Do I need ICO?

[Farma]

ICO is indeed the best way to raise funds for something that you have developed. however, for now, it's better to choose IEO. it's just that, whichever you choose, it all has risks, and of course also requires a substantial cost. it is very difficult to find a way as Satoshi Nakamoto did. however, current developments have really advanced.

[hadisaw]

if you really need a lot of funds then you need to do ICO/IEO but if you can get your own investors to fund the project that you are developing now then there is no need to do ICO/IEO

Yes, but for now if the project developer wants more funds for the project, the choice is through IEO on a good exchange bro, not through ICO because investors now no longer trust ICO since there are many scammers in ICO in the last two years.

it's really sad when discussing ICO the last 2 years, many investors are very disappointed with ico and now it is quite difficult to build investor confidence but it's a matter of trying and rebuilding trust in ico

[Shallow]

I ’m a technician, but I do n’t know how to promote it.
I hope that like Satoshi Nakamoto, there is no ICO, no pre-mining, but no one will develop for free. All need money.
The isomorphic multi-chain solution was designed by myself. The core technology has been implemented and verified to be feasible.

I can complete the technical project by myself.
I have developed the first technical version and will finish the second technical version.
The next plan is an application, which requires a formal team and a lot of funding.
The project is online more than half a year, but the promotion is slow.

If your idea is good as you claimed then you need funding but you can't do it on your own, first you need a team who believes in you and have same vision like you, this will give your idea or project a good kick towards the right direction. Secondly you need funding and with a good team, you can start with private funding first to see how it goes, then from private funding you will know what's left and how to go for public fundraising in this case an IEO because I don't think anyone will pay attention once they hear ICO. And lastly, if your idea is so unique it might get the attention of top exchanges like Binance, even if it doesn't other good exchanges are there to help out.

[CashbackLover]

Most projects with No Ico and No Premine are well supported that's why they don't need funds but in your case I'm sure you need money for development, it's better to plan for IEO fundraising, it's not wrong even if you don't like it

[Alexmagn84]

Many projects giving fake promising then after they're getting scamming. So investors do not want trust ico even i would like ieo. At least if you need some funds for increasing development of your products. Even i can't imagine it because this time you can't make many investors i hope.

[qomariah95]

Many projects giving fake promising then after they're getting scamming. So investors do not want trust ico even i would like ieo. At least if you need some funds for increasing development of your products. Even i can't imagine it because this time you can't make many investors i hope.

There are reasons that can give investors more confidence. Indeed the system still uses IEO, but to provide more trust. Projects that are doing IEO, there really must be progress. So investors see that the project is really good and needs funds for further development.

[thesmallgod]

We are on the same page. I also have a project at hand but no money and I do not intend getting the money through ICO or IEO this is because I discovered lesser people are investing in project startup everyday so crowdfunding won't be a way out. I do not want to put people at risk. So here is what I am envisaging which I believe could help alot. Try to source for private investors and partnership with people that have resources that you believe could help your project. You can write a proposal and mail them or try approaching them via twitter DM if you are on social media. It is very good that you schedule video meeting via zoom or Skype if you received positive response. You can also look out for grants provided for individuals with novel projects. There are many of them being posted every year by private and public entity. You just may need to compete with other great mind like you but it worth trying. Nobody knows you could win the grant.

[bussybuddy]

Many projects giving fake promising then after they're getting scamming. So investors do not want trust ico even i would like ieo. At least if you need some funds for increasing development of your products. Even i can't imagine it because this time you can't make many investors i hope.

There are reasons that can give investors more confidence. Indeed the system still uses IEO, but to provide more trust. Projects that are doing IEO, there really must be progress. So investors see that the project is really good and needs funds for further development.

Agree, projects created without capital for development are difficult to succeed. They need to have some initial capital to help the project work and to do something to help investors trust the project. They can then implement IEO to continue raising funds

[Script3d]

Many projects giving fake promising then after they're getting scamming. So investors do not want trust ico even i would like ieo. At least if you need some funds for increasing development of your products. Even i can't imagine it because this time you can't make many investors i hope.

There are reasons that can give investors more confidence. Indeed the system still uses IEO, but to provide more trust. Projects that are doing IEO, there really must be progress. So investors see that the project is really good and needs funds for further development.

Agree, projects created without capital for development are difficult to succeed. They need to have some initial capital to help the project work and to do something to help investors trust the project. They can then implement IEO to continue raising funds

If they don't have capital the developers can just distribute the coin for free, like airdrops for example, in this way the dev can distribute the supply without doing crowdfunding.

[Iyeman]

if you really need a lot of funds then you need to do ICO/IEO but if you can get your own investors to fund the project that you are developing now then there is no need to do ICO/IEO

Yes, but for now if the project developer wants more funds for the project, the choice is through IEO on a good exchange bro, not through ICO because investors now no longer trust ICO since there are many scammers in ICO in the last two years.

it's really sad when discussing ICO the last 2 years, many investors are very disappointed with ico and now it is quite difficult to build investor confidence but it's a matter of trying and rebuilding trust in ico

So many investors have become the new millionaires before there were so many scam projects. ICO is something that can be judge right now but the scammers who have drowned the reputation of icos.

As long as that's a good ico and people who trust it will need the ico.

