Project use case is important for long term investment

[Greatdev]

Agreed but use case are of different levels, some are better than the others, many use case in crypto space are over hyped.

And again sometime projects have good use case but with bad team, how will you keep holding on to such coin? It's better to watch out for both use case and capability of team

[Festac]

I don't agree, team professions are more important than use case most times, if team are good enough they can drive any new project to new better heights, I remember refereum project, as weak as its use case looks like the team have been doing excellent job so far

[totoy4741]

The problem is that how people would easily fall into something enticing and they not making any second thought and put their money in for investments. They should put atleast a little effort to search and learn/educate what and how the project would bring innovations/changes in business sector they proposed to.

[hushpupppy]

The problem is that how people would easily fall into something enticing and they not making any second thought and put their money in for investments. They should put atleast a little effort to search and learn/educate what and how the project would bring innovations/changes in business sector they proposed to.

To be frank, one of the best way for a crypto token to thrive and sell easily are if it is enticing, attracting and easy to use.
The question we should ask before investing is that, is the use case reliable ? is it achievable ? is it realistic ?

[irsada]

sometimes that looks attractive from the outside may not necessarily have good abilities inside.
Likewise with crypto, there are many real use cases but you can't do anything on the market, so don't expect too much about it because the pope is the real ruler.

[coin-investor]

Because a project without use case, it's just crypto currency. Without demand for the token, it may never reach its true value.

Of course, it is after the initial hype the coin will lose its value in the market, the most important thing right now is sustainable, if you failed to sustain your coin, investors will see that and they will just dump your coin and move to the next project, more so if your project is just a copy-paste of a past projects and those already in the market.

[fuer44]

since long time ago or based on experience in the world of bounties, projects with real use cases will be projects that have a future. because, usually after the token is released then the token will become useless because there is no real use case, and investors or traders who have already made a profit will usually leave immediately. because on average they started with pre-sale.

[OrangeII]

for now, conducting research before investing is mandatory. however, if you don't do the research, it's the same as throwing away your money. make sure that the project is worth. however, to be more secure, we can immediately choose tokens that are already on the market.

[suryana]

The problem is that how people would easily fall into something enticing and they not making any second thought and put their money in for investments. They should put atleast a little effort to search and learn/educate what and how the project would bring innovations/changes in business sector they proposed to.

Very few investors are really thorough when choosing their Investment Project. In addition limited by their knowledge about Crypto project, they were also influenced by the lure of gifts or advertisements distributed by the Project Team. I personally see it is not good if we make a new project as a long-term investment.

[cytpoway121]

To be honest with you, you cannot count on every projects use case when you are doing your own research because in crypto currency things happen.
If you want case study, look towards the blockburn project, the spyce project , currently their product is struggling.

One thing you have to take note is that, the project use case you are confident about; can it happen ?

[Convery]

But this is the real problem, we thought that cwe can built everything on blockchain, but as you can see blockchain is applicable only for money  transfers and as a form of digital asset. 

[Teraboy]

But this is the real problem, we thought that cwe can built everything on blockchain, but as you can see blockchain is applicable only for money  transfers and as a form of digital asset. 

So many times a lot of reliable parties have already stated if the potential of blockchain still needs the more research and that means to apply blockchain in any product still an impossible thing to happen. There are few sectors that can use blockchain as its core system properly especially in the financial sector.

[riso2015]

But this is the real problem, we thought that cwe can built everything on blockchain, but as you can see blockchain is applicable only for money  transfers and as a form of digital asset. 

So many times a lot of reliable parties have already stated if the potential of blockchain still needs the more research and that means to apply blockchain in any product still an impossible thing to happen. There are few sectors that can use blockchain as its core system properly especially in the financial sector.

This is reasonable because I think Blockchain is still not enough old and is still young to be accepted by various countries, So to prove the sophistication of Blockchain still needs a lot of research or tangible products using the Blockchain system. Any project which able to prove their product using the Blockchain then I think it is a very feasible project for us, as long term investment.

[Lexurdania]

I have seen several investors complain of rekts and loss after participating in certain ieos or investment, the token refuses to pump or increase in value.

It is as a result of poor demand for the token, hence before investing outrightly for the longer term, research and find out if the token has a use case that can drive token demand.

Because a project without use case, it's just crypto currency. Without demand for the token, it may never reach its true value.

In my opinion, most of the tokens or coins on the market are pump and dump projects. Unlike the coins or tokens that have products because their growth takes time. Tokens that have a use case will usually be more resistant to price fluctuations

[casperBGD]

I have seen several investors complain of rekts and loss after participating in certain ieos or investment, the token refuses to pump or increase in value.

It is as a result of poor demand for the token, hence before investing outrightly for the longer term, research and find out if the token has a use case that can drive token demand.

Because a project without use case, it's just crypto currency. Without demand for the token, it may never reach its true value.

In my opinion, most of the tokens or coins on the market are pump and dump projects. Unlike the coins or tokens that have products because their growth takes time. Tokens that have a use case will usually be more resistant to price fluctuations

i do not think that tokens with use case are more prone to price fluctuations, it is a volatile market, but use case and viable product is only way to have sustainable project for the future, in all other cases projects will shut down eventually since there will be no revenue for the people inside the project to continue their work

[doctor877]

Many people don't know that a use cases to be realistically achievable is one of the criteria to consider if you are going long term on a project. For an otherwise project , what the project will see is short term investors that will Invest to sell off on exchange and move on. In this process many will be caught in because it won't list on good exchange and price won't be anyway close to ieo price. Let's do more research before taking huge risks .