The success of a project is not the responsibility of bounty hunters alone

[Denreal]

I have come across some people who said/say, "Bounty hunters have nothing to contribute to our projects."
                                                                                                 OR
                                                              "We did not see the impact of bounty hunters on our project, therefore we are not paying them or better still we will reduce their reward."
                                                                                                 OR
                                                              " There are no investors on this forum."

These are all flimsy excuses given by the team whose projects failed.
They forgot to ask themselves if their projects are truly presentable or if their project has what it takes to convince the interests of potential investors.

The duty of a bounty hunter is not to get money out of the pocket of an investor to invest in a project, rather, it is to just create awareness about the project. E.g, by wearing the signature and avatar of the project on the forum. This will only call the attention of the investor. It is now left for such a project to showcase the stuff it is made of. If it contains nothing meaningful, I am sorry, it might not succeed, no matter how much awareness or marketing is done. Only very few projects scale through this without good substance, which is now very rare.

Gone are the days that investors invest blindly. They now take their time to study and analyze the project before giving out their money.
If you notice, people come on the telegram groups of projects to ask questions and if they are not satisfied, they leave.

Therefore, bounty hunters should not be blamed if a project fails, rather, the developers should go back to the drawing board and correct whatever needs to be corrected. Better still, they should ensure that they have done what is needed to be done, before coming to present what they have for the crypto community.

[Python Master]

I have come across some people who said/say, "Bounty hunters have nothing to contribute to our projects."
                                                                                                 OR
                                                              "We did not see the impact of bounty hunters on our project, therefore we are not paying them or better still we will reduce their reward."
                                                                                                 OR
                                                              " There are no investors on this forum."
~

Lol If it's right so why they still run bounty campaign. When you meet some one say like that, just ask so why he still launches bounty campaign?

[Twinkledoe]

I have come across some people who said/say, "Bounty hunters have nothing to contribute to our projects."
                                                                                                 OR
                                                              "We did not see the impact of bounty hunters on our project, therefore we are not paying them or better still we will reduce their reward."
                                                                                                 OR
                                                              " There are no investors on this forum."
~

Lol If it's right so why they still run bounty campaign. When you meet some one say like that, just ask so why he still launches bounty campaign?

Also, I don't agree that there are no investors in this forum. I did invest in several projects before as advertised here in the forum. The project seems legit and everything is in proper place but ending up the value promised after listing didn't materialize, thus, not even worth selling in the market. So if I did invest before, more than possibly, there are a lot here that are more than capable of investing. But with the proliferation of crap and scam projects, very few investors are now looking into potential projects that they can put their money to.

[Vision2020s]

Therefore, bounty hunters should not be blamed if a project fails, rather, the developers should go back to the drawing board and correct whatever needs to be corrected. Better still, they should ensure that they have done what is needed to be done, before coming to present what they have for the crypto community.

Well there are many things that contribute to the downfall of a project and bounty hunters dumping their allocation on the market is one of those things especially when the projects doesn't have enough market buy orders to support the dumps coming from hunters. Hunters are mostly promoters and not Investors so they are responsible for the publicity of the project and when that can't be achievable, they have failed.

[fuer44]

indeed it needs to be proven, that the project can run effectively or not if without bounty hunter. I do not agree with people who say that bounty hunters are useless, or there are no investors in this forum or social media where bounty hunters promote projects. so, it needs to be proven whether the bounty can still run without the bounty hunter or not, so that there is no longer a stigma against the bounty hunter and all can run well for all parties.

[TheClownSong]

The success of a project certainly depends on the product produced. Bounty hunters help in selling tokens by spreading information about the project and I think the most responsible for the failure of a project is the developer team itself

[bgaf]

Its the developers fault if the project didnt succeed. What is the connection of the bounty hunter being responsible here? I guess they are the one responsible for a good marketing. There are chances that the strategy isnt good but it also depend on the manager that will handle it.

For example, the manager picking shitty poster or social emdia spammer, hence they are the one setting rules and regulation of the campaign. If the manager is good on setting up a campaign, then there will be no problem. Also would you pay for a shitty post? I dont think so, money is also involved so better yet get a good set of participants for the task.

[Byakuga]

The success of a project is not the responsibility of bounty hunters because hunters can only do their part, they can't forcefully drag investors to the project so that they can invest, after creating awareness successful it's all in the investors hand and if the project is already well developed it should attract investors

[Ken_terrance]

Bounty hunters will only promote a project, it's all on the team if the project fails to attract investors, investors nowadays are smart, they want something new to put their money on and now that new projects are just full of fake promises and copycats investors have lose trust on new projects

[Maturnuwun]

the success of a project certainly depends on how the developer and also the team behind the project. if the developer is honest and really serious or uses their own personal funds it is unlikely to be at high risk of loss. and the final part may depend on the marketing of the project product.

