Top reporters!

[Chikito]

Only table of counts, Let it be the name of the reporter not visible/Anonymous.

by the way, sometimes I have good status but the posts aren't deleted and still standing in?.

[Timelord2067]

Looks like the mods just ran out of time the other days:

You have reported 222 posts with 92% accuracy (184 good, 16 bad, 22 unhandled). When a post is deleted, reports for it will sometimes stay in unhandled status for some time before moving to handled status. Do not worry about your accuracy too much; one accurate report is worth many inaccurate reports.

It'll be interesting to read what some of the "soft-bad" posts are. 

[Bitlover10]

My report history. 728 posts reported with 100% accuracy. Why my name is not in the top 50 reporters list?

[gentlemand]

What a teacher's pet.

I think my accuracy is about 98 or 99 per cent.

I only report risible dross so would like to know where the virtues of that 2 per cent were hidden.

[actmyname]

I think my accuracy is about 98 or 99 per cent.

I only report risible dross so would like to know where the virtues of that 2 per cent were hidden.

Up to 3% you could be erring, due to the ceil function of the accuracy rating.

I want to say that most "bad" reports are due to duplicates, unhandled ones (surrounding spam) are in relevance to "sort-of on-topic" posts, which merely pass or rest on the edge of substance.

My report history. 728 posts reported with 100% accuracy. Why my name is not in the top 50 reporters list?

The quote was from 2016. And even with new data, you're just outside of the top 50:

Counts of members with good reports in the last year:

750-1000: 12
1000-1500: 15
1500-2000: 7
2000-3000: 5
3000-5000: 5
>5000: 8

[snipie]

My report history. 728 posts reported with 100% accuracy. Why my name is not in the top 50 reporters list?

https://i.imgur.com/3e6YWqC.jpg

The list in my first post, which contains the names, was quoted from theymos post ~4 years ago, ~3 years before your registration  
Iasenko has quoted a newer list, without names, posted ~1 year ago, which I found sufficient but not interesting.
BTW I don't see why someone would like to hide his name for something that should be proud of it but personally I respect his wish.

Edit: actmyname 

[suchmoon]

I only report risible dross so would like to know where the virtues of that 2 per cent were hidden.

Sounds like you didn't sacrifice the goat during the second full moon of February. You can't get to 100% by making rookie mistakes like that.

[wwzsocki]

My report history. 728 posts reported with 100% accuracy. Why my name is not in the top 50 reporters list?

You have to read the opening post one more time to understand why you are not on the list  .  

The purpose of this thread is to update the top reporter list because it has not been done from 2019.

I would like to use this opportunity to share my snitch statistics also  

[Lafu]

I would like to use this opportunity to share my snitch statistics also  

Feel free to post this in this thread here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5058163.0
I would be welcome more Users to post in this thread and share there reports.
No need for hide or be shy to post there.

[InvoKing]

I believe most of my reports were in the press sub. Nowadays there is less spammers and necro bumpers to bust, doesn't worth the effort to maintain an eye there as i used to do

Code:

You have reported 1257 posts with 99% accuracy (1223 good, 14 bad, 20 unhandled). Do not worry about your accuracy too much; one accurate report is worth many inaccurate reports.

I was one of the top 40 apparently until 2019, not bad!

[Welsh]

Reports may be left unhandled recently due to events happening in real life with current events. I know I've been somewhat inactive handling reports (I have a 100+ backlog right now), and other moderators have stepped in, but I'm assuming several other staff users are in similar situations, and have reduced activity on the forum as a result. However, we will get onto them eventually. Reports don't seem to disappear if left for a couple of days, and therefore a unhandled report may be handled several days after the fact. Also, unhandled reports doesn't mean it hasn't been seen that just may be the most appropriate action to take on it.

As for the reporting statistics, it would be nice to see an updated list. I know I've had my ass handed to me in the reporting statistics now, and I estimate there's at least 3 other users with 50k, and above. For the very little I do report these days, they are usually handled within an hour or so.

[snipie]

Good, bad, unhandled and somehow "classified" (no action taken which is usually the case), of course adding such thing will just put more unnecessary pressure on staff. Just said something come to my mind and realised its consequences while writing!

[Timelord2067]

Good, bad, unhandled and somehow "classified" (no action taken which is usually the case), of course adding such thing will just put more unnecessary pressure on staff. Just said something come to my mind and realised its consequences while writing!

That could explain why mods are suddenly marking everything "bad" Vs a week ago the exact same style posts were being marked "good" 

[snipie]

Ok seriously reporting? and deleting a "bump" posted once in this topic, few days ago, without posting any other bump after it!
Do i miss something here? Did i broke any rule to get my "bump" post deleted?
BTW I didn't consider bumping this topic anymore after i posted my bump several days ago since I am pretty sure theymos is aware of it. However this post bumped it, unfortunately, so report this post maybe too? Thanks.

Edit

Ok seriously reporting? and deleting a "bump" posted once in this topic, few days ago, without posting any other bump after it!
Do i miss something here? Did i broke any rule to get my "bump" post deleted?

maybe your "bump" has response, then it's not necessary still standing. this my assume and I don't report.

¡¿?!
AFAIK It is only theymos or maybe Cyrus who could provide such data, if he/they want to update it.

[blue Snow]

Ok seriously reporting? and deleting a "bump" posted once in this topic, few days ago, without posting any other bump after it!
Do i miss something here? Did i broke any rule to get my "bump" post deleted?

maybe your "bump" has response, then it's not necessary still standing. this my assume and I don't report.

[shorena]

Hi theymos, can you update the top reporters table, it was long time since you did so tho.
I know this will not be considered probably but maybe top reporters by section too?
-snip-

Yeah, would be nice to finally get kicked of the #1 spot officially