Slots are better than Dice.

[pakhitheboss]

In my opinion both are best. It primarily depends on the comfort level of the player. For me dice is better than slots as it is way more simple and you do not need to break your head to understand the game. On the other hand those who understand slots prefer playing it as it generates more interest. I prefer both depending on my mood.

[1715285841]

1715285841

[1715285841]

1715285841

[20kevin20]

Ah, here we go again - the old "I prefer this game as it gives me more chances to win". I came to the conclusion that any game you play and any strategy you choose, gambling is gambling and changing payouts (or going for longer sessions) only change the length of the timeline before you bust.

It all really comes down to personal preferences. You could bet 10BTC and hope for a $1.2k easy win with a 98% chance of winning and bust instead within the first try. That's an insta-bust. On the other hand, you could bet a satoshi with some "better strat" and bust within 24h of non-stop autobets. The only difference is the session length.

[khaled0111]

I understand why you get that feeling but your reasoning is flawed.
It's true that while chasing the JackPot on slots you will have some winning spins (usually small rewards) unlike when playing dice where whether you win or you lose. However, you didn't take into consideration two important variable:
     - HE which is far bigger for slots
     - odds to hit the JackPot.
Both combined, will make your profit/loss almost the same on both games (in the long run).

[Wexnident]

I don't think there's a need to even compare the two. I mean, gambling is a form of entertainment, its for fun, I see no need to compare it whether it be based on the amount of winnings you can get or the amount of entertainment you can get from both. Even more so with seeing it as a source of income. It's just like how games are if you play games as an item farmer (players who grind items and sell them for irl currency), it turns really boring. Just like in gambling where if you see it as a source of income, the fun factor disappears and you just get stressed all day cause of losing.

I'm not sure if you can call a chance to take a hit an optimal strategy though.

Slot is actually the most famous in traditional casinos, its what brings more money to the casino than any games. There was a survey I've read somewhere which interviews casino owners and results indicate that slots are widely being played mostly by casinos goers.

Blackjack's chances are more optimal since there's a much higher chance of winning constantly compared to slots. You can also see what's going on with the game yourself, making it like you're seeing the entire code, unlike with slots. Though I do agree with slots being a staple in traditional casinos, even with online casinos.

[robelneo]

I think that slots are way better than dice because of their payout structure. Lets say you are hunting 99x in dice, in this hunt you will not get paid if you hit 98x. But in slots things are different and you will get paid for every hit though you are aiming for jackpot.
I know that most of the slots pay like 80-92% of what goes into slots but still if you compare it with dice (specially hit and run method) it is more profitable in long run (although in long run you will eventually loose in both games because of house edge)
I want you to ponder upon this and please tell me how much I am right in this line of reasoning.  

Both are excited to play I am more on dice than slot the winning structure is high on the slot games but the odds to win a jackpot is quite high, although both are games of luck, you can still employ a strategy on dice games, the most popular is the martingale, although not very effective but always worth trying, but if you just want to have fun, slots are more exciting no strategy involve just pure luck.

[Yaunfitda]

Depends on individual preferences, but if you are going to look at the math behind and the chance then it's going to be complicated and I don't think that gamblers are willing to look at it. In the long run you can get busted easily regardless of how much capital you have and how much x% you are targeting.

So you are neither right or wrong, others might have some strategy when they play dice but sooner or later house edge will catch up.

[Twinkledoe]

Depends on individual preferences, but if you are going to look at the math behind and the chance then it's going to be complicated and I don't think that gamblers are willing to look at it. In the long run you can get busted easily regardless of how much capital you have and how much x% you are targeting.

So you are neither right or wrong, others might have some strategy when they play dice but sooner or later house edge will catch up.

I consider them both in the same level of chance of winning, as they are really based on pure luck. So I don't think either one of them is better than the other. Though there are players do some certain strategies just to get ahead like martingale in dice, but still you can't rely on that strategy because it will only work for certain period and you can't depend on it in any way.

[noormcs5]

I think that slots are way better than dice because of their payout structure. Lets say you are hunting 99x in dice, in this hunt you will not get paid if you hit 98x. But in slots things are different and you will get paid for every hit though you are aiming for jackpot.
I know that most of the slots pay like 80-92% of what goes into slots but still if you compare it with dice (specially hit and run method) it is more profitable in long run (although in long run you will eventually loose in both games because of house edge)
I want you to ponder upon this and please tell me how much I am right in this line of reasoning. 

I play both slot and dice at different times. I feel both of them are good and it depends upon my mood which one to play. Dice games are more simpler and easy to play if you are a beginner. I remember when i first started gambling, i only used to play dice.

[kotajikikox]

we have our own preferences in each gambling game we play and this will depend upon gamblers for what they find to be fit in their desire chances.
Not because you thing Slots is good meaning i will support you because for me Dice is the best and easy game to play in casinos.

Slots has once in a billion chances of winning while in dice i believe that the winning is much closer compared to slot.

So you are neither right or wrong, others might have some strategy when they play dice but sooner or later house edge will catch up.

This is indeed and its about the strategy we are lying here because if straight playing both needs pure luck but if we have our knowledge added when we play then it depends on our desire ways of betting.

[maydna]

When a gambler is often playing slots, he would say slots are better than the other gambling games. But if a gambler plays random gambling games, he would not choose only one gambling games because he likes to change the gambling games to play. So every player or gambler will have their own favourite gambling games because once they found the games that can make them comfortable, they will stay at that games, and they will not change to another gambling game. They can switch to another gambling game when they feel bored sometimes, but they will back to their favourite games, and play it again.

