Satoshi Nakamoto never used Bitcointalk - new claim by Craig Wright

[avikz]

The news recently surfaced in my inbox,

https://news.bitcoin.com/craig-wright-claims-satoshi-nakamoto-never-used-bitcointalk-to-communicate/

Don't know how to react! The court case seems to taking unexpected twists and turns!

[1715332406]

1715332406

[1715332406]

1715332406

[1715332406]

1715332406

[1715332406]

1715332406

[SeaBits]

The news recently surfaced in my inbox,

https://news.bitcoin.com/craig-wright-claims-satoshi-nakamoto-never-used-bitcointalk-to-communicate/

Don't know how to react! The court case seems to taking unexpected twists and turns!

"However, the coronavirus outbreak has given Wright some leeway, as the Florida court system is slow and not up to par right now."

Just allowing him to Stall, use your keys Craig!

[BrewMaster]

it is not new, the scammer made the new noise about a month ago (https://bitcoinist.com/satoshi-never-used-bitcointalk-craig-wright/) in the continuation of his desperate attempts to fool people into believing his identity fraud and he still continues providing us with fresh material to laugh at him.
obviously shitty sites such as bitcoin.com love bullshit like this which is why they are repeating it all over again.

[The Cryptovator]

I have read this article on Google trend today (I mean it was visible to me automatically since mostly search I am using about crypto). But as same always I ignored what faketoshi wrote. Whatever he have claimed till now everything become false. Most of us we know about satoshi post here and who have created this forum. So better just ignore what he said and  I believe most of us call him a scammer. We don't need to react, he will not able to ever prove himself as satoshi nakamoto.

[iRaMMuS34]

What if we all just stop giving this lunatic what he wants - attention? I don't know if it's right to stop calling him out on his bullshit though, but I feel like crypto enthusiasts are the main thing that still keeps him afloat somehow, in a weird way. Let him destruy himself on his own terms

[Shallow]

Someone who wants to remain relevant even when it is clear that all odds are against him, will keep looking for a way to do so; this is mostly done by spreading false information etc. Sadly enough, it looks like we are the ones giving him that needed attention, but if he can be ignored then the reality will dawn on him. In my own case, I hardly read anything about him because it is not worth it. So let him continue spreading his lies, it is just a matter of time for that relevance he always sought for will be taken away from him..

[omone1]

Whenever this man is dishing out fraudulent claims as this, it could be he wants to pump bitcoinsatoshi in other to appear to his community as been real. Wright loves controversy that is how he gains more fame.

[o_e_l_e_o]

Wait, so his argument is that when the new domain was registered back in 2011, the evil forum administrators had already foreseen the forking of BCH, the double forking of BSV, Wright becoming an identity thief, and decided to start editing his posts 7-8 years in advance? Foxpup, have you been lending out your time machine again?

Strange it took him 10 years to say something, especially since for a full year he claims someone else was posting under his pseudonym, releasing new builds, solving bugs, etc. Perhaps he realizes that it is blindingly obvious that the person who controlled the satoshi account had actual knowledge regarding coding which CSW is hilariously deficient in, so the only way out of that particular bind is to claim it was someone else?

It is a myth that all the posts on Bitcointalk (bitcointalk.org) from my account (Satoshi) are in fact mine

He's certainly right about that. Everyone knows neither the account nor the posts are his.

[bitmover]

lol never used bitcointalk. He is desperate! He will soon be able to prove mental illness and will be free of any charges.

I read this news you linked and followed another one:

https://news.bitcoin.com/craig-wright-lawsuit-adam-back-pays-thousands/
Craig Wright Pays More Legal Fees
Craig Wright has been forced by a number of courts to pay legal fees during the last 12 months. Last year, Wright filed a lawsuit against Roger Ver, but the UK judge striked the libel lawsuit down and made Wright pay all of Ver’s legal fees. In the Kleiman v. Wright lawsuit, Wright was ordered to pay $165,000 in attorney fees in an order that took place on March 17. Wright also allegedly had a libel lawsuit against Ethereum’s Vitalik Buterin, podcast host Peter McCormack, and an anonymous Twitter user named Hodlonaut.
...
At the time, software developer Jameson Lopp responded to Ayre’s tweet and said: “Craig has been pleading his case that he is Satoshi for four years but has lost every appeal. There is no judge in the world with the authority to reverse the decisions made by the Court of Public Opinion.”

