New World: Global or National? Governance with Blockchain

[Mr. Answer]

New World: Global or National?

History can record these days as "revolution". Name of this revolution may be corana or pandemic. Most important areas triggered by the disease are: Economy, Education, Trade and Habits. Our world has progressed rapidly towards becoming global until today. The world is in a dilemma after today. Will the New World be Global or National?

Corona has changed all our habits, our lifestyle. This will not be the old world after today. So what kind of world is waiting for us from now on. Will countries close their borders now? Or will they fight together against common threats? The world's largest economies have almost closed their borders. China and European countries have banned travel. America had already started to build walls. The tourism industry is on the verge of collapse. İnsanlar yurt dışına gitmek istemiyor. They don't even want to go to their neighbor. The cargo and transportation industry is still questionable. In short, every sector and habit that brought nations together started to shake. I think the world of the future is left to nationalists. How about you? What do you think? Maybe I'm wrong. Perhaps states will understand that they live on the same ship in the world. They will develop common responses to common threats. (Global Warming, Environmental Pollution, Population Growth, International Terrorism, Epidemic Diseases...) They will try to make the world more livable together. Maybe...

Governance with Blockchain

One of the important things that will change with Corona is our perspective on life. Most of the concepts we think are unshakable will change. The economic crisis triggered by the disease showed us the facts. Economy is based on a balloon. Central authorities are not afraid of corruption in times of crisis. Printing money: As easy as printing paper on a printing press or pressing a key on the keyboard. Technology that will form the basis of its economy in the New World: Blockchain. Large companies will be managed via blockchain. People will want to participate more in decision making mechanisms. This is called: Governance

“Governance encompasses the system by which an organisation is controlled and operates, and the mechanisms by which it, and its people, are held to account.”* Governance must be used in public administration, even if the new world is national. Enabling people to participate fairly in the system is only possible with Blockchain system. A more decentralized world is waiting for us in the future.

Sources: [Medium] [Linkedin] [Dkbb] [Slideplayer] [Fusunozulke] [Governanceinstitute] [Wikipedia] [house-of-habsburg] [Unescap]

[avikz]

Will countries close their borders now? Or will they fight together against common threats?

Yes - is the answer to both of these questions. Countries have already closed their borders and imposed travel ban. At the same time, all countries are fighting their own fight against this pandemic. Rich countries are helping poor countries to get out of this situation. So the fight is everywhere to save the human race!

In short, every sector and habit that brought nations together started to shake. I think the world of the future is left to nationalists. How about you? What do you think? Maybe I'm wrong. Perhaps states will understand that they live on the same ship in the world. They will develop common responses to common threats. (Global Warming, Environmental Pollution, Population Growth, International Terrorism, Epidemic Diseases...) They will try to make the world more livable together. Maybe...

Extreme Nationalism = fascism!

US chosen Trump as their president and India chosen Modi as their Prime Minister. Both of these incidents denotes that world has already seen a rise in the Nationalist power which eventually lead to fascism, less in US but prominently in India!

I believe, we have reached such a time where a global force is needed to fight the human problem with a human way! But it looks difficult because the fascist forces are ruling the major economies, US, China, India. All of these countries are being ruled under various levels of dictatorship who came to the power by spreading hatred towards a particular religious minority. We can just hope for the best!

“Governance encompasses the system by which an organisation is controlled and operates, and the mechanisms by which it, and its people, are held to account.”* Governance must be used in public administration, even if the new world is national. Enabling people to participate fairly in the system is only possible with Blockchain system. A more decentralized world is waiting for us in the future.

Exactly that is the reason we will never see blockchain in the governance. If everything within government become transparent, how the power mongers will function?? How the bureaucrats will make money? How the politicians will take the juice out of the economy?? How the police force will indulge in illegal practices?? Do you understand the gravity of this issue?? 

[Debonaire217]

To provide the orderliness of the government and its sector, blockchain will not ever be the solution. Think of the happenings in the past, people create innovation, they make systems and processes to make every thing in order, at the same time, there are also people who are doing their best to counter attack these actions. Blockchain might show potential orderliness to make the government and its systems transparent. But if we are to think of the fact that history repeats itself, it will not be possible as the main response by the government to its implementation will be rejection.

[Mr. Answer]

Exactly that is the reason we will never see blockchain in the governance. If everything within government become transparent, how the power mongers will function?? How the bureaucrats will make money? How the politicians will take the juice out of the economy?? How the police force will indulge in illegal practices?? Do you understand the gravity of this issue?? 

Maybe not everything has to be decentralized. Transformation must be slow but strong. Some adjustments can be made by the central authority. / Thank you for your comment.

