TECSHARE (OP)
In memoriam
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3318
Merit: 1958
First Exclusion Ever
|
|
June 12, 2020, 07:03:53 PM |
|
Does that mean red trust for those "abuses" would be abuse of the trust system? But somehow nutildah removing red trust is also abuse of the trust system?
It's almost as if you have a grudge against nutildah and try to twist anything he does into some sort of misconduct. That really depends on who's standards you are judging by. I chose not to use red trust, Nutilduuuuuh did. This is independent of other trust system abuses perpetrated by all of the loudest parrots in this thread. Yes, I AM the one twisting everything into some kind of misconduct, such behavior you, Nutilduuuh, and Bozoza are all above doing amirite? Nutilduuuh uses the trust system as a toy to suit their own personal goals at the cost of the overall community
You mean like when you included account BitcoinSupremo because you don't like some users and those users ended up DT negative because of your actions? Or your abusive DT manipulation with reciprocal inclusions for your own personal goals? You are not really the one who should lecture others about trust system and scream "abuse". Speaking of trust system abuse...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Each block is stacked on top of the previous one. Adding another block to the top makes all lower blocks more difficult to remove: there is more "weight" above each block. A transaction in a block 6 blocks deep (6 confirmations) will be very difficult to remove.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
marlboroza
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1932
Merit: 2270
|
|
June 12, 2020, 07:20:08 PM |
|
That really depends on who's standards you are judging by. I chose not to use red trust, Nutilduuuuuh did. This is independent of other trust system abuses perpetrated by all of the loudest parrots in this thread. Yes, I AM the one twisting everything into some kind of misconduct, such behavior you, Nutilduuuh, and Bozoza are all above doing amirite?
Lets try different approach here. Do you think nutildah abused trust when he tagged StonerStanley? If you do, why didn't you call it abuse back then? If you don't think it was abuse, why don't you tag account yourself? You mean like when you included account BitcoinSupremo because you don't like some users and those users ended up DT negative because of your actions?
Or your abusive DT manipulation with reciprocal inclusions for your own personal goals? You are not really the one who should lecture others about trust system and scream "abuse".
Speaking of trust system abuse... Fixed that link for ya, shill.
|
|
|
|
suchmoon
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3654
Merit: 8922
https://bpip.org
|
|
June 12, 2020, 09:16:33 PM |
|
Does that mean red trust for those "abuses" would be abuse of the trust system? But somehow nutildah removing red trust is also abuse of the trust system?
It's almost as if you have a grudge against nutildah and try to twist anything he does into some sort of misconduct. That really depends on who's standards you are judging by. I chose not to use red trust, Nutilduuuuuh did. This is independent of other trust system abuses perpetrated by all of the loudest parrots in this thread. Yes, I AM the one twisting everything into some kind of misconduct, such behavior you, Nutilduuuh, and Bozoza are all above doing amirite? So which standards are we using here? Certainly not your guild's - I don't see anything there about removal of red trust being considered as abuse. Did you just invent a new standard for nutildah?
|
|
|
|
Vod
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3696
Merit: 3070
Licking my boob since 1970
|
|
June 12, 2020, 10:04:04 PM |
|
Maybe Techy could supply a list of his standards and which apply to people he likes vs dislikes.
All these standards are confusing - we need an oversight committee to create a new classification for these standards. :/
|
https://nastyscam.com - landing page up https://vod.fan - advanced image hosting - coming soon! OGNasty has early onset dementia; keep this in mind when discussing his past actions.
|
|
|
suchmoon
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3654
Merit: 8922
https://bpip.org
|
|
June 13, 2020, 12:08:24 AM |
|
Maybe Techy could supply a list of his standards and which apply to people he likes vs dislikes.
