutty like Stoney no likey Tec.

Techy no likey Stoney. Techy like nutildah red trust. Techy say no word. Nutildah remove red trust. Techy no like nutilda remove red trust. Techy upset now.

[suchmoon]

I see! It has to be ALL THREE otherwise it doesn't count! Careful you don't sprain your ankle doing all those backflips.

Those were your own words sparky. It's not really my fault that you're trying so hard to make shit up that you inevitably go overboard. Fortunately you have no capacity to step back and admit that you've been wrong so it's always fun to watch you make more shit up to cover up the shit made up previously.

So to recap: nutildah is excusing grave crimes (or at least two of three grave crimes if we buy your latest excuse) that no one else really gives a fuck about, including yourself. Since when is nutildah obligated to be your personal enforcer?

[TECSHARE]

Those were your own words sparky. It's not really my fault that you're trying so hard to make shit up that you inevitably go overboard. Fortunately you have no capacity to step back and admit that you've been wrong so it's always fun to watch you make more shit up to cover up the shit made up previously.

So to recap: nutildah is excusing grave crimes (or at least two of three grave crimes if we buy your latest excuse) that no one else really gives a fuck about, including yourself. Since when is nutildah obligated to be your personal enforcer?

Yes, my words, which you accused me of cherry picking by making a statement. Weird, I didn't know one could cherry pick one's own statement as they make it, but ok. Grave crimes? No. very clearly documented abuses in public? Absolutely. Who said I didn't give a fuck? So because I don't abuse the trust system like you all that means I don't give a fuck?

Nutilduuuh is not obligated to do anything, however the fact that StonerStanley has a very clear vendetta against me was more than enough reason for Nutilduuh to cut them some slack. If they had a vendetta against you for example, that never would have happened, hence my raising the issue that Nutilduuuh uses the trust system as a toy to suit their own personal goals at the cost of the overall community, much like the rest of the parrots squawking up this thread.

[suchmoon]

Who said I didn't give a fuck? So because I don't abuse the trust system like you all that means I don't give a fuck?

Does that mean red trust for those "abuses" would be abuse of the trust system? But somehow nutildah removing red trust is also abuse of the trust system?

It's almost as if you have a grudge against nutildah and try to twist anything he does into some sort of misconduct.

[marlboroza]

Nutilduuuh uses the trust system as a toy to suit their own personal goals at the cost of the overall community

You mean like when you included account BitcoinSupremo because you don't like some users and those users ended up DT negative because of your actions?

Or your abusive DT manipulation with reciprocal inclusions for your own personal goals? You are not really the one who should lecture others about trust system and scream "abuse".