Is it better process to fund rise instead ICO or IEO?

[KimmyF]

If any trusted website we could build there new project will launch by low to high target of money. Suppose one project need low 1 million and high 5 millions USD against coin supply is 50 millions. Which funds will rise, all coin distribute among all investors. Price will depends on investment. Developing and promoting coin are separate.
Edited
To know more details
Coin supply 2k and need funds 1k-2k USD, than for rise 1k funds rise coin price was 0.5USD, Same for 2k coin price was 1 USD. But coin supply is limited 2k. If any project failed to success than refund available to investor in this platform. This process is different than ICO or IEO.

[bgaf]

If any trusted website we could build there new project will launch by low to high target of money. Suppose one project need low 1 million and high 5 millions USD against coin supply is 50 millions. Which funds will rise, all coin distribute among all investors. Price will depends on investment. Developing and promoting coin are separate.

Bit confuse with the question honestly. But price will always depend on many factor such as total supply, locked tokens, how many are circulating, what will be the current price, market approach, and of course liquidity. Many aspect for building new project is a must in order to be succesful. If your gonna ask if private funding is more okay than ICO or IEO, then the answer is I am not sure. IEO help also to gather funds using public approach while private secure the money through institutions which sometime also good since there is a solidarity on decision whether to mark the market or not.

[Saisher]

If any trusted website we could build there new project will launch by low to high target of money. Suppose one project need low 1 million and high 5 millions USD against coin supply is 50 millions. Which funds will rise, all coin distribute among all investors. Price will depends on investment. Developing and promoting coin are separate.

Bro you should rewrite your thread to make it understandable, we'd like to give you a good response but we can only do so if we understand your post you can make it as simple as possible and try to get your message in a more comprehensible way, even the title needs to change.

[Lagduf]

If any trusted website we could build there new project will launch by low to high target of money. Suppose one project need low 1 million and high 5 millions USD against coin supply is 50 millions. Which funds will rise, all coin distribute among all investors. Price will depends on investment. Developing and promoting coin are separate.

We can't even understand what are you talking about. If you are talking about you can build your platform on the place that you have also raised the funds for your platform and IEO was also offering the same and you can see binance chain , you can also create your token there as an alternative chain. I prefer any new apps must be decentralized.

[suryapro]

Because in my opinion the success of the project that was built was supported by several factors and is open from the amount of funds they have. even if they have large funds and a large supply of tokens, but not having a good program, team and product will certainly be difficult to get interest from investors.

[zaim7413]

Because in my opinion the success of the project that was built was supported by several factors and is open from the amount of funds they have. even if they have large funds and a large supply of tokens, but not having a good program, team and product will certainly be difficult to get interest from investors.

Right, and even so many projects that after experiencing success but died slowly due to lack of behavior of their products on the market, and the absence of new investors who came in to support the project program in order to continue to survive the project in the long term.

[lepbagong]

Because in my opinion the success of the project that was built was supported by several factors and is open from the amount of funds they have. even if they have large funds and a large supply of tokens, but not having a good program, team and product will certainly be difficult to get interest from investors.

Right, and even so many projects that after experiencing success but died slowly due to lack of behavior of their products on the market, and the absence of new investors who came in to support the project program in order to continue to survive the project in the long term.

many projects have gone well but after feeling that what has been done is profitable enough they start to let their down or deliberately let the project run naturally, so that it appears that the project is no longer attractive to investors, eventually a well-packaged project collapses. and not infrequently they make new projects again, is it because they make new projects more profitable than managing old projects.

[JeotQ]

If any trusted website we could build there new project will launch by low to high target of money. Suppose one project need low 1 million and high 5 millions USD against coin supply is 50 millions. Which funds will rise, all coin distribute among all investors. Price will depends on investment. Developing and promoting coin are separate.

I'm surprised a sir member created this post, I can't even understand a thing, all I can say is there are factors that determined the price of a token or coin, e.g max supply, lock strategies, but all the same it depends on how the team planned it

[bittraffic]

Since we can't get what OP is saying but the title of the thread I guess he's comparing which between ICO and IEO.

Teams will likely prefer the ICO for the money goes into their wallet while their funds will have some takeaways from exchanges who will conduct their IEO. When teams hold their funds, they can develop the product with freedom and they can partner up with organization thru the funds they have.

[Davian144]

I'm surprised a sir member created this post, I can't even understand a thing, all I can say is there are factors that determined the price of a token or coin, e.g max supply, lock strategies, but all the same it depends on how the team planned it

Do not be surprised when we know better than others, because intelligence in each human being is different, so when things go wrong, we must help to straighten or give a good understanding of that person, not a problem in Sr.member or others.

