Is IEO not becoming to be worst than ICO, any future for bounty hunters?

[GreenStox]

why do you say that ieo is worse than ico, from 2019 beginning until now IEO has become a project trend for fundraising.
whereas ico has decreased interest.
maybe in the next year there will be a new method for fundraising.

[jrrsparkles]

HYIP for IEO is already over so new projects from the exchanges may not have enough community support, they will only get short term investors which is the reason why tokens and coins are getting dumped when it listed on exchanges.So as a bounty hunter they can't do anything other than stop involving in the bounty promotion projects.

[kingzpro]

Well honestly i know most the community is disappointed at how icos and even ieos have performed in last few months and bounty campaigns have proven to be worst but i will suggest to not lose hope and keep working because i am expecting market to improve as soon as we are in a bull run. Lets wait for new ATHs for bitcoin and ethereum and then we will see all good new projects will also moon.

[Drai]

This is why I hate the Probit exchange and I ignored the Sheng Global bounty campaign! Because Sheng Global IEO was in Probit and there was a 60% bonus! So, it's your choice, man! Those guys always will try to manipulate the crypto investors and bounty hunters, but if you are aware enough what you doing, then you won't fall in their trap! If they launch a bounty campaign, you will have option to join in another bounty campaign and that's the smart people does!

[qazgroup]

I am sure bounties will be back do not loose hope, if you work then you deserve the reward just believe in this and you may end up receiving huge reward or a campaign that you have done and reward token received that may surge 100 to 1000x in next bull run making up for all your losses and time wastage from scam and failed campaigns so stay positive.

[Bitstar_coin]

I o not think ICOs will become better than IEOs, because IEOs solves a crucial part of fundraising that bothers on incessant scams by the project developers, they collect the funds under zero supervision and make do with it the way they please. This was how trust started leaving the industry until IEO came calling

[el kaka22]

I think the whole point of non-profit of these type of IEO is the fact that you are helping someone, even if the price falls it doesn't mean anything, you shouldn't expect to make money, you are just helping a situation. Also there are so many IEO right now that not really all of them makes sense anymore, I mean I could start an IEO right now and definitely will find a place to list as well. There is no way all the IEO's could make a profit for you, some of them will be worthless and you will lose money from it.

It made sense when it was rare and when only the really good ones got listed, nowadays it became like ICO where anyone can do it. And exchanges realized that they could list as much as they can and make more money so they are not picky anymore.

[gaston castano]

The IEO will be no worse than the ICO because the IE ensures that the token or project is listed in its market, so it is an advantage in this market condition.
whereas the ICO will be less desirable because the IEO is more promising.
anything that comes out later should be better than the current IEO system.

[Divinespark]

The IEO will be no worse than the ICO because the IE ensures that the token or project is listed in its market, so it is an advantage in this market condition.
whereas the ICO will be less desirable because the IEO is more promising.
anything that comes out later should be better than the current IEO system.

But after being listed, the price dropped many times compared to IEO price, so it's no different from ICO. If you join IEO at large exchanges, the token collapse rate will decrease and you will have a better chance of getting profits.

[Greatdev]

Bounty season will still return but no one knows when, that's why it's not always good to give up, scam projects are many than good projects for sure but it doesn't make sense to give up

[CaVO32]

The IEO will be no worse than the ICO because the IE ensures that the token or project is listed in its market, so it is an advantage in this market condition.
whereas the ICO will be less desirable because the IEO is more promising.
anything that comes out later should be better than the current IEO system.

But after being listed, the price dropped many times compared to IEO price, so it's no different from ICO. If you join IEO at large exchanges, the token collapse rate will decrease and you will have a better chance of getting profits.

this is the reason why IEO is fading its popularity among crypto users except for some big projects in top exchanges. the fate is still the same, decline of price after few weeks or months in trading. the only assurance that it gives to investors is the listing right after the IEO stage. for those bounty hunters, you should prepare yourself that you will not receive your allotment based on the specified period of distribution. they are always late up until the value is not good anymore. sometimes if you will see a promising project, better buy it after being traded for few weeks, because the chance that the price is much cheaper than IEO price is very high.

