A drop in hashrate is never good news because this simply means less people mining, less secured network.
To an extent I agree, although there will be (eventually) a natural ceiling in the hashrate. But really, it's unlikely to reach such a point before a vast amount of cumulative hashing has taken place at progressively higher mining difficulties. Let's not forget that this provides an increase in security against chain-rewriting attacks (currently several hundred days of security
according to this graph), and the protection provided increases exponentially according to how much more work is performed in each new block.
People with cheap electricity continued to mine during the $4k prices in March, but people with more expensive power turned their miners off (mostly Western world) which puts the first group (mostly East, China, Russia) in power.
Sure, and it doesn't really matter. The bitcoin protocol doesn't care where the hashrate comes from, it only cares whether the hashrate is following the rules on the chain which has accumulated the most PoW. If that means that the cheapest electricity sources are used more when the hashrate drops, all that does is increase the incentive for more hashrate demand in those regions where
any lower costs are available (not just electricity, although that is the main cost in BTC mining).