Bounties explanation and the reasons why many project is failed

[bgaf]

It will be difficult to compare such things because there is no special percentage for bounties from 2017 until now, but that has changed since investors no longer trust new projects because they often fail and make them disappointed with failed investments, of course they will lose a lot of money.
So now investors are more careful in choosing new projects to invest in, right?

Yes thats correct. Investors probably learned their greatest lesson that there is no permanent in this world. They probably invest on some ICOs that they would not expect to ruin or wasted their money. Lets agree that msot of them got loss and bounty hunters are dont losing any money while them suffer a huge defeat.

Bounty is not as precise and reliable today compared to previous years. But dont give up on looking for those worthy campaign. Maybe if you been a hunter for a long time you can recognized already which to promote.

[1715085123]

1715085123

[1715085123]

1715085123

[Script3d]

New projects should continue developing their product even if they didn't reach the softcap. I believe developers that continue to make their product are more serious about their project and the project is more likely to succeed in the long run. It's not really the bounty hunters fault if the project fails to reach softcap their project might not be interesting or doesn't have real world use.

[mdzahed134]

I think this depends on the different projects, there are projects that achieve success thanks to the bounty hunter promotion. There are also many projects that achieve success because their products are very good and welcome people.
Bonus campaigns contribute somewhat to the success of a project, but that is only a very small part and it cannot be completely decided.

I think Bounty Hunter has a big impact if a project wants to promote project well-known to investors. The failure of a project is not due to Bounty Hunter factor but because the developer who is not focused on taking care project based on the roadmap. A good team also influences a Crypto project.

There are many projects that achieve success without the need for bounty hunters, they have their own way of promoting.
The bounty hunters have contributed to the success of the project but the most important thing is the quality of their products.

Correct since 2017 I've been seen many projects has big hits without conducted any promotion as like bounty campaign, but in the scenario definitely which projects made enough fundraising in privately. At this moment it’s much rare to find a project without bounty promotion. No matter what projects quality i think promotion is helps to acquire success.                      

[nreal]

Most bounty do not require interaction with the content, but that does not mean that the content does not work. They cause projects to rank higher on search engines.

[shadowduck]

Most bounty do not require interaction with the content, but that does not mean that the content does not work. They cause projects to rank higher on search engines.

content works perfectly as I think. many people do not like to read information about the project in some resources. they all prefer to watch YouTube in order to see what is being said and listen to another person. the most important thing is that people must create very high-quality content

[MikeyVeez]

I remember when soft caps standartly were around 10 million USD in 2017. Now projects have problem to raise hundreds of thousands dollars and moreover on reputable exchanges. 

[bitstalker]

I remember when soft caps standartly were around 10 million USD in 2017. Now projects have problem to raise hundreds of thousands dollars and moreover on reputable exchanges. 

true because at this time the crowfunding crypto project has been tainted, and yes to get a lot of funds they also have to sacrifice more, for example, do promotions other than bounties and also if they want to do it ieo never use a new launchpad because the chances of success are very small and this is evident from the case hackenai. they prefer oceanfx launchpad because at oceanfx vechain tokens (the blockchain used by hackenai) have large volumes there but unfortunately that doesn't affect sales.

[Kiefner]

It is also worth considering the fact that a lot of projects began to appear and many even good projects are simply lost against the background of all the others. This is another important reason why projects and bounty companies fail.

[ballerin and giroud]

New projects should continue developing their product even if they didn't reach the softcap. I believe developers that continue to make their product are more serious about their project and the project is more likely to succeed in the long run. It's not really the bounty hunters fault if the project fails to reach softcap their project might not be interesting or doesn't have real world use.

The investor have learned the situation of 2017 ago, spending money for the project that have no real use case are worst. The chance to get their money back is small so they have to give to hope their money back. At least that situation can be evaluated, they have to learn more about the project and find the ins and out behind the team of the project because this is the important part when choose a project. I really like the developer who still try to build the project although they have failed to convince the investor for the first way. At least it can be made as a plus value for them.

[gundala]

OP focuses on the purpose of the bounty which is used as a means to attract investors. Whereas many bounty hunters only use fake followers or friends, so they feel less effective because they are not on target. That can be a reasonable reason. But it also depends entirely on how good the project is.

This is where the role of the bounty manager team, providing choices and selection that is really strict to achieve the desired goals.

[Ifemini]

There are no reasons for failure except lack of proper preparation and lack of product.
Alot of people now find it very easy to blame Bounty hunters and its not funny.

How can you blame hunters as a reason why projects do not get investors?
This is the lowest point