🔥 [Defamation] At Its Worst During ChipMixer Applications 🔥

[Vispilio]

I don't think DarkStar_ is influenced by anything except his own judgement, nor do I think he is (or is going to start) discriminating against any particular group of members, like the Turkish community.  There are some very vocal and belligerent members in that community, but they don't represent the whole Turkish section by any means.  And Jesus, DarkStar_ has rejected applicants with near-perfect English who consistently make constructive posts and who'd usually be snapped up by another sig campaign in a heartbeat.  He's got high standards, but it doesn't necessarily follow that he's rejecting certain members because of prejudice.

However, Darkstar_ can make a gesture by taking at least one Turkish member.

Why should there even be one "token" member?  I think DarkStar_ ought to continue to accept only the best posters (and the most reputable ones) and not give in to this absurd nationalistic crusade you've been promulgating.

This thread has absolute 0 to do with "discrimination against Turks", "nationalist zeal" or any other such bullshit that you keep bringing to threads of this nature in an all too familiar attempt to derail it yet again to mask your friends' heinous activities.

@wolwoo, please don't play into the hands of the mafia by giving them a chance to divert from mathematically proven corruption in Signature campaign selections.

I'll spell it out for you Pharmacist just once so you don't have to regurgitate the same straw man fallacy for the thousandth time:

There is a DT clique, which you seem to be oblivious to, acting in coordinated attacks to insure that a certain group of members keep artificially clean Trust sheets, so they get all the top positions in BTC signature bounties in this forum, while they also conspire with fake character assassination jobs, using useful idiots (and many alt accounts to upvote them) like ~jollygood and ~lauda to defame otherwise sound and better qualified members, who then keep getting rejected from these campaigns based on the false grounds they created.

Thus an army of mediocrity milks this forum for salaries in the form of "signature campaigns", while most of the much better qualified, meritocratic and innocent members have gotten alienated and abandoned the forum, disillusioned by the hypocrisy and feigned ignorance exhibited by members such as you and LoyceV, who seem to spend every day on Meta and Reputation boards, but mysteriously can't bring yourselves to state the blatantly obvious and take the side of truth and justice even one time...

Why should @theymos and @Darkstar_ get involved ? To save this forum from drowning in the cesspools of nepotism, hypocrisy and double standards, which have become the order of the day in Default Trust and Signature Campaign activities thanks to complicit members like you...

[1714812638]

1714812638

[1714812638]

1714812638

[1714812638]

1714812638

[bonesjonesreturns]

I don't expect theymos to get involved, freedom of speech prevails. DarkStar_ is more than capable to decide on his own, and ChipMixer clearly trusts him.

No, I'd be really surprised if Theymos stepped in to mediate this issue and I'd bet money that he's not going to.

I don't think DarkStar_ is influenced by anything except his own judgement, nor do I think he is (or is going to start) discriminating against any particular group of members, like the Turkish community.  There are some very vocal and belligerent members in that community, but they don't represent the whole Turkish section by any means.  And Jesus, DarkStar_ has rejected applicants with near-perfect English who consistently make constructive posts and who'd usually be snapped up by another sig campaign in a heartbeat.  He's got high standards, but it doesn't necessarily follow that he's rejecting certain members because of prejudice.

However, Darkstar_ can make a gesture by taking at least one Turkish member.

Why should there even be one "token" member?  I think DarkStar_ ought to continue to accept only the best posters (and the most reputable ones) and not give in to this absurd nationalistic crusade you've been promulgating.

Yeah, Darkstar_ has such high standards for post quality that he selects Thepharmacist?
If thepharmacist could produce 5 of his best, original and thought provoking posts for analysis please?

This will be fun.

He's a full on retard. Been here years and in that time he has no achievement of any note at all.
He even admitted his biggest achievement here was getting on to chipmixer lol.

On top of this thepharmacist was busted for sneakily using a sock puppet account ( HugeBlackWoman) to slather racist trolling garbage all over the forum. He got caught because he was so greedy that even on his sock puppet racist account he was trying to jump from one sig to a slightly better paying sig.

So darkstar hires a racist sneaky greedy shitposter with zero achievements, who openly admits that he will support scammers like lauda out of loyalty even though he admits lauda may have done wrong.

Lol at darkstars exceedingly high standards.

Funny how darkstar hires nearly all of the gang like meta cult of shitposting scammer supporters. The ones that all send each other merit and all include each other on DT?

All these excuses they are bringing are not only bullshit. They are irrelevant. Darkstar does not control what lauda does to your account with trust abuse.  Lauda is clearly saying he will trust abuse members who apply or work with chipmixer

That is disgraceful.

These people making excuses for him with irrelevant crap are the usual gang...loycev , pharmacist etc etc
All happy wearing their chipmixer sigs are they not.

