VOD i want to know if you understand you seem to be supporting a scammer?

[bonesjonesreturns]

Vod i want to hear your opinion on the irrefutable  scamming of lauda among other behaviors of laudas that are high risk.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5231720.0

Read this thoroughly and investigate then i will discuss your recent attempt to null the vital red tag warnings placed on a scammers account.

We can later move to other behaviors of lauda who you seem to be protecting and supporting.

I will initially give you the benefit of ther doubt and opportunity to fully review the evidence of laudas scamming.

I have tried to give you the benefit of the doubt previously because you said you were not supporting scammers and your long history here that is to be respected to a certain point.   That appears to be possibly untrue.

I hope you will not seek to avoid this discussion and the implications of your actions for honest members that deserve to see a red score bear a confirmed scammers account.

Im sure you would not wish to deliberately place members in danger by supporting confirmed scammers.

Perhaps you were unaware?

Why the recent positive trust on laudas trust list?
I know it is difficult to " unfriend" this scammer

[NeuroticFish]

Couldn't you have sent him a PM about this instead of making another thread?

If you look in the trust feedback you'll see your answer: "Alt account created solely for defamation and attacks."
Funny, that feedback is written exactly by Lauda.

[bonesjonesreturns]

Couldn't you have sent him a PM about this instead of making another thread?

If you look in the trust feedback you'll see your answer: "Alt account created solely for defamation and attacks."
Funny, that feedback is written exactly by Lauda.

Are you claiming the evidence of undeniable scamming that is presented is false and defamatory?

It appears that you are attempting to shield scammers? Is that what you are doing neuroticfish?
Make sure to answer and present examples.  Failure to do so will warrant an investigative thread dedicated to you so that you can explain why you are promugating the lies of scammers to mislead the community.

It is proper and correct that those endangering the community like you appear to be attempting to do must be stopped. You can not have members attempting to cast doubt or punish members for presenting irrefutable evidence of scamming.
You have 48 hrs to bring the false and defamatory information to this thread that this account had been spreading

If you want to retract your statement then that would be the sensible option if you realize after investigation you have been mistaken.

[NeuroticFish]

You have 48 hrs

I have 48h to.. what? feed the troll?! LOL!
Welcome to my ignore list though.

[bonesjonesreturns]

You have 48 hrs

I have 48h to.. what? feed the troll?! LOL!
Welcome to my ignore list though.

They run away everytime. Like roaches when you put the light on them.

The terms were clear 48hrs to present the false and incorrect information that you are saying i have posted.  You know the trolling you keep implying i am guilty of?

Bring it here and present it?? Why running away?

See? These people are telling lies. There is no trolling.  

They just want to say that the irrefutable evidence of scamming by thier pals is trolling they can shield them.
Scammer sheilder and supporters like neuroticfish should be punished as scammers are punished.  They are no better.
They place honest members at risk by trying to discredit warnings and sheltering scammers from punishment.

Scumbags.