[bluebit25]

Many projects giving fake promising then after they're getting scamming. So investors do not want trust ico even i would like ieo. At least if you need some funds for increasing development of your products. Even i can't imagine it because this time you can't make many investors i hope.

There are reasons that can give investors more confidence. Indeed the system still uses IEO, but to provide more trust. Projects that are doing IEO, there really must be progress. So investors see that the project is really good and needs funds for further development.

Agree, projects created without capital for development are difficult to succeed. They need to have some initial capital to help the project work and to do something to help investors trust the project. They can then implement IEO to continue raising funds

If they don't have capital the developers can just distribute the coin for free, like airdrops for example, in this way the dev can distribute the supply without doing crowdfunding.

Even they don't need to make a bounty or airdrop. As long as they have a budget and list it at exchanges, then they burn the token on a quarterly basis, I believe its value will increase every year.

[btc78]

I ’m a technician, but I do n’t know how to promote it.
I hope that like Satoshi Nakamoto, there is no ICO, no pre-mining, but no one will develop for free. All need money.
The isomorphic multi-chain solution was designed by myself. The core technology has been implemented and verified to be feasible.

I can complete the technical project by myself.
I have developed the first technical version and will finish the second technical version.
The next plan is an application, which requires a formal team and a lot of funding.
The project is online more than half a year, but the promotion is slow.

You can little by little mate,If you really have a skills then you can have your business in right time.
Being a technician is respectable and if you can add another taste on that then why hesitate?

No need for ICO just have a good advertising plan,to promote your project and in time there will be fruit.Just make sure that your dedication and perseverance is always there ine very step of the way.

[Davian144]

Most projects with No Ico and No Premine are well supported that's why they don't need funds but in your case I'm sure you need money for development, it's better to plan for IEO fundraising, it's not wrong even if you don't like it

Obviously it's a natural thing because projects without ICO and Premine are projects that already have funds and most of those projects also have products to market so that the project can be more quickly successful because of the many supports from other parties, and it's clearly different with projects that do not yet have funds for development, so the team must use the time to make good fundraising, namely through IEO, so that they can be successful.

[Taufik blackspade team]

Obviously it's a natural thing because projects without ICO and Premine are projects that already have funds and most of those projects also have products to market so that the project can be more quickly successful because of the many supports from other parties, and it's clearly different with projects that do not yet have funds for development, so the team must use the time to make good fundraising, namely through IEO, so that they can be successful.

yes, they have strong financial support. projects like that have big people in them. usually, they are a combination of several CEO projects that have been successful in the market and create new projects. don't need ICO but they already have very strong market support.

[pilosopotasyo]

Do not kill your project with ICO, it looks good to try private funding instead there are people who like to back up and fund start-up projects, meet business-minded people in your locality and those interests are blockchains, from there, your project can take off.   

[bits4books]

I apologize of course but there are a lot of people like you.  Every day more and more "young talents" think that their project is so cool that it will take off on its own, like BTC. In fact without PR your project will notice only your friends or acquaintance. Decide first whether you need it at all and what you want - this will be the answer whether you need an ICO or not.
Spoiler: just forget and stop believing in fairy tales. If you just like to do it as a home project then OK but if you do it for something (for money of course) it's easier to forget and score.

[TastyChillySauce00]

Many projects giving fake promising then after they're getting scamming. So investors do not want trust ico even i would like ieo. At least if you need some funds for increasing development of your products. Even i can't imagine it because this time you can't make many investors i hope.

There are reasons that can give investors more confidence. Indeed the system still uses IEO, but to provide more trust. Projects that are doing IEO, there really must be progress. So investors see that the project is really good and needs funds for further development.

Agree, projects created without capital for development are difficult to succeed. They need to have some initial capital to help the project work and to do something to help investors trust the project. They can then implement IEO to continue raising funds

If they don't have capital the developers can just distribute the coin for free, like airdrops for example, in this way the dev can distribute the supply without doing crowdfunding.

Even they don't need to make a bounty or airdrop. As long as they have a budget and list it at exchanges, then they burn the token on a quarterly basis, I believe its value will increase every year.

I rarely saw the projects that used their own money. It's so difficult to be listed on a good exchange site without a lot of money. We should back again to the topic. Op is only the party that can answer his question of whether he needs ico or not.

[smyslov]

As you can see a lot of people are commenting about you not pushing with your ICO, you can do IEO or private funding or gamble with your own money if the project is really that good it will take off, it will gain a lot of supporters and people will be in a hurry to be part of the project but right now ICO is being shun by investors..

[amos77978]

I ’m a technician, but I do n’t know how to promote it.
I hope that like Satoshi Nakamoto, there is no ICO, no pre-mining, but no one will develop for free. All need money.
The isomorphic multi-chain solution was designed by myself. The core technology has been implemented and verified to be feasible.

I can complete the technical project by myself.
I have developed the first technical version and will finish the second technical version.
The next plan is an application, which requires a formal team and a lot of funding.
The project is online more than half a year, but the promotion is slow.

from all you've done so far.. I dont think theres need for initial coin offerings.. what you need is simply more exposure of your product and how to attract new investors.. or probably private sales (funding) Is another option... Goodluck all thesame

[judaspriest]

if from my observation people only like ICO to the extent of 20%, 80% is to follow IEO in large exchanges,
because ICO has a bad history of investors will not take the same risk