[Retainly_Collie]

I have come across some people who said/say, "Bounty hunters have nothing to contribute to our projects."
                                                                                                 OR
                                                              "We did not see the impact of bounty hunters on our project, therefore we are not paying them or better still we will reduce their reward."
                                                                                                 OR
                                                              " There are no investors on this forum."

These are all flimsy excuses given by the team whose projects failed.
They forgot to ask themselves if their projects are truly presentable or if their project has what it takes to convince the interests of potential investors.

The duty of a bounty hunter is not to get money out of the pocket of an investor to invest in a project, rather, it is to just create awareness about the project. E.g, by wearing the signature and avatar of the project on the forum. This will only call the attention of the investor. It is now left for such a project to showcase the stuff it is made of. If it contains nothing meaningful, I am sorry, it might not succeed, no matter how much awareness or marketing is done. Only very few projects scale through this without good substance, which is now very rare.

Gone are the days that investors invest blindly. They now take their time to study and analyze the project before giving out their money.
If you notice, people come on the telegram groups of projects to ask questions and if they are not satisfied, they leave.

Therefore, bounty hunters should not be blamed if a project fails, rather, the developers should go back to the drawing board and correct whatever needs to be corrected. Better still, they should ensure that they have done what is needed to be done, before coming to present what they have for the crypto community.

If they make such statements then I am sure they are scam projects and the ultimate reason is they don't want to pay bounty hunters. We need to have some rules for new projects, if they have determined to implement bounty then they have to be responsible for it. We work and receive money from them, not for free

[CaVO32]

The success of a project certainly depends on the product produced. Bounty hunters help in selling tokens by spreading information about the project and I think the most responsible for the failure of a project is the developer team itself

Bounty hunters only facilitate the exposure of the project to all types of social media. But they are not in any way be responsible about the fate of the project. It is the developer's team that is in charge on which direction they want to go. Even the allotment to bounty hunters is very small compared to what they have. So even blaming them for the price decline in the exchanges should not happen at all. If they have solid grounds, they can always rise and recover.

But definitely, the success of the project is owed to the dev team, not their bounty hunters. They are just icing on the cake. A successful project should have real use case and active users to be proud of.

[Pffrt]

The very first two statements are correct almost. Most of the times, bounty hunter can't make any influence. However, it's not true that this forum has no investor. The problem is most of the forum members who interested in start up projects have some good knowledge. Since all the projects are shit these days, investors from forum members are smart enough to detect and avoid them.

[Greatchu]

Many new projects are bad that's why they fail most times, as hard as everything seems in crypto space today few new projects are still successful right? This means that new developers must put in more effort for their project to be well acknowledge

[vermigerous]

In my point of view, there's no doubt that bounty hunters can contribute to become a project successful. Their work through social media influencing several people to read their articles and project whereabouts. I think it is the investors that has something negative thoughts on bounty hunters such that they put the blame on the bounty hunters whenever the token listed gets dump or decreases price.   

[Kvalentine]

It's wise for every bounty Hunter to do research on projects because many bounties are not worth promoting, some bounties are created by scammers and only very few are legit, this is why research is the most important tool for a bounty hunter

[Oasisman]

It's wise for every bounty Hunter to do research on projects because many bounties are not worth promoting, some bounties are created by scammers and only very few are legit, this is why research is the most important tool for a bounty hunter

But it doesn't seem like most of the bounty hunters are doing good research right? Since 2018 bounty campaign has become a rampant strategy to scam investors, and a lot of users who didn't do the " research" has been tagged by DT, because they are promoting a fraudulent project.
Even legitimate projects are still susceptible in failure and the tokens/coins may turn out to be a shit coin. Bounty hunting nowadays will depend on luck and of course thorough research.

[istiak2277]

IF they really think that Bounty hunter is responsible for project failure and there are no investors on this forum then why they are running their bounty campaign in this forum. I think its only a excuse not to pay bounty hunters. Bounty hunters will work as the team wants so the responsibility goes to the project marketing team. Their strategy was wrong.

[FairUser]

IF they really think that Bounty hunter is responsible for project failure and there are no investors on this forum then why they are running their bounty campaign in this forum. I think its only a excuse not to pay bounty hunters. Bounty hunters will work as the team wants so the responsibility goes to the project marketing team. Their strategy was wrong.

Agree with you, that's just an excuse so they don't need to pay bounty hunter. Their project is really bad if they act like that. They did not have the capacity to develop the project and attract investors, such projects should die as soon as possible and hope no one will invest in their project.

[Mighty_crypt]

Even legit projects fail easily this days, promoting projects nowadays is just a try and see scheme, there are chances of failure and success, only quality projects will prevail and quality projects comes once in a while