This guy is completely crazy. He is fighting with Adam Black, Vitalik Buterin, Loop and others! He is in war against the entire ecosystem.

obviously shitty sites such as bitcoin.com love bullshit like this which is why they are repeating it all over again.

That;s the problem. And so many people are fooled by those domains, putting money in scam projects...

[Stedsm]

He seems to be smoking some marijuana and other strong weed while leaving for court and then spits out shit from his mouth. I mean, someone who doesn't even know who Satoshi is (while still trying to claim he is Satoshi), and now this. His claim cuts his old words that he is Satoshi (no he isn't, and he proved this himself now).  

One of the most bitter-tongued person's I've ever seen is this guy. I'm not getting any pleasure while criticizing him but he's become a clown of our crypto society and I love to watch him do new things every now and then.

[cizatext]

The conspiracy theory against santoshi Nakamoto from craig has been in place since, but the truth is craig will lost every law suit in no time from now just watch it.

[ChiBitCTy]

I read this recently too.  Just a bunch of typical nonsense from the great doctor Craig Wright.  Craig is no satoshi, and I honestly don't see how anyone still believes that he is.  He first off hasn't moved any coins from Satoshi's address...that's the easy step 1.  He also has not produced any documentation proving that he opened several websites ( including this one ) with firms who keep your identity safe.  All he has to do is provide that paperwork. He's really not worth wasting time over any more.  Not as fun as it used to be making fun of him.

[pixie85]

He's such a moron.

Satoshi never used Bitcointalk but "My final post, in fact, links to a domain that does not exist." So that's suddenly "my" post? I thought You did not use Bitcointalk Craig

And of course published by bitcoin.com the most trusted crypto media site in the Internet

[MicroGuy]

The news recently surfaced in my inbox,

https://news.bitcoin.com/craig-wright-claims-satoshi-nakamoto-never-used-bitcointalk-to-communicate/

Don't know how to react! The court case seems to taking unexpected twists and turns!

This is in fact true. There were (are) multiple people using the login to bitcointalk.org.

Satoshi Nakamoto was a group and at least three people from the group held the BTC login.

[odolvlobo]

As for the satoshi never using Bitcointalk, that is misleading. The forum is the same, but the hosting, name, ownership, and URL all changed a couple times early on. When satoshi was posting, it wasn't called Bitcointalk and it wasn't at bitcointalk.org.

There were (are) multiple people using the login to bitcointalk.org.

Your story is showing some cracks. Bitcointalk.org didn't exist until several months after satoshi's last login.

Last Active:    December 13, 2010, 04:45:41 PM

Creation Date: 2011-06-24T05:19:00Z

[meanwords]

Wait a minute, didn't he already said this a few weeks back? https://bitcoinist.com/satoshi-never-used-bitcointalk-craig-wright/ or is this another new statement?

There's also a thread made by someone here addressing something similar to that https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5237483.msg54146724#msg54146724.

Definitely a delusional. How can he claim he is the real satoshi when in fact he didn't do any contribution to the project? all he does is shill scams all over the place. He can't even spell "Bitcoin". Even the real Satoshi would be laughing right now in his own island because of this fool. During the dark age of Bitcoin, where is he? now he is claiming that Satoshi didn't used Bitcointalk? I don't know what this guy is smoking but it must be a very powerful one.

Proofs all over the place.

[Little Mouse]

According to him, the account satoshi is created by someone else other than bitcoin inventor (Craig Wright as per him). He seems to be a trash now to me. I can not believe anyone else would have planned such trap back then because no one speculuted bitcoin would be such popular after few years.

[nomenclatur]

Craig Wright made a sensation he only admitted as satoshi Nakamoto was the claim made nonsense without clear evidence of something ridiculous Craig Wright could prove in court that he was a satoshi Nakamoto  unlikely he just made up a story to make him well known to the residents in the community of crypto cryptocurrency world.

[pooya87]

What if we all just stop giving this lunatic what he wants - attention? I don't know if it's right to stop calling him out on his bullshit though, but I feel like crypto enthusiasts are the main thing that still keeps him afloat somehow, in a weird way. Let him destruy himself on his own terms

that is the only way we can successfully defeat Craig Scammer Wright. but the biggest problem is the bold part in your comment. a lot of us can start ignoring him but it will never be "all" specially it won't be the media. we will continue seeing the news sites like this one here publish his nonsense and effectively give them the attention he seeks.
then another problem would be newcomers who don't yet know he is a scammer and would fall for it since the rest are ignoring him and don't debunk his lies.

[adeandro]

There is already evidence to the contrary, why talk about it?