Merit abuse from 7 newbies

[Apocollapse]

I'm just checked Hebrew local board and want to see the thread in Hebrew, and I saw there are merit abuse in this board. Here I will show it.

Merit abuse

User fosofo8047
User dgincr
User kpt8

Merit history from fosofo8047 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=merit;u=2784810

Merit summary for fosofo8047
Merit: 3

Sent in the last 120 days
March 24, 2020, 05:20:40 PM: 1 to dgincr for (Deleted/Off-limits/Ignored) https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5234820.msg54089205#msg54089205
Received in the last 120 days
March 24, 2020, 04:31:44 PM: 2 from kpt8 for (Deleted/Off-limits/Ignored) https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5234970.msg54088874#msg54088874
March 24, 2020, 04:28:47 PM: 1 from kpt8 for (Deleted/Off-limits/Ignored) https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5234970.msg54088874#msg54088874

dgincr post

Post 54089205 (by dgincr) (scraped on Tue Mar 24 18:18:55 CET 2020):

I am join on telegram chat! My nick dgnicr

Archived


fosofo8047 post

Post 54088874 (by fosofo8047) (scraped on Tue Mar 24 17:26:49 CET 2020):

Very good project!

Archived


User tulpe12
User CursedHeretic
User cjsummers82
User COBNETCKNN

Merit history from tulpe12 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=merit;u=924379

Merit summary for tulpe12
Merit: 5

Sent in the last 120 days
April 10, 2020, 10:39:39 AM: 1 to rdtkv2 for Re: ❓ Proton (XPR)❓ - worth a coin, what do you think? ⛏💎
April 03, 2020, 11:56:01 AM: 1 to CursedHeretic for f
Received in the last 120 days

The post of the f topic is below

Both tulpe12 and cjsummers82 give merit to this post

If you are willing to take risks, you can buy this coin and wait for its growth.

COBNETCKNN give merit to this post

AA

Summarize

User fosofo8047
User dgincr is post gap on: March 24, 2020, 05:38:50 PM and on: December 17, 2014, 08:29:28 PM
User kpt8 is last post on: December 10, 2019, 01:28:49 AM
User tulpe12 is last post on: July 04, 2019, 07:29:29 PM
User CursedHeretic is post gap on: July 17, 2018, 12:11:48 PM and on: April 03, 2020, 11:08:09 AM
User cjsummers82 is last post on: May 06, 2019, 02:57:25 PM
User COBNETCKNN is last post on: April 16, 2019, 03:02:34 PM

Seems they are alt account or trading merit. Does that's post really deserve merit? only write emoticon, spamming and low quality post.

[1714799953]

1714799953

[1714799953]

1714799953

[Apocollapse]

Really no one reply for 1 days 130 views?

I should know if this post is really deserve or not and abusing merit or not.

If yes why don't tag these account and if not why don't explain more about my report or what's really the abusing merit in this forum?

I hope somebody review this

[Harlot]

It looks like DT members might have loosen their belts when it comes to these kinds of situation. Where in the members you have posted they only have interacted with them at least once or twice which doesn't  really make them guilty of anything even if these newbie members only have received merits from one source it still doesn't make any it prove that they are abusing the merit system. DT members might have a different view with these regarding what kind of posts these members have been merited too but the sample size might still be to small for them to hand them down some negative feedback. 

[Apocollapse]

-snip-

In my opinion it's doesn't matter how many merit he send to other post, even if the post is only deserve get 1 merit but someone send him 10 merit. At least the post is have "value" and not duplicate from other user post. Sometime,  I usually saw someone send merit only appreciate the authors effort and time to write the thread. And also people give merit to meme. I can't blame and I don't complain about this case since merit is subjective, people can send his merit whatever he want (but must follow the rules).

But, how can AA and   deserve merit? No joke, not fun, and only spam

I hope you agree what I mean

[Harlot]

I hope you agree what I mean

I do agree with you that those posts doesn't deserve any merit at all but like I said them getting a negative feedback will depend if the DT members wil be agreeing on your side. But in my point of view the evidence is simply lacking that only one or two time he have merited the user cannot simply convince or deemed substantial for any DT member here. If they sent several merit transactions to the same user and have sent some back to them then this might be a more convincing situation. I know that you want them all to be tagged but my advise is wait for them to slip a little bit more and gather more evidence against them to make your case more convincing to DT members.