A Very Important Advice for Devs

[harapan]

I was surprised if Hotbit also entered the list of bad exchanges to do IEO, because I have not heard negative news about the exchange (maybe I missed the news). I also hope that new developers can read this thread so that they do not fail in doing IEO and not waste money to pay for exchanges that are full of crap

[Kez1817]

 I believed that every project DEVs knows best and better to list on top exchanges but mostly Devs are looking for a cheap fee kind of exchange and they don't even think what will be the outcome of their project if their tokens are listed on those  bad exchanges with bad reputation. Listing on top exchanges is cost very high and i think they can't afford to pay that's why they just choose the cheaper one.

[Dessy88]

I wonder if the growing list of complaints about this exchange by many people is growing so we need to keep ourselves away from all these exchanges. I think if a project has its own strengths and funds then they will never accept all these fake exchanges respectively they want to reach the maximum investors.

[CashbackLover]

I believe that not all developers are victim to small exchanges without knowing how bad those exchanges are , I know that Coinmarketcap is misleading because that website rated bad exchanges as high quality exchanges but most developers know how bad p2pb2b exchange is, devs have bad plans for their project so it doesn't worry them.

[fullhdpixel]

Yobit should be in the first place they are the number one who started the bot in pumping shitcoins in the market and they do have bad supports and so many complaints in the scam section, some of the exchanges are new but Yobit is very notorious they have a lot of complaints since five years ago.

They also send me email regarding some pumps which I don't know how it works but I do remember getting that type of emails before I just unsubscribed from their emails.

I feel so bad when I see yobit because it looked like a decent and strong exchange when it started and never had bugs issues or anything but they got into this ICO shit and now they have destroyed their portal, reputation and most important they have lost the trust of their users.

Their support you mentioned is a joke in all honestly because they don't care about your questions rather give delayed and vague replies.

[r32godzilla]

Developers are coding the project, they are not responsible for token listing.  And secondly, I would like to mention that it is a pity that the most valuable thing on project is a token listing on a good and reputable exchange instead of developing something useful and worthy. 

[Dondeon]

I still don't know why some projects decide to list on those shit exchanges. Many at times, I keep wondering what could have lead them to that kind of decision. If you really care about your project genuinely, you will not ruin your project by listing on those useless exchanges.

[cryyppton1]

 The problem with developers is that they go for a cheap exchange to list their projects for IEO and at the end of the day such Exchanges do not have much to offer . 
I don't want to believe that those developers do not have the idea that such low rated Exchanges won't bring anything tangible to their projects but because they either do not have enough fund to list on a better exchange or do not meet the criteria for that they resort to what they can afford and end up losing .

[Pasutinmeur]

I thought that Vindax not working anymore after they scammed traders and secondly, developers do not have to do something with exchange listing, developers code the blockchain project.  

The decision whether the coin will be listed or not depend on the team from the exchange site. If you were seeing it correctly and the team has no power when it comes to the exchange site. If they didn't meet the requirement and then they can only put their token into the crap exchange site.

[irixo10]

This is just the truth but they won't listen to the advice instead they will come up with reasons to justify their actions. Truthfully, I used to imagine how a team will strive to build a platform then list the token on exchanges which can kill it, this then makes me understand that only team with bad motives do this. Good team always try exchanges which can help their course just as they (exchanges) has helped others. Lastly, i think the notorious of the exchanges are P2PB2B, Vindax, Latoken and Dobi.

[pikkie]

I thought that Vindax not working anymore after they scammed traders and secondly, developers do not have to do something with exchange listing, developers code the blockchain project.  

The decision whether the coin will be listed or not depend on the team from the exchange site. If you were seeing it correctly and the team has no power when it comes to the exchange site. If they didn't meet the requirement and then they can only put their token into the crap exchange site.

well that is the bad side and when you already know that you should be able to avoid projects like that because if you still participate in it will make you lose money because you are trapped and unable to withdraw your assets.

[H1N1]

I you have a great project, then you should list IEO on the top reputable exchange, otherwise people will think your project is not worth.
Listing on top exchange IEO means the dev is very serious to run the project, without playing with investor's money.

