Just my thought about new projects that list on binance

[Greatdev]

For all projects that aimed for binance as their first ever exchange should know that they are in for serious work, all eye are on you for listing on binance, many investors will want the best from you so no chance to relent, if you fail on a top exchange you will lose

This is different from a project that starts it's journey from small exchanges, e.g three to four exchanges before finally getting listed on binance.

Most especially IEO projects on binance launchpad, it doesn't make sense to get all that hype and x5 and later dump like shitcoin, many devs are getting is wrong, going binance or top Exchange as the first Exchange is like inviting death on your project if you aren't ever ready to begin with.

[1714940678]

1714940678

[makishart]

The problem is not with the listing on the binance but there were so many pumpers and dumpers ( price manipulators on binance that used IEO as a way to fool the shrimp)

It's very different when there was a project that started from the bottom caused by it has a very strong support after being listed on binance.

The fundamental of both native project and IEO are different.

[Mulann2]

For all projects that aimed for binance as their first ever exchange should know that they are in for serious work, all eye are on you for listing on binance, many investors will want the best from you so no chance to relent, if you fail on a top exchange you will lose

This is different from a project that starts it's journey from small exchanges, e.g three to four exchanges before finally getting listed on binance.

Most especially IEO projects on binance launchpad, it doesn't make sense to get all that hype and x5 and later dump like shitcoin, many devs are getting is wrong, going binance or top Exchange as the first Exchange is like inviting death on your project if you aren't ever ready to begin with.

Binance don't make project better, this is wrong perception, the only that I can say Binance does is create good volume for a project token/coin, make it accessible to many users, in the case of working hard and making project up to expectations is entirely up to the project team, if you can afford to be listed on Binance,  you can also afford to take your project to the next level.

[TheUltraElite]

For all projects that aimed for binance as their first ever exchange should know that they are in for serious work,

Nope, because Binance has a large number of users does not make listing there as serious something. A crowfunded project is often in the lookout for private investments and that is where Binance comes in. You all fail to realize that in reality Binance has funded that project too and this is listing on their exchange is a result of the same.

many investors will want the best from you so no chance to relent, if you fail on a top exchange you will lose

Bullshit. Majority of ICOs have been failures anyway so no use comparing them.

This is different from a project that starts it's journey from small exchanges, e.g three to four exchanges before finally getting listed on binance.

That is the healthy growth. You need to open your eyes and clean your brain from shilldropping.

Of course you are to shill about their launchpad. But you need to improve your methods of shilling you know.

[binhvo1505]

Yes, due to the responsibility and prestige at work, Binance has now been voted one of the best exchanges in crypto market. They always choose the best projects to list and to build their reputation. This is a pretty good policy and only good projects can work with Binance. They work very organized and disciplined so everything related to Binance can make a lot of money.

[stadus]

Binance is a popular site, so there's always a hype happening especially when there is new project in IEO.

yes, it could dump after it pump, but that's how the market works now because when you invest, you should look on the long term potential of the project but we can't deny there's a lot of investors who like short term profit.

just pick which exchange do you like.

when listed in BInance, it will pump then dump..

in other exchange, when its listed, it will dump right away.. that's the sad reality now, devs choose the better exchange at the current situation.

[Kotone]

Most especially IEO projects on binance launchpad, it doesn't make sense to get all that hype and x5 and later dump like shitcoin, many devs are getting is wrong, going binance or top Exchange as the first Exchange is like inviting death on your project if you aren't ever ready to begin with.

Not really its the market who decides whether they leave the token or not for certain period of time. Whales are always like that once they are finished with a hype project then they just drop it and get out on the scene. This is typical and normal on crypto trading. Its just that binance is their favorite place to gang up this activity.

[tsaroz]

IEO on binance till date has an impressive record of giving back on value. The number are low but none of them have gone below their IEO price which is much different from almost all other IEOs and ICOs. You don't need to worry if you have the vision, a roadmap and an dedicated team, you can achieve anything from a good funding which could be made easier by launching the IEO on tier 1 exchange.