I suspect it's much simpler than that. If TECSHARE doesn't like you - you're not gonna be compliant with his standards no matter what you do. It doesn't even matter if any standards exist, he'll just scream "abuse" if you post red trust, don't post red trust, remove red trust, include/exclude/uninclude/unexclude people, report or don't report posts to moderators, etc.
|
|
|
|
TECSHARE (OP)
In memoriam
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3318
Merit: 1958
First Exclusion Ever
|
|
June 15, 2020, 07:21:42 PM |
|
Maybe Techy could supply a list of his standards and which apply to people he likes vs dislikes.
I suspect it's much simpler than that. If TECSHARE doesn't like you - you're not gonna be compliant with his standards no matter what you do. It doesn't even matter if any standards exist, he'll just scream "abuse" if you post red trust, don't post red trust, remove red trust, include/exclude/uninclude/unexclude people, report or don't report posts to moderators, etc. I am being perfectly consistent. Leaving a red rating for them wasn't right to begin with, but Nutilduuh doesn't agree. Removing the rating in exchange for clearing their own and because the enemy of my enemy is my friend type of logic is also abusive. If Nutilduuh thought the rating was valid and was needed to prevent the user from harming others, removing it in exchange to get their own removed is not right either. The contradiction is his, not mine. You all have fun doing your clown dance.
|
|
|
|
marlboroza
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1932
Merit: 2270
|
|
June 15, 2020, 08:07:54 PM |
|
Leaving a red rating for them wasn't right to begin with
But you didn't complain back then and we all know how much you love nutildah, and now you are complaining because nutildah removed something you think it was wrong. Seems you liked that feedback, that's why you kept very silent about it and now you are upset just because you don't see it any more. Here, take a look: I tagged this guy
Troll didn't say a word, that's it.
|
|
|
|
Vod
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3696
Merit: 3070
Licking my boob since 1970
|
|
June 15, 2020, 11:15:04 PM |
|
I am being perfectly consistent. Leaving a red rating for them wasn't right to begin with, but Nutilduuh doesn't agree. Removing the rating in exchange for clearing their own and because the enemy of my enemy is my friend type of logic is also abusive. If Nutilduuh thought the rating was valid and was needed to prevent the user from harming others, removing it in exchange to get their own removed is not right either. The contradiction is his, not mine. You all have fun doing your clown dance.
You are being consistent at abusing trust. You keep offering to stop pretending to be a doctor if I removed my trust against you. That is also a retarded attempt at extortion, as the feedback I have left for you is consistent with yours.
|
https://nastyscam.com - landing page up https://vod.fan - advanced image hosting - coming soon! OGNasty has early onset dementia; keep this in mind when discussing his past actions.
|
|
|
nutildah
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2982
Merit: 7974
|
|
June 16, 2020, 04:37:45 AM |
|
Removing the rating in exchange for clearing their own and because the enemy of my enemy is my friend type of logic is also abusive. If Nutilduuh thought the rating was valid and was needed to prevent the user from harming others, removing it in exchange to get their own removed is not right either. The contradiction is his, not mine. You all have fun doing your clown dance.
Since my words clearly don't mean anything to you, let's try responding to your post using some of your words. There you go again pretending to Ms. Cleo claiming you can read my mind and intent.
Yes, string together some more assumptions Ms. Cleo. Keep trying until something sticks.
WAAAAA people I don't like get to have a say in the system! ONLY ME AND MY FRIENDS SHOULD HAVE A SAY!
You asserting your assumptions to be factual when it is not, does not make my denial of it a lie.
|
|
|
|
TECSHARE (OP)
In memoriam
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3318
Merit: 1958
First Exclusion Ever
|
|
June 20, 2020, 11:50:51 PM |
|
[NO U] You are being consistent at abusing trust. You keep offering to stop pretending to be a doctor if I removed my trust against you. That is also a retarded attempt at extortion, as the feedback I have left for you is consistent with yours. Feel free to quote some abusive trust ratings I have left Vod, it seems every time I ask you to back up your assertions you find something else to focus on.
|
|
|
|
|