Esto parece la segunda parte del mundo financiero vs Libra y afines, solo que en lugar de llamarlos por su nombre directamente (no cita Libra en las 67 páginas del documento), los enmarcan bajo un paraguas común, con alcance mayor al abarcar todas las stablecoins.
En todo caso, aunque las recomendaciones se fijen en mayor grado en los stablecoins (-to-be), también cubre los criptoactivos "inestables" (licencia literaria mía, en contraposición a los "estables"):
These recommendations are motivated by GSCs predominantly intended for retail purposes that may pose financial stability risks, but could also apply to stablecoins or other crypto-assets that pose similar risks.
[/b]
https://www.fsb.org/wp-content/uploads/P140420-1.pdfPor ejemplo, en la siguiente cita:
In March 2019, the Committee published a newsletter on the risks associated with crypto-assets. The Committee noted that the continued growth of crypto-assets has the potential to raise financial stability concerns and increase risks faced by banks, and that many types of crypto-assets do not reliably provide the standard economic functions of money issued or backed by a government or public authority and are unsafe to rely on as a medium of exchange or store of value. The newsletter outlined a set of minimum supervisory expectations for banks that are authorised, and decide, to acquire crypto-assets and/or provide related services.
Nota: Creo que este tema se abrió ayer también:
Bancos centrales presionados para el BAN de las stablecoins - AdiOs Tether!
