LONG NETWORK on bitcoin blockchain with secret correspondence and marketplace

[hui.long]

Is this designed as a replacement for telegram? Nice alternative encrypted messenger. Cant be that this one will kill telegram or even vie for its marketshare but the attempt to make something truly decentralized where the process of maintaining correspondence can not be tampered with nor bruteforced is worth laudation. In information era privacy is something u gotta care about.

Messenger its just part of LONG function. Using 256 symbol string you can build in blockchain social networks, lotteries, games, etc.

And here is simple LONG blockchain lottery.


We propose to test the transparent lottery based on the LONG blockchain, in order to check the honesty of which you do not need to be a specialist.
You just have to guess the last hash digits of any 10K block.
For example, the hash of block 320,000 was 00000000000003334ec385f285ec04ebfddfdcb611f6959c9d1bca467453a433

Thus, the winning combination is 3 a 4 3 3
And if you matched all 5 out of 5 numbers in this order, you would win the jackpot.
For example, a ticket with a prediction abc33 guessed 2 numbers out of 5.
And ticket 1a43f guessed 3 numbers out of 5.

To participate in the lottery, simply send 100 LONG to 1BoJNSyhNPH79Av4e4GrhkzPV4ppPJFd55
up to 329,990 blocks and a message consisting of 5 numbers or letters a, b, c, d, e or f.
The last 5 digits of block 330,000 hash would be a winning combination. The winnings will be paid to the wallet from which the forecast came.

Pay table.
guessed 2 numbers out of 5 - win x2
3 numbers out of 5 guessed - win x500
guessed 4 numbers out of 5 - win x10000
guessed 5 out of 5 numbers - Jackpot Win!

The entire balance of the lottery wallet is the jackpot. Except for 2%, which goes to the development of LONG.
You can check the balance of the lottery wallet in the explorer at any time.

[1715293431]

1715293431

[1715293431]

1715293431

[1715293431]

1715293431

[drNeubauer2020]

Is this designed as a replacement for telegram? Nice alternative encrypted messenger. Cant be that this one will kill telegram or even vie for its marketshare but the attempt to make something truly decentralized where the process of maintaining correspondence can not be tampered with nor bruteforced is worth laudation. In information era privacy is something u gotta care about.

Long network has its own niche in the market.  Popularity will come, I'm sure.

[hui.long]

Now you can buy and sell LONG on WhiteBit exchange

https://whitebit.com/trade/LONG_USDT

[SteepPepper]

LONG COIN on the Largest European Exchange. It falls under the legislation that is comfortable for cryptocurrency. Official announcement tomorrow
https://whitebit.com/trade/LONG_USDT
Hurry up to mine today - tomorrow it will be too late;)

[steklomoy]

LONG COIN on the Largest European Exchange. It falls under the legislation that is comfortable for cryptocurrency. Official announcement tomorrow
https://whitebit.com/trade/LONG_USDT
Hurry up to mine today - tomorrow it will be too late;)

Will there be more trading pairs such as Ethereum or Bitcoin?

[SteepPepper]

https://medium.com/whitebit/long-listing-92cb650480c6

[hui.long]

LONG COIN on the Largest European Exchange. It falls under the legislation that is comfortable for cryptocurrency. Official announcement tomorrow
https://whitebit.com/trade/LONG_USDT
Hurry up to mine today - tomorrow it will be too late;)

Will there be more trading pairs such as Ethereum or Bitcoin?

Wait for marketing campaign first.

[SteepPepper]

Voting for halving at address 19ork7ToayWSkdSY3kmmjAxNyTX4YfrJ7E
Voting format: one message from a unique outgoing address to a voting address containing one digit: 0.5 or 1 or 1.5 or 2 and so on. This is the halving interval (halving the reward) expressed in years.
To observe the voting, import the private key of the address 19ork7ToayWSkdSY3kmmjAxNyTX4YfrJ7E
Import to be performed in the debug console of the standard wallet (ctrl + shif + c):
importprivkey KwrdUHWdpDjvqAUFdWNbS4g5pXsHwvHkb6PMNBHc98FYXn2mZGQT "Halving_Vote"
Attention! only unique outgoing addresses will be counted!
Voting time expires when a representative number of votes is collected (at least 1000)

[Daltonik]

It's not a bad idea to hold a vote on the blockchain about holding a long halving and put an end to it for a while. Indeed halving can have a positive trend on the price of the coin given that not so long ago LONG was listed on the exchange https://whitebit.com/ru/trade/LONG_USDT with the current reward of 10,000 long miners for a block found, the price on the exchange is still very low, perhaps passing through halving will be able to spur interest in the coin and significantly increase the period of its viability. Whether this happens or not is up to the community, good luck to everyone.