[Vispilio]

For future reference:

2 more pieces of evidence to how successful defamation activities can be in costing even selected participants thousands of dollars / month in earnings. ~lauda's and ~jollygood's behavior are the equivalent of financially scamming someone, their libel robs innocent people of most signature earnings, and these heinous individuals should belong in every sane user's black list;

in fact there is no other respectable website or organization that I know of where administrative staff would allow criminal scum like these to get whitewashed and protected by certain bad nepotist actors that have entrenched themselves in the community...  

ps. they will now create idle banter back and forth in the impostor thread to constantly keep it on top to continue trolling the forum with their black propaganda...

Considering that normally 1 / 10th of what they are doing would merit a ban on this forum, it's reasonable to assume someone or an organization with decisive authority on Bitcointalk is employing these useful trolls for their own dark agendas;

needless to say all this subtracts greatly from the integrity and prestige of Bitcointalk, and crypto space in general.

I was informed by a PM from the bounty manager of the project that I signed today. @Lauda left negative feedback on my profile.

The reason for this is that I support in a title opened by @ Vispilio. In the meantime, let me tell you briefly about @ Vispilio with a summary. He is someone who is the most reliable and commissioned merit source in the Turkish community because his ideas are given importance by the forum administrators. In other words, @Lauda has left my profile untrustworthy because I support not only an ordinary person but also someone who is appreciated by the forum administration!

If it was unsafe to say that someone could succeed in the forum, I'm sure we should have painted the vast majority of the forum in red. Moreover, I would bet that @ Lauda said it was his own gang. I don't care about Lauda's ideas either. I also know that there are enough people in the forum who do not like him. Because if anyone knows what other benefits Lauda has to the forum other than planting hate seeds, please tell us!

Another question is for our bounty manager who tells me to solve this problem in order not to disqualify me from the bounty I am in. How accurate is my disqualification from bounty as someone who doesn't even have DT1 or DT2 leaves negative feedback on my profile?

Finally, I have not acted in a "gang" in the forum until today! @Vispilio only reported that I support because it makes a difference with its information in the forum and has the capacity to accomplish the job. I don't regret this. I still think that he can do the job given to him. I would not hesitate to support them if they were candidates for such a job with other very valuable friends like him, who cannot count their name one by one!



BTW, I looked at all members of 777Coin signature profiles. 11 other members has a negative feedback in their profile also!

[wolwoo]

snip

they gossip on the other page

[TECSHARE]

I have said it before, I will say it again. These people don't keep you out of the default trust because they are racist or hate Turks (except maybe Lauda). They do it because you are a unified group outside of their control which would be a direct threat to their unilateral control of the trust system and cornering of the signature market via extortion, threats, and trust system manipulation.

[wolwoo]

I have said it before, I will say it again. These people don't keep you out of the default trust because they are racist or hate Turks (except maybe Lauda). They do it because you are a unified group outside of their control which would be a direct threat to their unilateral control of the trust system and cornering of the signature market via extortion, threats, and trust system manipulation.

Finally someone telling the truth, Bravo
the only problem is: we are not unity
but if these attacks continue we can eventually become united

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fr4OJ7po3T4&list=RDfzYS5Od0psM&index=30

This song is a gift to you (I haven't merit )

[nutildah]

I have said it before, I will say it again. These people don't keep you out of the default trust because they are racist or hate Turks (except maybe Lauda). They do it because you are a unified group outside of their control which would be a direct threat to their unilateral control of the trust system and cornering of the signature market via extortion, threats, and trust system manipulation.

Similar to how you don't support "these people" because you care about them, you support them because they support you. You include people who put someone like this on DT1

Add me to your trust list and I'll add you
Give me feedback and I'll give you

not because you care about them, but because they responded to your inclusion mutually. All you are doing is defending other trust system manipulators because you are one of them. Much like them, your desire to be on DT1 supersedes your willingness to act rationally.

Those with an understanding of the purpose of DT and who can look at the issue objectively realize that people who would endorse wolwoo don't belong on DT1. People whose desire to be on DT1 overrides their sense of responsibility look the other way. That is the camp you fall into, and what binds your allegiances.

[wolwoo]

I have said it before, I will say it again. These people don't keep you out of the default trust because they are racist or hate Turks (except maybe Lauda). They do it because you are a unified group outside of their control which would be a direct threat to their unilateral control of the trust system and cornering of the signature market via extortion, threats, and trust system manipulation.

Similar to how you don't support "these people" because you care about them, you support them because they support you. You include people who put someone like this on DT1

Add me to your trust list and I'll add you
Give me feedback and I'll give you

not because you care about them, but because they responded to your inclusion mutually. All you are doing is defending other trust system manipulators because you are one of them. Much like them, your desire to be on DT1 supersedes your willingness to act rationally.

