Coronavirus tests include the common cold. Typically 20% positive.

[franky1]

Your whole point dies right here. Nobody knows for sure if CV is present. Why not? Because they test on "chunks" of any virus found in the person's system... not on the whole virus.

These same "chunks" appear in many viruses. So, how do they know that any of them are Coronavirus, since they haven't tested for the whole Coronavirus? Yet they say it's CV.

They are assuming, or downright lying.

shows how little you know
i bet you think your a banana if they only tested 40%. and ud believe it.
you dont realise that its a combination method of not just one test. but multiple tests, scans and symptom diagnostics.

but you can paint your skin as yellow as you like and show a test that looks like it says your a banana.. but everyone will still diagnose you as an idiot

[BADecker]

Your whole point dies right here. Nobody knows for sure if CV is present. Why not? Because they test on "chunks" of any virus found in the person's system... not on the whole virus.

These same "chunks" appear in many viruses. So, how do they know that any of them are Coronavirus, since they haven't tested for the whole Coronavirus? Yet they say it's CV.

They are assuming, or downright lying.

shows how little you know
i bet you think your a banana if they only tested 40%. and ud believe it.
you dont realise that its a combination method of not just one test. but multiple tests, scans and symptom diagnostics.

but you can paint your skin as yellow as you like and show a test that looks like it says your a banana.. but everyone will still diagnose you as an idiot

Shows how little you know about the way Coronavirus testing is done at this stage.

[franky1]

Shows how little you know about the way Coronavirus testing is done at this stage.

your conspiracy is based on conspiracy scripts from january. theres been new tests since then

UK NHS patients are getting tested with these. thats the whole point of the delay by self isolating and why only having enough for patients and not enough for full population

go research and update yourself a bit

[BADecker]

Shows how little you know about the way Coronavirus testing is done at this stage.

your conspiracy is based on conspiracy scripts from january. theres been new tests since then

UK NHS patients are getting tested with these. thats the whole point of the delay by self isolating and why only having enough for patients and not enough for full population

go research and update yourself a bit

Even if my points are based on their conspiracy, the update is that an accurate test takes a long time and is expensive. That's why they are still using the old methods.

But that's only a little of it. Where did they get the methods? From the creator of CV. Who is the creator? Scientists in North Carolina... especially a DR. Shi Zhengli, at the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.

Why would they do this? Their excuse is to find out how to protect against a real problem like CV. Of course, it would never be used on people, right?

Regarding this post, these creators are the people who are handing down the ways to test for it. The average doctor has no clue how to do this on his own. It would take years for him to research a way to do this. But testing methods were known years ago.

More details here https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AJjaQJTBTGU.

[franky1]

The best way to figure out if it was true or not would be to find the amount of people with respiratory problems in 2020 who were diagnosed with coronavirus (the common cold).

If that number suddenly dropped to near zero since they started testing for COVID-19, then you have your answer. They are showing positive anyone who has any coronavirus, not just COVID-19.

I have not been able to track down that number for 2020 though, only the past data showing 20% of people with respiratory problems testing positive.

While at the same time, 13.5% of Americans with respiratory problems tested positive for COVID-19.

people with the common cold do not end up needing to be sedated and put onto ventilators like those with covid do

doctors know the difference between the common cold and covid. they actually do have separate symptomology and different pathogens and many other things.
but im guessing you believe no one is an expert unless they are investing into a seastead

[Mad7Scientist]

This is a very important topic for discussion. If it is true that the tests test positive for many different viruses, maybe that is why the government delayed allowing companies to produce the tests for a month.

I'm still looking in to it, but if the RT-PCR tests grow more DNA/RNA, doesn't that RNA still have to be analyzed to determine what kind of virus it is?

[tvbcof]

This is a very important topic for discussion. If it is true that the tests test positive for many different viruses, maybe that is why the government delayed allowing companies to produce the tests for a month.

I'm still looking in to it, but if the RT-PCR tests grow more DNA/RNA, doesn't that RNA still have to be analyzed to determine what kind of virus it is?

