Unmasking Satoshi Nakamoto - new attack on Theymos from Bcashers

[gmaxwell]

Knowing that the YouTuber was not-so-low-key advocating for big blocks throughout the video, it's likely that he simply just didn't know about Theymos' alleged real name.

Some of the "articles" the content was more or less directly copied from have contained it, I think it's more likely that they just wanted to avoid the easy vector for getting the video taken down.

[dkbit98]

It's odd that he would attack Theymos in this way and still respect him enough to use his alias instead of his real name.

He sure does like mystery and conspiracy theories.
I remember when we accused theymos in his own video about deleting his old post (that he posted in foreign section by mistake).
He later said he was sorry, but never used alleged Theymos real name.
More here:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5180012.0

[gentlemand]

It's obviously paid video with BCH vibe, and that is low even for MemoryDealers aka RV.

This will always be the ultimate Ver-funded creation - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mCllEvfvgUY

What better way to speak to today's youth than with an exciting Rock Song by a popular beat combo?

The man himself had a post in there telling people to concentrate on the lyrics which has mysteriously disappeared.

As for Adam Back he sounded distinctly unenthusiastic until 2013.

[kezinaur14]

They also claim this:

Bitcoin's creator satoshi Nakamoto has remained a mystery, until today. (spoiler: Adam Back)

They claim that Satoshi Nakamoto is Adam Back aka adam3us (Sr. Member in bitcointalk foru)

He claims he's not:
https://twitter.com/adam3us/status/1259979639092588551
And if you want something nice, here is   Calvin Ayre accusing Adam of being a scammer when he claims he is NOT Satoshi.  

Other than a few laughs when you're really bored, does somebody else care what shitcashers and shitvisionaries claim?

Does anyone actually care who Satoshi Nakamoto is? If we really get to know him, great, it doesn't change anything for Bitcoin, as he intended it to outgrow his reach, and that's exactly what has happened. Anyone claiming to be Satoshi is just power hungry and looking for a cult to follow them. It's not rocket science, it's actually very transparent once you think about it that way

[rdbase]

but main point of this topic is attacks on theymos,
and less regarding claims if Adam Back is Satoshi Nakamoto.
Also I can't prove that Barely Sociable channel has any real connections with cashers/visionaries or he just watched their propaganda videos.
152k people watched this video so far in one day

The title "Unmasking Satoshi Nakamoto" was just a clickbait then, it's the same title of Barely Sociable video. I don't really care if AB was SN let's just thank him for what he did. Well, it's not surprising the channel has 377k+ of subscribers.

If you see members on the forum involved in that, list their names and a simple tag and flag and its over can be executed.

Don't give them a hint, that will be another scope for Barely Sociable they might come up.

I dont either to be honest and just see it as entertainment at this point.
He was logged in during a dissection of his own video nor was allowed to speak during the livestream but was on the chat posting "Look at the screen!" as proof for what he was stating in his video on the subject and "LMAO" half of the time.

[coolcoinz]

Even if it isn't true some of this will look legit to an average youtuber (not a member of this forum).
I saw the video and my first thought was: "this guy spent a lot of time digging up dirt and throwing it at blockstream and theymos, some of it is gonna stick".
If you're smart you can se that it's a pile of accusations. He run a narration like it was an opening statement of a court case, so that in the end we'd all believe him and want to burn some people at a stake. I'd prefer it to be a research showing statements from both parties, but we can't have it all, right?

As for Adam Back he sounded distinctly unenthusiastic until 2013.

It's interesting he had that gap before the white paper came out. There's not enough evidence but that, c++ and his double spacing...

[fueleh]

He makes ALOT of good points and as usual pathethic ppl like jimmy song and tone vays who are payrolled by blockstream makes no points and say nothing besides BCASH BCASH 2hours straight as defense...

[BitcoinFX]

...snip...

They also claim this:

Bitcoin's creator satoshi Nakamoto has remained a mystery, until today. (spoiler: Adam Back)

They claim that Satoshi Nakamoto is Adam Back aka adam3us (Sr. Member in bitcointalk forum)

...snip...

If we forget all of the politics and the 'money' for a moment ...

The funniest part is if Adam is Satoshi (the Bcashers claim here) and Adam supports BTC and not the BCH fork ...

Remind me why anyone even needs BCH again?

HINT: It's a rhetorical question. We don't need BCH for anything, because its not Bitcoin. Bitcoin = BTC

 

[minusfive]

Roger Ver's systematic attacks against Bitcoin in great despair humiliates him and explains that the garbage called Bitcoin Cash is also a great shame. If the purpose of the creation of Bitcoin was understood by the community, even the smallest amount of money would not be invested in BCH/BSV aKa forks.