[Mighty_crypt]

Many projects from binance are below ICO price now, I think this is the best time to invest on them because they can easily recover to the ICO price someday but if you are into short term profits it better to sell after a launchpad became successful on binance

[Natalim]

It's been the reputation of Binance that it will pump the coin when it's listed in their exchange, even prior to the IEO, people are already easily get hype once a coin is listed in Binance. I read an article in the past that Binance are helping the coin to pump, they require a big listing fee but they are also investing on a certain coin that is listed in an exchange.

And until now that we move on to the new format of crowdsale, people are still wanting this pump and dump and actually only those who loss will complain.
As what the devs said many times, they are not in control of their coins once its already in exchange, it's the traders who are controlling it.

[unusualfacts30]

It is an extremely large exchange but the success of project also depend on other things and not just listing on binance. It can help get a big boost if whats being listed is also improving things in the background but simply listing there will not help and in some cases it can be harmful. I think thats why its important to start with small exchange and move your way up.

[qigong13]

From what I saw, a new project to list Binance is a high risk, high reward move. If that project fails on Binance then no way you could make it or 'have a second chance in lower exchange. If they're a good project then nothing to worry about and their reach will be huge thanks to Binance.

[Byakuga]

The problem is not with listing on binance but what happens after listing on binance, I believe bad projects can find their way into top exchanges too that's why it's good to always do research on projects before investing, what matters is not entirely where the projects are listed but what we can use the projects for

[20kevin20]

The hype that's created when a coin gets listed on Binance makes no sense and is only a short-lived one. If Binance announced today that BTC will be delisted, it'd make Bitcoin no less superior than all the other coins. Let's remember that Binance is a privately owned company/corporation and their choices do not necessarily reflect demand or reality.

Exchanges usually request an amount of BTC to have a coin listed on them, and that is a fact that makes me skeptical when it comes to the artificial hype for having a coin listed somewhere. A coin could be listed today & delisted tomorrow. It doesn't mean that, for 24h, the coin had success. It only means that CZ changed his mind for specific reasons. Most coins on most exchanges are garbage anyway. The only thing that a coin listing on an exchange reflects is the exchange owner's interests. That's it.

[leea-1334]

For all projects that aimed for binance as their first ever exchange should know that they are in for serious work, all eye are on you for listing on binance, many investors will want the best from you so no chance to relent, if you fail on a top exchange you will lose

This is different from a project that starts it's journey from small exchanges, e.g three to four exchanges before finally getting listed on binance.

Most especially IEO projects on binance launchpad, it doesn't make sense to get all that hype and x5 and later dump like shitcoin, many devs are getting is wrong, going binance or top Exchange as the first Exchange is like inviting death on your project if you aren't ever ready to begin with.

And this is exactly what happened on a lot of projects who listed with Binance launchpads. You talk about x5 during the hype then the dump? Some coins even got dumped as soon as the IEO ended (when listing and trading began),,, that was how bad it was because DURING the IEO there was so much attention that projects could not cope with.

[minairia3]

For all projects that aimed for binance as their first ever exchange should know that they are in for serious work, all eye are on you for listing on binance, many investors will want the best from you so no chance to relent, if you fail on a top exchange you will lose

Maybe if they also have funds. Do you think all those tokens that have been listed on Binance as their first exchange needs all the effort? I doubt all have done the same, but typically they will do all the serious desktop job in order to make it succesful. Binance should not be a standard for some projects in order to pursue success. There are other exchange almost same caliber with them that will accept potential projects too.

IEO is a great method for crowfunding, but I find it simply a way to deduce more funds, especially during trading and take profits afterward leaving the potential project becomes shitcoin once again.

[bayudndy]

The problem is not with listing on binance but what happens after listing on binance, I believe bad projects can find their way into top exchanges too that's why it's good to always do research on projects before investing, what matters is not entirely where the projects are listed but what we can use the projects for

Bad projects are never listed on top exchanges. Exchanges will have processes for evaluating projects, and if they are good and quality, they will definitely be listed. But if those projects are bad and of poor quality, they will certainly be excluded even if they have a lot of money to pay for the exchange. The reputation of large exchanges is always preferred