One would take it for granted that the RT-PCR tests were primered with sequences which were unique to SARS-cov-2.  I sure did.  Now I am reading from some doctors that all they detect is general coronavirus.  And even that is hit-n-miss...since, again, they are pushing the cycles way up to the no-go zone where nothing is very accurate.

Two things have struck me about this whole thing:

 - One is that some countries (esp, the U.S.) seemed to consistently do everything right...if the goal WAS to achieve a high infection rate, and

 - The testing methods have been a comedy of 'errors' (which look a lot more like sabotage frankly) from day one and remain so here well into the 2nd quarter.  This allowed what may well be literally nothing at all of any actual threat to become blown up in the mainstream media and world governments as the biggest plague in known history.

[franky1]

This is a very important topic for discussion. If it is true that the tests test positive for many different viruses, maybe that is why the government delayed allowing companies to produce the tests for a month.

I'm still looking in to it, but if the RT-PCR tests grow more DNA/RNA, doesn't that RNA still have to be analyzed to determine what kind of virus it is?

One would take it for granted that the RT-PCR tests were primered with sequences which were unique to SARS-cov-2.  I sure did.  Now I am reading from some doctors that all they detect is general coronavirus.  And even that is hit-n-miss...since, again, they are pushing the cycles way up to the no-go zone where nothing is very accurate.

even as far back as christmas. lab techs were actually doing proper analysis and actually verified that it was not just 'normal' / general corona virus

some labs have tried to ramp up speeds of testing more people faster. but this has taken time. yes mistakes were made. but they didnt just carry on using machines that made mistakes..
its why for instance in the UK once they found a nice accurate level. they then made many machines to multiply how many tests they can sample at once.

think about computing analogy CPU. once they get to the limit of speed per core then then multiply the cores. and then make servers of multiple boards . a super computer is not a single core processor being ran at super speed.

these 'mega labs' dont just have one machine running super fast..

..
in some developing countries. they did use outdated tech. but that was more because of a 'better than nothing' atleast they would know it was a virus and not bacterial/panic attac/asthma
however as the days/weeks pass it is show that even those developing countries are getting access to the accurate machines

also hopsitals keep samples of the patients even after release/decease so if there are any inconsistancies they can retest.

[tvbcof]

...

Jesus wanky1!  Children should be seen and not heard.  You obviously have no fucking clue what the adults are talking about here.

[Spendulus]

...

Jesus wanky1!  Children should be seen and not heard.  You obviously have no fucking clue what the adults are talking about here.

That's certainly an interesting observation, Jesus Wanky2!

[tvbcof]

...

Jesus wanky1!  Children should be seen and not heard.  You obviously have no fucking clue what the adults are talking about here.

That's certainly an interesting observation, Jesus Wanky2!

You two should go play a game of tiddlywinks for lunch money.  I'd bet on you in that particular contest.

[BADecker]

...

Jesus wanky1!  Children should be seen and not heard.  You obviously have no fucking clue what the adults are talking about here.

That's certainly an interesting observation, Jesus Wanky2!

You two should go play a game of tiddlywinks for lunch money.  I'd bet on you in that particular contest.

They could always test each other for Covid-19.     

[Smartvirus]

There are much to know as per the statistics, strains and chains of the Covid19 situation.

[BADecker]

Simone lost her job for this introduction. And the video was kicked off Youtube. Watch it here https://altcensored.com/watch?v=otRN0X6F81c.

https://altcensored.com/

[BADecker]

Your whole point dies right here. Nobody knows for sure if CV is present. Why not? Because they test on "chunks" of any virus found in the person's system... not on the whole virus.

These same "chunks" appear in many viruses. So, how do they know that any of them are Coronavirus, since they haven't tested for the whole Coronavirus? Yet they say it's CV.

They are assuming, or downright lying.

shows how little you know
i bet you think your a banana if they only tested 40%. and ud believe it.
you dont realise that its a combination method of not just one test. but multiple tests, scans and symptom diagnostics.

but you can paint your skin as yellow as you like and show a test that looks like it says your a banana.. but everyone will still diagnose you as an idiot

Btw, I bet you think you're a monkey because 97% of your DNA is the same as a monkey's.