<...> I still do not understand why there is an account restriction on certain parts of the forum <...>
The rank requirements were lower to begin with, and you were not even required to be a Jr. Member to post in Serious Discussion to begin with. It didn’t take long (less than a day) though to see a bunch of low quality content that moved the rank requirement up one degree:
I created two boards:
-
Serious discussion. No limit on topic, but moderation of on-topicness and general sanity will be extra harsh. No advertising of any kind. Signatures are not displayed.
-
Ivory Tower. As above, but you must be at least a Member in order to post there.
Currently these boards are not treated specially in the activity calculation. I'm currently feeling that:
- Removing them totally from the activity calculation is kind of unfair to posters there.
- Allowing them just to activate a potential-activity period isn't much different from treating them normally for activity.
- Treating them normally for activity won't be so bad, maybe.
But we'll see how it goes. These boards are largely experimental.
Update:
I see that newbies were already posting junk in Serious Discussion, so I made changes:
- The member limitations are moved up one rank. You must be a Jr Member to post in Serious Discussion and a Full Member to post in Ivory Tower
- Posts in Serious Discussion only activate an potential-activity period. They do not increase your post count.
- Posts in Ivory Tower neither activate a potential-activity period nor increase your post count.
Bear in mind that Jr. Member did not require merits until the 17/09/2018, so it was a pretty simple barrier to surpass until then (see
Enhanced newbie restrictions & requirements for Jr. Members).