Those with an understanding of the purpose of DT and who can look at the issue objectively realize that people who would endorse wolwoo don't belong on DT1. People whose desire to be on DT1 overrides their sense of responsibility look the other way. That is the camp you fall into, and what binds your allegiances.

actually that means
everybody does but i can't, so i wrote   I'm clumsy on these political issues

[nutildah]

actually that means
everybody does but i can't, so i wrote   I'm clumsy on these political issues

Well, for the record, I have nothing against you personally. I just don't think you should be on DT1.

[wolwoo]

actually that means
everybody does but i can't, so i wrote   I'm clumsy on these political issues

Well, for the record, I have nothing against you personally. I just don't think you should be on DT1.

I think you eat nutella too much, you got drunk

[TECSHARE]

Similar to how you don't support "these people" because you care about them, you support them because they support you. You include people who put someone like this on DT1

I support (some) of them because they are a counterbalancing force to the totally unaccountable iron grip you and your red nosed red assed buddies have over the trust system. I have seen reliable evidence presented against almost none of these people who are regularly and perpetually attacked because they threaten the existing unilateral control of the trust system.

[wolwoo]

Similar to how you don't support "these people" because you care about them, you support them because they support you. You include people who put someone like this on DT1

I support (some) of them because they are a counterbalancing force to the totally unaccountable iron grip you and your red nosed red assed buddies have over the trust system. I have seen reliable evidence presented against almost none of these people who are regularly and perpetually attacked because they threaten the existing unilateral control of the trust system.

YOU ARE THE MAN   (meaning disappeared when you translate but it is a good thing)

set up party, let's vote

[nutildah]

I support (some) of them because they are a counterbalancing force to the totally unaccountable iron grip you and your red nosed red assed buddies have over the trust system. I have seen reliable evidence presented against almost none of these people who are regularly and perpetually attacked because they threaten the existing unilateral control of the trust system.

Again -- terrible reasons to include somebody in your trust list, and indicative of your continued misunderstanding of the basic functions of DT.

[TECSHARE]

I support (some) of them because they are a counterbalancing force to the totally unaccountable iron grip you and your red nosed red assed buddies have over the trust system. I have seen reliable evidence presented against almost none of these people who are regularly and perpetually attacked because they threaten the existing unilateral control of the trust system.

Again -- terrible reasons to include somebody in your trust list, and indicative of your continued misunderstanding of the basic functions of DT.

Actually that is the whole point of the trust system. In spite of that, you feel that you have a right to not only choose who you think uses the system correctly by making your own trust list, but also dictate who I and others can include in our trust lists. The mere act of adding some one you don't agree with is "abuse". Also adding people who add people who you say are "abusive" is also "abuse". The only thing not "abuse" according to you is if we copy your inclusions and exclusions exactly.

[nutildah]

Actually that is kind of the whole point of the trust system.

No, its not, at all...

Trust lists

 - If you find someone who has sent accurate trust actions and has no inaccurate/inappropriate trust actions, add them to your trust list. Inclusion in trust lists is a more a mark of useful contributions than your trust in them, though at least a little trust is necessary.

You are not basing your inclusions on this criteria. You are basing them on

1. their willingness to include you, and
2. who has excluded them from their trust lists.

This kind of mindset has led to scammers, banned users and users who blatantly misuse the trust system being added to DT.

[wolwoo]

I answer you but I'm so tired
I woke up 20 hours ago
Bla bla Bla 

[suchmoon]

I have seen reliable evidence presented against almost none of these people

It's literally in the post you're replying to:

Add me to your trust list and I'll add you
Give me feedback and I'll give you

I'm quite impressed with the lengths you go to in order to deny reality.

[pugman]

I don't think you know what terrorism means...

[Blacknavy]

The main problem here is that some people initiate lies and defamation campaign against other members to join the Chipmixer/Fortunejack etc. which is high paid signature campaign. They created a gang within the forum, and some of the default trust members are not trusted. These people are harming BTT users who love Bitcoin and the Bitcoin ecosystem for their own benefit. Everyone knows very well what's going on here. They can give you a red trust to ruin your reputation by using their endless ALT account pool because $100-450 in a week enough to fuck this forum. It is not about race or personalities.. It’s about the sig-GANGS.

f-r-a-u-d-s-t-e-r-s.

[peloso]

The main problem here is that some people initiate lies and defamation campaign against other members to join the Chipmixer/Fortunejack etc. which is high paid signature campaign. They created a gang within the forum, and some of the default trust members are not trusted. These people are harming BTT users who love Bitcoin and the Bitcoin ecosystem for their own benefit. Everyone knows very well what's going on here. They can give you a red trust to ruin your reputation by using their endless ALT account pool because $100-450 in a week enough to fuck this forum. It is not about race or personalities.. It’s about the sig-GANGS.

f-r-a-u-d-s-t-e-r-s.

need a revolution for justice to triumph