Minimum standard for posting in "Reputation" board

[Pffrt]

For a long time, I used to see a lot of unnecessary drama threads in "Reputation" board. Some of them are just useless at all and have no point to be existed. Most of the threads are kind of personal attack for the self benefit, revenge and some are being jealous to other users. Why such kind of thread don't get a place in the off topic board? I think there should be minimum standard required to post in "Reputation" board. Otherwise it will be full of threads which doesn't make sense at all. Something must be done.

[1714975134]

1714975134

[1714975134]

1714975134

[1714975134]

1714975134

[LoyceMobile]

That doesn't fit the forum's mission of being as free as possible. Who's going to decide what's up to standard?
If it's insubstantial, you can already report it.


I dislike most if the drama too.

[Mbitr]

You are correct in saying there is a lot of drama in the Reputation board , so please let it stay there ! IMHO if you try to bring in a ‘ Standard’ of some sort , this drama may well spill over into other sections of the forum, please let it stay where it is  Off topic is crazy enough as it is !

[bonesjonesreturns]

For a long time, I used to see a lot of unnecessary drama threads in "Reputation" board. Some of them are just useless at all and have no point to be existed. Most of the threads are kind of personal attack for the self benefit, revenge and some are being jealous to other users. Why such kind of thread don't get a place in the off topic board? I think there should be minimum standard required to post in "Reputation" board. Otherwise it will be full of threads which doesn't make sense at all. Something must be done.

This is clearly untrue.

This person is clearly trying to misrepresent what is taking place here

There is undeniable proof of scamming this is undeniable and robust.

There is no disputing this or denying it.

The evidence can be reviewed here

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5249969.0

Several DT members are attempting to null a legitimate flag based on incontrovertible proof of scamming.

That is not to be confused with drama or personal disputes.

Attempting to conflate legitimate warnings of scamming or legitimate warnings of willful and deliberate scammer supporting must be highlighted in rep.

Please understand these points are only nonsensical to you because you are too retarded to understand this "drama "is based on incontrovertible proof of scamming and scammer supporting.

Each member scamming or supporting scammers should and will have their own evidence based thread in rep.

Debunk the evidence or accept your thread.

Undeniable objective independently verifiable evidence of scamming is not a personal attack. I want you to confirm that you have read and understood. Further repetition of your false and misleading representation of the actual events must result in your own dedicated thread.

Sadly there must be strong recognition for the cancer that is supporting and facilitating scams here.

I threaten scammers and scammer supporters with publicly presenting the truth about them openly  and willingly. Suck it up and get used to it scumbags.

Scammer supporting and protecting is just as bad as scamming.

The minimum standard should be a post accompanied by objective independently verifiable evidence corroborating the points being made. Most DT just screaming: trolling, personal attack, lies, doesnt make any sense and other bogus faux rebuttals in the face of undeniable evidence of scamming. It is laughable.

Each a scammer and scammer supporter where there is objective independently verifiable  evidence of scamming or scammer supporting will have their own thread. Sorry about that.

Debunk the evidence and clear your name or be correctly and accurately labelled  a scammer or scammer supporter.

Crying trolling or lying or personal attack is just music to my ears. I enjoy hearing these weak ass crying defenses as I crush them and those supporting them.  You are all my bitches.  Thay is simply the truth.  

The truth will not be hidden or covered up any longer.

[YOSHIE]

The title is different "the purpose of the topic content might be the same".....!

@ dkbit98, already asked a question about this: Topic: Arguing/Insult Section in Offtopic, maybe you can find answers there, there are various answers answered by members.
You can see it, maybe.

Or maybe you can see this answer at a glance.

Leave Reputation section.

I don't blame every user who comes to Reputation with a drama full of crap and insistence that is done by the members here.

Offtopic I think there is no need, because, button, Ignore works very well, if you feel disturbed and annoying.

If reviewed from the true meaning of "Reputation" is indeed right.
A little review "Reputation or other words Citra".
Reputation can be defined in a proverb (a picture of mind) means a picture that is shed in the mind / brain of someone, the image of someone who can change in a bad or negative outlook, with a note at a later date if it is not supported by the ability and vice versa of the real and actual circumstances, that is Reputation.
Which can be interpreted again as feelings, impressions, and an image deliberately done and created by someone about the facts or can be defined an understanding arising from oneself based on information or pressureobtained.

That's why everyone starts in the Reputation section, no wonder, if there is drama in this section, Reputation has become an actual place, it can't be separated, as the name suggests.

Nothing is to blame, all have free speech.

[suchmoon]

The drama is easily solved by ignoring certain users and/or skipping over certain topics. Report garbage to moderators if you care enough. Last time I looked there were less than 10 threads on the front page of Reputation that seemed to be started with the sole purpose of personal attacks. The number may have increased recently but that shit will fall off the front page soon enough unless people keep bumping it.

[marlboroza]

Reputation that seemed to be started with the sole purpose of personal attacks.

All these topics are nonsensical and bunch of lies and user(s) behind this is(are) directly attacking employer 

The number may have increased recently but that shit will fall off the front page soon enough unless people keep bumping it.