[Sirait]

^ It seems that it would be better if you made it into a website that is easily accessible by people. Even for me who has been in crypto for several years, the appearance of the website confuses me. 

[Daltonik]

^ It seems that it would be better if you made it into a website that is easily accessible by people. Even for me who has been in crypto for several years, the appearance of the website confuses me. 

The site was updated just need to fix the first post to the Creator of the topic, but he alone can not just have time to be everywhere at the same time. I think everything will fall into place over time, everything goes very slowly in the crypto industry, especially when one person is engaged in development on their own enthusiasm. And so here is the updated site https://longcoin.online

[SteepPepper]

First ever blockchain vote

[Daltonik]

I don't understand the lack of acceptance of the halving idea, although the number of votes that took part in the vote is negligible. What makes a coin valuable? anything but a giant reward for the extracted block 10,000 Long, the transaction fee in the long network is 1 Long, if you send a message, the maximum transaction fee will be 64 Long for the extracted block the miner receives 10,000 Long the first block was extracted 1 year 5 months and 19 days ago http://longchain.crypton.cf/block/0000005cf17e116028ad5579c5af20d83c91df874d6aa675f22cde8634422d02
To date, 326,985 blocks have been mined, which corresponds to an issue of 3,269,850,000 Long or approximately 6,340,000 Long per day. How much, and in that time has distributed the coin among users as now holders Long, I think them not so much, the way it would be nice to render the wallets of holders of Long what would really represent on the distribution of coins, and since this presentation is not, and to talk about the increased adoption of Long does not make sense. Reducing the mining reward would probably attract new users to mine or buy coins. Even a simple statement about the upcoming reduction of the block mining reward would have already pushed the price up and attracted attention. However, this is the case of the community, which I repeat once again is not so great, and this is evident from the number of votes of which only 18 is sad.

[drNeubauer2020]

I don't understand the lack of acceptance of the halving idea, although the number of votes that took part in the vote is negligible. What makes a coin valuable? anything but a giant reward for the extracted block 10,000 Long, the transaction fee in the long network is 1 Long, if you send a message, the maximum transaction fee will be 64 Long for the extracted block the miner receives 10,000 Long the first block was extracted 1 year 5 months and 19 days ago http://longchain.crypton.cf/block/0000005cf17e116028ad5579c5af20d83c91df874d6aa675f22cde8634422d02
To date, 326,985 blocks have been mined, which corresponds to an issue of 3,269,850,000 Long or approximately 6,340,000 Long per day. How much, and in that time has distributed the coin among users as now holders Long, I think them not so much, the way it would be nice to render the wallets of holders of Long what would really represent on the distribution of coins, and since this presentation is not, and to talk about the increased adoption of Long does not make sense. Reducing the mining reward would probably attract new users to mine or buy coins. Even a simple statement about the upcoming reduction of the block mining reward would have already pushed the price up and attracted attention. However, this is the case of the community, which I repeat once again is not so great, and this is evident from the number of votes of which only 18 is sad.

Development is more important.
Fuck halving.

[Daltonik]

Development is more important.
Fuck halving.

How can halving interfere with development? Show the statistics of the growth of long owners, the development is driven by the interest of investors, tell us how the halving of the block reward from 10,000 to 5,000 Long, which is already excessive, can prevent this? There is not even a growth of hashrate in the long network after listing on WhiteBit. The development of the project is led by the emergence of new features and services, but not by flooding the circulating coin supply with an inflated issue. But in the end it's up to the developer, I'm just voicing my thoughts.

[SteepPepper]

Tuning options for long mining

minner command: minerd -a sha256d -o stratum+tcp://longnomp.crypton.cf:3333 -u <you wallet address> -p d=200000,md=100000
where is the tuning option in the password field: 200k - desired difficulty (d=200000), 100k - minimum difficulty (md=100000)

[Evgen Kakoito]

I don't understand the lack of acceptance of the halving idea, although the number of votes that took part in the vote is negligible. What makes a coin valuable? anything but a giant reward for the extracted block 10,000 Long, the transaction fee in the long network is 1 Long, if you send a message, the maximum transaction fee will be 64 Long for the extracted block the miner receives 10,000 Long the first block was extracted 1 year 5 months and 19 days ago http://longchain.crypton.cf/block/0000005cf17e116028ad5579c5af20d83c91df874d6aa675f22cde8634422d02
To date, 326,985 blocks have been mined, which corresponds to an issue of 3,269,850,000 Long or approximately 6,340,000 Long per day. How much, and in that time has distributed the coin among users as now holders Long, I think them not so much, the way it would be nice to render the wallets of holders of Long what would really represent on the distribution of coins, and since this presentation is not, and to talk about the increased adoption of Long does not make sense. Reducing the mining reward would probably attract new users to mine or buy coins. Even a simple statement about the upcoming reduction of the block mining reward would have already pushed the price up and attracted attention. However, this is the case of the community, which I repeat once again is not so great, and this is evident from the number of votes of which only 18 is sad.