[avikz]

Exactly that is the reason we will never see blockchain in the governance. If everything within government become transparent, how the power mongers will function?? How the bureaucrats will make money? How the politicians will take the juice out of the economy?? How the police force will indulge in illegal practices?? Do you understand the gravity of this issue?? 

Maybe not everything has to be decentralized. Transformation must be slow but strong. Some adjustments can be made by the central authority. / Thank you for your comment.

You will never see a complete decentralized governance ever in your life. Because there are so many things in an efficient governance that needs to remain as classified. Some progressive governments like Japan or Germany probably will adopt the blockchain for better and transparent governance in some areas but largely you won't see much changes from majority of the other governments.

I have worked with government and beaurocrats earlier in my life. I have a macro level idea on how the system works in third world countries. Transparency is a big no-no in government offices!

[dothebeats]

Transparency will always be the key towards successful governance wherein the citizens actually help the government achieve a common goal. The problem with today's governments is that most of them are ran by traditional politicians who are so used in the ways of under-the-table dealings and corruption that's why none of them ever embrace the idea of change or innovation. With or without blockchain, if governments would be transparent enough to let people do the balance checks (South Korea and Japan are prime examples), they would be progressive as they can be as people trust them and actually help them improve.

As for a central government of the world, this would certainly not pan out knowing how countries, even in today's time, are trying to best each other in every way possible--and some would even go so far into constructing debt traps, economic sanctions and terrorism just to achieve their goal. Having the current governmental setup that we have today is the best that we can do, since in this case, territories would be better ruled and resource allocation would be a lot easier.

[Gozie51]

I think governance with blockchain would push off some old practices which where all front liners to corruption. Corruption is one big pandemic before corona virus that is striking people dead  after contact if treatment isn't given on time. I think that blockchain will work better in governance.

[Darker45]

The fast-paced globalization has made the world a single community. There are pros as there are cons, advantages as well as disadvantages. But this current pandemic is a loud and clear reminder for all of us that we have made the doors too wide open that everything is pretty much flowing in and out including what could possible destroy each of our countries. It is not only commercial trade that is thriving in a globalized world; it also includes tourism, education, health, and so on. On the negative side, however, diseases, virus, illegal stuff and all are also riding on the waves of globalization. What is happening right now is enough to make us realize that some holes have to plugged and that national causes are to be pursued and strengthened a lot more than international ones.

The economic crisis that is arising from what was initially just a health crisis has also brought us into a realization that globalization has actually made so many nations very dependent on others. We have seen how international trades are severely hampered with just a single country locking down itself. We have even seen how developed countries are all queuing up for their basic health equipment in a foreign country. Some nations are now at the mercy of other nations.

[senin]

Exactly that is the reason we will never see blockchain in the governance. If everything within government become transparent, how the power mongers will function?? How the bureaucrats will make money? How the politicians will take the juice out of the economy?? How the police force will indulge in illegal practices?? Do you understand the gravity of this issue?? 

Maybe not everything has to be decentralized. Transformation must be slow but strong. Some adjustments can be made by the central authority. / Thank you for your comment.

As long as there are sharp contradictions of interests in the economic and political sphere between states, until then we will not see the possibility of global governance of the world. At the same time, the history of the development of mankind shows that it was very rare on our planet when there were years without major wars. Therefore, in terms of managing the world in us, it is unlikely that anything will change in the near future. Unless we appreciate the positive changes in the purification of water and air on our planet after the introduction of quarantine associated with the spread of coronavirus.

[davis196]

Another one preaching about the "new world order" after the pandemic.
In my opinion,nothing will change after the pandemic is gone.Maybe the government debt will go up,the global economy will start recovering slowly,the rich will become richer,because they have bought some cheap stocks and real estate.In general,nothing will change.We can't stop globalization,all the countries depend on each other.
"Blockchain governance" is science fiction.The politicians and clerks will never let go of their power.

[Sanitough]

There will be new world order, after the pandemic, the world will be back to normal.
China have survive against covid-19 and their economy now is good, so I guess other countries are also possible doing it, it might just take time for them.

Crypto will not rule this world, it will remain in the sideline while the centralized government will continue to hold its power.

[abhiseshakana]

On behalf of humanity, all countries should work together to stem the coronavirus pandemic. Corona creates opportunities for each country to resetting their respective economies.

When the corona pandemic in China had started to turn yellow towards green and was almost over, the pandemic in other countries had just begun and was successively spreading to countries around the world. China made it into the pitstop first because it has now begun the recovery process. Each country has different timing for entering the pit stop and recovery. In the recovery process, production activities need indirect acceleration full power so when that momentum is created, because the global supply chain has not yet recovered, each country will concentrate more on meeting domestic consumption needs by maximizing its resources.