Yes, but at this point troll started to create flags.

Report garbage to moderators if you care enough.

Well, mprep did say something about it, I will report one topic to see how it will be handled and update this post later.

[The Cryptovator]

Simple solution is don't feed the troll. User are creating useless post because we are feeding them by replying. If theymos set a standard for posting there then all post will be on meta against theymos. So it will be more complicated to stop troll. If you prevent them on a section then they will choose another and it will never stop. Users have freedom of speech, just let them speak, and ignore if you don't like to feed.

Report garbage to moderators if you care enough.

It doesn't going to bring any benefits since they spent lots of time to write a topics. Simply it wouldn't consider as a spam post.

[skarais]

Simple solution is don't feed the troll.

and to prevent being seen again, ignore the user. If we dont ignore it then I am sure they can still get other users into the drama.

OP, we know that this forum is a good place to express opinions and free speech is the right of all users. But I dont think you need to do much if you dont want to be involved in the drama, just ignore it and report to the moderator if you find a post that breaks the rules.

[bonesjonesreturns]

Simple solution is don't feed the troll.

and to prevent being seen again, ignore the user. If we dont ignore it then I am sure they can still get other users into the drama.

OP, we know that this forum is a good place to express opinions and free speech is the right of all users. But I dont think you need to do much if you dont want to be involved in the drama, just ignore it and report to the moderator if you find a post that breaks the rules.

Hey Roobet , can you explain the difference between drama and a valuable scammer warning ?
Take your time.

One main issue with the forum is that peasantry and stupidity often reside with in the same worthless organism. However these sub human scum willing to say or do anything for bitcoin dust is a residual problem that will only be resolved by covid 19s cousin that targets pure weak and spineless greedy dregs that will sell their mothers for some Chinese tat. 

Drama seems to be the new " buzz" word that is meant to convince other sub human dregs here that you can avoid engaging in debate and dealing with independently verifiable evidence. You know that isn't a good idea since the truth demonstrates that you are simply a bunch of scammer supporters for meager reward.

So can you present some " drama" that you believe you can debunk as utter nonsense that has no place on the rep board?

I want details and a a clear conclusive debunking of this groundless drama

Anyone here can present some examples.

When people are unable or run away when examples of their claims are requested, then you know the person is full of shit.

Bring me examples of empty drama that is groundless nonsense that you will debunk here.

Now.

[The Sceptical Chymist]

Something must be done.

I disagree, though I wouldn't dispute some of the points you made about mud-slinging and the like.  The thing is, Reputation is the section to post things in if you have a problem with a member that doesn't rise to the level of a scam accusation (in which case it should go in that section). 

Nor have I noticed Reputation having gotten any worse lately except for when certain trolls like CH and his alts start threads there--and if you don't like a particular member's drama threads, you can always hit that ignore button. 

Report garbage to moderators if you care enough.

Yeah, that's always an option as well if there's some serious trolling going on.

[JeromeTash]

People should learn to ignore trolls. There are some posts one can clearly see as an attempt to get attention and stir drama. Don't respond to them and see how quickly they will sink down the drain and how hurt the troll will feel. Eventual they will give up.

I no longer bother to even complete reading titles from posts by people like @bonesjonesreturns and i guess am not the only one. So however much he tries to make sense in his other posts, people will always see it as a joke, because he is the one who led to the situation to begin with.

[bonesjonesreturns]

People should learn to ignore trolls. There are some posts one can clearly see as an attempt to get attention and stir drama. Don't respond to them and see how quickly they will sink down the drain and how hurt the troll will feel. Eventual they will give up.

I no longer bother to even complete reading titles from posts by people like @bonesjonesreturns and i guess am not the only one. So however much he tries to make sense in his other posts, people will always see it as a joke, because he is the one who led to the situation to begin with.

I will simply reiterate my previous challenge

Provide specific examples of the conclusively debunked information I have presented on rep?

Anyone?

Anyone here at all?

Or are you all spouting shit and you can not even provide one debunked point that I have made.

Think about it haha

I mean if you all claim every one of those rep threads are bogus and should not even be created then why is it you can not debunk even one point? Let alone asking you to debunk an entire thread lol

Now we go back to endless " ignore his lies " ignore his trolling " " he is a horrible boy"

Face it every thread is true and the truth is simply inconvenient?

I'm presenting objective independently verifiable evidence. You are all crying haha

I like it. Carry on.

Yes there should be a minimum standard for posting in rep. It is called observable independently verifiable evidence to fully corroborate your points.

Crying trolling or crying drama does not meet those standards that ensure the truth is located. Keep crying though because it makes me horny. 

[suchmoon]

Well, mprep did say something about it, I will report one topic to see how it will be handled and update this post later.

Not sure if this specific rule would apply here but I think creating massive walls of text about pretty much every user who disagreed with the troll, opposed a flag, etc could be considered "low value" and at the very least should be merged into one thread since it's all about one and the same thing really.

Or we could just ignore it and save moderators' time for more important stuff, like censoring dirty pictures.