Now recalculate your "inventions" taking into account the number of bitcoin and longcoin bits. Especially for the little ones:

• 1. There are 100 million satoshi in one bitcoin
• 2. One block was 25 bitcoins (after 12.5 and 6.25)
• 3. There was 2.5 billion (after 1.25 and 0.625 billion) in one bitcoin block

One block, Karl! This is the same as the entire emission of Longcoins for the year. With a small difference - Bitcoin coins are needed only "for money", while Long coins are needed to transfer messages and content. No coin will be able to repeat the success of bitcoin "as money", therefore, pushing to inflate the value for the coin, cutting emission into nothing, which has a completely different purpose, is nonsense.

How could it be easier to say. Some half-dead coins even have bunches of developers every 2-3 months, beautiful (design) roadmaps cause piggy delight of the public. The ways of the crowd are inscrutable. I also laughed for a long time at Doge, until ...

[Daltonik]

Now recalculate your "inventions" taking into account the number of bitcoin and longcoin bits. Especially for the little ones:

• 1. There are 100 million satoshi in one bitcoin
• 2. One block was 25 bitcoins (after 12.5 and 6.25)
• 3. There was 2.5 billion (after 1.25 and 0.625 billion) in one bitcoin block

One block, Karl! This is the same as the entire emission of Longcoins for the year. With a small difference - Bitcoin coins are needed only "for money", while Long coins are needed to transfer messages and content. No coin will be able to repeat the success of bitcoin "as money", therefore, pushing to inflate the value for the coin, cutting emission into nothing, which has a completely different purpose, is nonsense.

How could it be easier to say. Some half-dead coins even have bunches of developers every 2-3 months, beautiful (design) roadmaps cause piggy delight of the public. The ways of the crowd are inscrutable. I also laughed for a long time at Doge, until ...

Ok, from your logic, it should be understood that you mean accepting 1 Long=1 Satoshi ? When you parsed the reward for the extracted block, then the reward for the extracted block should be 100,000,000 and by analogy you give the reward for the block should start with 5,000,000,000 Long so it turns out ?  In no case did I mean the amount of Satoshi in bitcoin, it doesn't make sense at all, I was talking about a reasonable approach to inflation that's what I was talking about. Far-reaching plans and healthy ambitions for a project are always good, you just need to be a little realistic, and not reduce everything to what coin is divisible and what is not. If you do not mean Long as a means of payment, but consider it only as a mechanism for creating and transmitting messages and content, then you should have started by placing it on airdrop platforms and not on exchanges. It seems to me that there is no contradiction in the fact that a coin can perform many functions, such as payments, sending messages and content, a means for finding consensus, etc.

[Evgen Kakoito]

Ok, from your logic, it should be understood that you mean accepting 1 Long=1 Satoshi ? When you parsed the reward for the extracted block, then the reward for the extracted block should be 100,000,000 and by analogy you give the reward for the block should start with 5,000,000,000 Long so it turns out ?  In no case did I mean the amount of Satoshi in bitcoin, it doesn't make sense at all, I was talking about a reasonable approach to inflation that's what I was talking about. Far-reaching plans and healthy ambitions for a project are always good, you just need to be a little realistic, and not reduce everything to what coin is divisible and what is not. If you do not mean Long as a means of payment, but consider it only as a mechanism for creating and transmitting messages and content, then you should have started by placing it on airdrop platforms and not on exchanges. It seems to me that there is no contradiction in the fact that a coin can perform many functions, such as payments, sending messages and content, a means for finding consensus, etc.

This is not "my logic" - these are facts. The emission of coins is already much smaller, limited and known, this alone creates restrictions on circulation, value.
99,(9)% of the price inflation of most coins is a "hype", a successful attraction of attention and coincidence (stars) of the community's favor to a particular coin or developer. Otherwise, the base price will be approximately equal to the price of electricity for mining. It must be remembered that 10,000 coins = 10,000 messages from one block, if you also actively send pictures or sound - even less.

[Daltonik]

It must be remembered that 10,000 coins = 10,000 messages from one block, if you also actively send pictures or sound - even less.

You are not carefully reading the technical description of the coin, one user can send 10,000 messages in one unit and pay for it 10,000 Long block is limited not by the number of messages and volume of 64kB, if that is not done at the 10,000 different addresses at a time, but I think the average user is unlikely under. But you can send 10,000 messages in 10,000 blocks, or 156 messages using the maximum amount of 64kB across 156 blocks(The limit on the amount of data transaction is 64kB (max fee is 64 LONG).