[luckyflop]

Bounty season will still return but no one knows when, that's why it's not always good to give up, scam projects are many than good projects for sure but it doesn't make sense to give up

Bounty will only be good if the altcoin season returns like 2017, where many new projects were created and received investors' attention. But due to the aftermath of having too many scam projects, bounty collapsed like ICOs collapsed. And I think it's too hard for the past to happen again

[masterrex]

Your OP has two questions that need to be answered, first question "Is IEO not becoming to be worst than ICO" I think it's not! because IEO is more secure compare to an ICO since the transaction was done inside the crypto-exchange that acts like escrow service. While in ICO the funding transaction was directly sent to the founder's position and without any third party Audit, it is prone to corruption that later on becomes an exit scam. The second question "Any future for bounty hunters?" I think bounty campaigns are here to stay because it is the cheapest form of marketing and advertising strategy. where on earth you can find any advertising agency that accepts a native token without value as a form of payment? all of it was only exists in the forums and other bounty and marketing platforms etc. But we must admit that the budget or allocation in the most bounties nowadays are sinking and also we must face the new normal in our payments scheme because bounty tokens are locked in different periods but depend on the project. ranging from 2-,6 months up to a year.

[poodle63]

STO not really that interesting, there is reason why IEO could succeed when it first got introduced you know  which is certainty that the token will be listed to that exchange and to be frank there are many STO out there already and they perform just like ICO or IEO. I'm not putting too much hope to STO.

[erep]

Those who blame bounty hunters for the dumping and prize crash - they probably don't know much about bounties. Usually 3% - 5% of total coin supply is distributed to bounty hunters. If dumping of that minuscule amount of tokens drags down the price of the token and never comes back to track, then you have to understand that this is the fate of the token.

Just one pro tip- don't invest in any IEOs for a long term. Just invest and get out as soon as the trading commences. You will usually see profit.

Usually the 70% allocation is for investors, but the bounty only gets the smallest distribution of 1% -5% of the total of all token allocations, if the bounty allocation dumps on the market will not have any effect if the real trading volume, but will affect when the team manipulates the token sale with reached very high and usually low-volume demand.

[SanZoldyck]

not all losses are caused by the Bounty hunter, when the project enters exchange there are certain losses and benefits, but there are times when the Bounty hunter has not been paid but the price on the project entering the Exchange is down 50% from the price of IEO and ICO Is this the Bounty hunter's fault? Of course not, it was the fault of their project that didn't want to buy back the tokens to raise prices again

[Gotumoot]

As i understand Bounty is kind of marketing, if there have no IEO or ICO, projects still can do Bounty for their project publicity. So, Bounty will alive till project owners findout another easy or low cost way to publicity their product and project.

But bounty is the only low fee publicity that they could have in just a low investment they would have so many people who would promote their project in so many ways like social media , Youtube and even here on the forum where there are so many crypto enthusiast.
So what more they could wish for? it is only a low investment for a huge publicity unless they really want to invest big time for their projects publicity then they wouldn't go out for bounty and would go directly for other types of marketing strategy.

[Gheka]

The IEO will be no worse than the ICO because the IE ensures that the token or project is listed in its market, so it is an advantage in this market condition.
whereas the ICO will be less desirable because the IEO is more promising.
anything that comes out later should be better than the current IEO system.

But after being listed, the price dropped many times compared to IEO price, so it's no different from ICO. If you join IEO at large exchanges, the token collapse rate will decrease and you will have a better chance of getting profits.

The result is obviously as you say, IEO is just following the initial stages of the ICO, reaping a lot of success with the first projects but this ratio will start to decline with a not so good market condition, combined with people's needs and many other factors but the most fortunate thing is that we won't lose all our assets for a bad IEO project, it's just a part of the assets. The future of the hunter may only change with the trends of the projects, if the project offers good methods in the future, bounty hunters will receive corresponding benefits and vice versa

[ije07]

as I said before that IEO is just a project trend and not much different from ICO. it's just that some developers do IEO as a new strategy to attract ICO investors. but to be honest, I personally don't like the IEO listed on shady exchanges, they always manipulate the volume of coins or prices to attract investors.

[Chuky92]

Truthfully, the way I see it, there is no much difference between ICO and IEO because a team working for themselves alone will always show up; its just that IEO gives that assurance that once the sale is over trading starts which isn't seen in ICO. Also, for IEO, one can easily invest in whichever project he finds worthy although that is not always the case after the trading starts.
Now for projects having 100% bonuses shows how desperate they are to attract investors, that's how I see it and which is why many of them, the price doesn't stand for long. Bounty will always be needed but yet there is need to be careful of every bounty from most projects, a project with 100% bonus, who knows the value the token will be at when the bounty hunters receives it, yet when they sell, they will still be blamed even though the reward is now less due to low price.