In the current conditions, the worst conditions are countries that have debts, countries that depend on dollar loans and countries that rely on imports. If the government is observant, then a country can overtake the corner because the post-pandemic handling of each country will be able to change its position on the global arena, only having to use an out of the box or even no box method. developing countries can imitate the way the United States or China with printing money to solve all economic problems.

[Averim]

With this medical crisis globalisation failed, countries in EU don't support teiself, the example of Germany, or an other example given by Spain, they bout some protection mask and as much i understand americans offer a bigger price, so things are not as they seemed.

[mindrust]

Globalism have already failed.

It failed when Trump was elected and when brexit happened. These were the major signs and Covid19 is just the final nail in its coffin.

Look at Italy. Nobody in Europe helped them. No help from Germany, no help from France... England didn't give af neither. No point in staying in EU anymore. England saw this coming long ago.

Name of the game is free for all now.

[barbara44]

Well, what else were you expecting them to do in this kind of situation? I am even pissed with the government of my country for not initiating a lockdown earlier and restricting travels; imagine they did that earlier there wouldn't be any cases at all.

But, now since they left the borders open there has been a lot of cases reported and a few deaths, though I'm very happy that lots of people have recovered from it. Everywhere should be on lockdown now and that's the best thing to do, whether people want it or not. The government and big organizations should also do their best to support the people in this difficult time.

[coolcoinz]

Globalism have already failed.

It failed when Trump was elected and when brexit happened. These were the major signs and Covid19 is just the final nail in its coffin.

Look at Italy. Nobody in Europe helped them. No help from Germany, no help from France... England didn't give af neither. No point in staying in EU anymore. England saw this coming long ago.

Name of the game is free for all now.

Because globalism has a lot to do with the orwellian vision of a communist society, where everone is supposed to be equal.
The EU was made to unite and equalize, create one big country under a central government, but it doesn't work and it will not work for the same reason why you can't ask everybody to do some physical work and get equal payment for it. Some people are strong, others are weak, some are healthy and some are not. You can't put them all in one basket and tell them to lay bricks and get $10 per hour because some clerk thought it would be a good idea.

Countries should work together for a common goal, but we shouldn't expect equality. IMO nationalism better than globalism, but we shouldn't allow to be ruled by xenophobes.

[Febo]

New World: Global or National?

World will be still global, but Country economies will be way more selfsufficient and government will own way more industries as right now. Of course such states will cost more so taxes will be higher.

[Tasrifhossain]

One of the most powerful technologies of the present day is blockchain technology.But it can be said that in the near future, the whole world will be able to bring about a change but there are some bad aspects to it, and the reason why different people are trying to present it badly to the government and that is why it is so easyNo country's government will rely solely on blockchin technology

[hatshepsut93]

One of the important things that will change with Corona is our perspective on life. Most of the concepts we think are unshakable will change. The economic crisis triggered by the disease showed us the facts. Economy is based on a balloon. Central authorities are not afraid of corruption in times of crisis. Printing money: As easy as printing paper on a printing press or pressing a key on the keyboard. Technology that will form the basis of its economy in the New World: Blockchain. Large companies will be managed via blockchain. People will want to participate more in decision making mechanisms. This is called: Governance[/size]

“Governance encompasses the system by which an organisation is controlled and operates, and the mechanisms by which it, and its people, are held to account.”* Governance must be used in public administration, even if the new world is national. Enabling people to participate fairly in the system is only possible with Blockchain system. A more decentralized world is waiting for us in the future.

Sources: [Medium] [Linkedin] [Dkbb] [Slideplayer] [Fusunozulke] [Governanceinstitute] [Wikipedia] [house-of-habsburg] [Unescap]

There won't be any big shift because of the coronavirus, this isn't the first epidemic and economic crisis in human history and it's sure not the last. Nothing changed after the 2008 crisis, or the SARS outbreak of 2004. And even if there will be some fundamental changes, it won't be about blockchain. No one cares about blockchain in the real world, and the governments are occasionally talk about it just to look progressive, but no one is going to use it.

[buwaytress]

Governance is the big problem, and even the European Commission's innovation/blockchain boss in a recent interview said so. Europe's keen on relaxed regulations for crypto, keeping it to the bare minimum of AML and fraud plus data privacy, but even with everything else, governance is the part they're facing challenges with.

Been many people try tackling this problem and even with Bitcoin we still see people disagreeing over how things happened in 2017/18 and continue to do so. Imagine politicians and bureaucrats fighting it out with developers.