[disconnectme]

I don't know what positive contributions these platforms have on the space than robbing people of their Bitcoin. I know most of these exchanges do pump and dump but it is just too obvious on these exchanges. I will advice people to move their money out of these exchanges, just look at what happens at Coss.io recently 

[torrantz]

I don't know what positive contributions these platforms have on the space than robbing people of their Bitcoin. I know most of these exchanges do pump and dump but it is just too obvious on these exchanges. I will advice people to move their money out of these exchanges, just look at what happens at Coss.io recently 

When their first appearance I though they were an exchange that's supposedly giving a less known project a place for it to create their own IEO but turns out they just list all the trash coin regardless of the serioussness the project has and at that point i totally lost the respect.

[robelneo]

I believe that not all developers are victim to small exchanges without knowing how bad those exchanges are , I know that Coinmarketcap is misleading because that website rated bad exchanges as high quality exchanges but most developers know how bad p2pb2b exchange is, devs have bad plans for their project so it doesn't worry them.

I hope there will be a time that both the top aggregator like Coinmarketcap and Coingecko do not list exchanges with a lot of complaints and reports P2B2B and other exchanges P2B2B, continue listing bad projects like Liker who scammed investors and bounty hunters by changing their smart contract without prior announcement in any social media.
Once you see these exchanges in any project better think your option if you will still continue to support these projects.

[Greatdev]

Some projects advisors are the real culprits of dead projects sometimes, ive seen people have advice to bitwings for example, that they shouldn't use p2pb2b exchange to raise fund but they say they knew what's best for them and in the end they never raised half of their soft cap target, now they plan to use binance, something they should have done in the first place

[Psynthax]

Some projects advisors are the real culprits of dead projects sometimes, ive seen people have advice to bitwings for example, that they shouldn't use p2pb2b exchange to raise fund but they say they knew what's best for them and in the end they never raised half of their soft cap target, now they plan to use binance, something they should have done in the first place

I just heard that for first time. its really baffling if the advisors that supposed to bring to project into a success by giving meaningful advice turns out they are the one that gives such a bad advice. those low tier exchange although cheap not really worth it because they not only make supposedly success project to their demise but stain their reputation forever.

[bison]

Some projects advisors are the real culprits of dead projects sometimes, ive seen people have advice to bitwings for example, that they shouldn't use p2pb2b exchange to raise fund but they say they knew what's best for them and in the end they never raised half of their soft cap target, now they plan to use binance, something they should have done in the first place

I just heard that for first time. its really baffling if the advisors that supposed to bring to project into a success by giving meaningful advice turns out they are the one that gives such a bad advice. those low tier exchange although cheap not really worth it because they not only make supposedly success project to their demise but stain their reputation forever.

if they are short of funds, they should be better off talking about cooperation or ways to get a more appropriate exchange. it is related to the market type of their project. if choosing a small exchange as an excuse is a first step and planning for a bigger exchange then that is a lie.

[TopT3ns]

Some projects advisors are the real culprits of dead projects sometimes, ive seen people have advice to bitwings for example, that they shouldn't use p2pb2b exchange to raise fund but they say they knew what's best for them and in the end they never raised half of their soft cap target, now they plan to use binance, something they should have done in the first place

if you know some advisors from a project sometimes they receive payments or bribes to make this project successful and cover up the ugliness of the ongoing project, maybe you can avoid the project with an advisory system like that.

[erikoy]

Some projects advisors are the real culprits of dead projects sometimes, ive seen people have advice to bitwings for example, that they shouldn't use p2pb2b exchange to raise fund but they say they knew what's best for them and in the end they never raised half of their soft cap target, now they plan to use binance, something they should have done in the first place

if you know some advisors from a project sometimes they receive payments or bribes to make this project successful and cover up the ugliness of the ongoing project, maybe you can avoid the project with an advisory system like that.

It is always good to punish and let the OP decide wether to to join the forum again or not.

I know that swimming.is.a.very good for.sensual. So, guess it.is time for them.to.level.a.good besides no, foe.noe.but having enh..PUNISHMENT do you take.some.thime also to bet in yhe futr.Let us be that conservative and reoirce full relation to.blockain ro.