i think its better to do this trickle up economics than trickle down.
Definitely. Money always ends up in the hands of the rich. Better to give it to the poor first and let it work its way through the economy, rather than giving it to the rich directly.
'Trickle down' is absurd and obscene. It did actually begin as a joke:
Humorist Will Rogers jokingly advised in a column in 1932:
This election was lost four and six years ago, not this year. They [Republicans] didn’t start thinking of the old common fellow till just as they started out on the election tour. The money was all appropriated for the top in the hopes that it would trickle down to the needy. Mr. Hoover was an engineer. He knew that water trickles down. Put it uphill and let it go and it will reach the driest little spot. But he didn’t know that money trickled up. Give it to the people at the bottom and the people at the top will have it before night, anyhow. But it will at least have passed through the poor fellow's hands. They saved the big banks, but the little ones went up the flue.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trickle-down_economics