[bluebit25]

If any trusted website we could build there new project will launch by low to high target of money. Suppose one project need low 1 million and high 5 millions USD against coin supply is 50 millions. Which funds will rise, all coin distribute among all investors. Price will depends on investment. Developing and promoting coin are separate.

We can't even understand what are you talking about. If you are talking about you can build your platform on the place that you have also raised the funds for your platform and IEO was also offering the same and you can see binance chain , you can also create your token there as an alternative chain. I prefer any new apps must be decentralized.

I also couldn't understand what he was saying, it seemed that his English was broken and he could not explain it clearly. And if he wants a project to be successful in this market, that project must first have a serious development team and many large investment partners.

[Lizzylove1]

I am confused about your English write-up. It seems you are trying to ask the best method for funding new project when they need soft and hardcap. If  the project has good private investors together with a good exchange for their IEO, this will be good instead of setting hardcap target and at the end are left disappointed at the realized fund.

[aemma]

If any trusted website we could build there new project will launch by low to high target of money. Suppose one project need low 1 million and high 5 millions USD against coin supply is 50 millions. Which funds will rise, all coin distribute among all investors. Price will depends on investment. Developing and promoting coin are separate.

I do not clearly understand your point, but I will answer with respect to your title. As of today, raising funds for new startup is best done through IEO and not ICO. ICO paved way for various bad activities such as no listing even after successful ICO, exit scam etc; therefore owing to these, ICOs gradually ceased to exist as investors got tired and wise. But with IEO, it is a different thing as it is a bit safer and listing after successful sale is assured.

[cytpoway121]

If any trusted website we could build there new project will launch by low to high target of money. Suppose one project need low 1 million and high 5 millions USD against coin supply is 50 millions. Which funds will rise, all coin distribute among all investors. Price will depends on investment. Developing and promoting coin are separate.

I do not understand your question, but it looks like referencing the amounts project devs need to develop a project and the ratio against the token supply,
The reason why most ieo/icos fails is because they want to raise exhorbitant unnecessary fees, which investors would deem too much for such project.

And developing and promoting a coin has to be in the same bracket, because a good product without promotion wont attract investors.

[mahilchii]

I guess he's asking about the difference between ICO and IEO, correct me if I'm wrong.

The only difference is a coin or a public token is offered in a public ICO it's like anyone can participate. But in IEO only the concern members of the given exchange are able to purchase the token. Investment is still depends on the individuals.

[Jating]

If any trusted website we could build there new project will launch by low to high target of money. Suppose one project need low 1 million and high 5 millions USD against coin supply is 50 millions. Which funds will rise, all coin distribute among all investors. Price will depends on investment. Developing and promoting coin are separate.

I'm sorry but I can't understand what you're trying to say here.

Anyways, all things equal, it is still base on the project itself. If they have real life usage, regardless on how many coin supply they have, investors are going to flock and pour their money. We all know that investors are getting smarter, they won't simply invest on something that really looks shitty in the first place and would likely to exit scam, just saying.

[thisnewcoin]

Your idea is not different from ICO and IEO! How can you build a trusted platform? If Binance CEO, Huobi CEO, Okex CEO together make a platform for the fundraise then people will trust that and invest in it. Otherwise, no one will believe in a new platform that runs by some random people! Rather I would say IEO idea is better than yours!

[pacman7331]

I understand your thoughts but confused that why we need another platform that will raise funds for every new project. Everyone seeks profit, so, every reputed exchange has a different formula about fundraising for a new project, you can't make them together! If you want to build a platform according to your wish, you need huge supports from every big head from the crypto industry, regulations, known and famous partners! It is not easy and I think it is not possible! However, I respect your opinion.

[KimmyF]

Although initial price is fixed in ICO, IEO or STO. By your post I just understand that price isn't fixed in your platform. Suppose for 100 USD invest, I could get 100 coin or 1000 coin, coin price will follow total investment of project. I like this process because project will have enough liquidity pool. But problem is what is the future of this project to development., If coin supply is limit.

Thanks to understand my point and process. I'm also happy that you were trying to find problem in this find rise process. To development in future same process will apply. New coin amount and amount of funds need. My point is what is about process?

[Denongels]

for ico it seems that it is not because the project's heyday has ended, this is because in the last few times many ico have ended up being dead projects and also scams and it seems that when compared to ieo I is superior nowadays and ieo is still often done by major exchanges like binance, kucoin, okex and others because ieo still seems to be a fast means of collecting funds.