[Yatsan]

Depends on individual preferences, but if you are going to look at the math behind and the chance then it's going to be complicated and I don't think that gamblers are willing to look at it. In the long run you can get busted easily regardless of how much capital you have and how much x% you are targeting.

So you are neither right or wrong, others might have some strategy when they play dice but sooner or later house edge will catch up.

Both are just a based on luck and doesn't need any logical reasoning or what. The winning chance of slot to dice are the same and I think the only thing that matters here are what on those two are giving you more entertainment and what on those two games did you really enjoy. Sometimes we are feeling that the other game is better if we got more lucky on that game. But as long as they are games that are based on luck and doesn't really need any skill then, they are just all the same.

If you enjoy slots rather than dice then, Slots are better than dice (for you).  

[Debonaire217]

Both games are good depending on what makes you happier when you are playing it.

I tried Slots in online, and it gives me more fun since I can see allot of colors and it seems that there's a higher chance for me to win because of many combinations available.

But if we are seeking for a game that can give as fast profit, dice is much simpler and the chances of winning could be 50/50.

The similarities that I can see in both is that you don't need to have too much experience to understand the game, thus I can offer it to newbies in gambling before they engage blackjack, poker, and other complicated card games.

[akhjob]

I think that slots are way better than dice because of their payout structure. Lets say you are hunting 99x in dice, in this hunt you will not get paid if you hit 98x. But in slots things are different and you will get paid for every hit though you are aiming for jackpot.
I know that most of the slots pay like 80-92% of what goes into slots but still if you compare it with dice (specially hit and run method) it is more profitable in long run (although in long run you will eventually loose in both games because of house edge)
I want you to ponder upon this and please tell me how much I am right in this line of reasoning. 

I don't think this is a correct method to compare the profitability of both the games. Both Slots and Dice are completely random and purely luck-based games. In luck-based games house edge is the most important factor to be compared, if you compare them, you'll find that Dice is better than Slots. Slot is the easiest way to lose your money if you are not lucky.

Blackjack still no different since you still rely to your luck. You hit when you think you'll lose because the house might just hit the right card to equate more than you have if you stand. If luck is on your side you win.

But what OP says is that you still get rewards even if you didn't hit the jackpot with slot. I'm not a fan of playing Slots though. It feels not random to me. 

Blackjack is definitely not a luck-based game, if you are a bit skilled you can clearly reduce your loses even when you are unlucky. Most card games like Blackjack, Poker etc require a certain level of skill to make profits. But in Dice and Slots, there is no skill involved. So Card games and sports bets are always better than luck based games

[serjent05]

I think that slots are way better than dice because of their payout structure. Lets say you are hunting 99x in dice, in this hunt you will not get paid if you hit 98x. But in slots things are different and you will get paid for every hit though you are aiming for jackpot.
I know that most of the slots pay like 80-92% of what goes into slots but still if you compare it with dice (specially hit and run method) it is more profitable in long run (although in long run you will eventually loose in both games because of house edge)
I want you to ponder upon this and please tell me how much I am right in this line of reasoning. 

It depends on the odds.  If you play dice with high odds, though it is hard to win (well same goes with slots with higher payout), you can also win a huge amount of money.  Like for example, if you bet in dice with 3666x multiplier, isn't that way bigger than slots winning?

[Bitinity]

I think that slots are way better than dice because of their payout structure. Lets say you are hunting 99x in dice, in this hunt you will not get paid if you hit 98x. But in slots things are different and you will get paid for every hit though you are aiming for jackpot.
I know that most of the slots pay like 80-92% of what goes into slots but still if you compare it with dice (specially hit and run method) it is more profitable in long run (although in long run you will eventually loose in both games because of house edge)
I want you to ponder upon this and please tell me how much I am right in this line of reasoning. 

It depends on the odds.  If you play dice with high odds, though it is hard to win (well same goes with slots with higher payout), you can also win a huge amount of money.  Like for example, if you bet in dice with 3666x multiplier, isn't that way bigger than slots winning?

Many slots pays up to 10k payout even higher. What makes it different within dice and slots in case of hunting big payout is about its chance. As OP said, we should get the exact range of number while hunting big payout in dice game while we can get more chances to win big payout on slots game. I mean, every single spin on slot games has the chance to win big payout (not only 1 specified payout like ij dice).

[coin-investor]

I think that slots are way better than dice because of their payout structure. Lets say you are hunting 99x in dice, in this hunt you will not get paid if you hit 98x. But in slots things are different and you will get paid for every hit though you are aiming for jackpot.
I know that most of the slots pay like 80-92% of what goes into slots but still if you compare it with dice (specially hit and run method) it is more profitable in long run (although in long run you will eventually loose in both games because of house edge)
I want you to ponder upon this and please tell me how much I am right in this line of reasoning. 

Slots are only my second favorite after a dice game, it's hard to win a slot game it took me a whole month before I won in a slot game, compare on Dice where if you put a good strategy you have a chance to win, on the slot, there is no strategy involve just hit and wish yourself you are in luck.

[Swordsoffreedom]

I think that slots are way better than dice because of their payout structure. Lets say you are hunting 99x in dice, in this hunt you will not get paid if you hit 98x. But in slots things are different and you will get paid for every hit though you are aiming for jackpot. I know that most of the slots pay like 80-92% of what goes into slots but still if you compare it with dice (specially hit and run method) it is more profitable in long run (although in long run you will eventually loose in both games because of house edge) I want you to ponder upon this and please tell me how much I am right in this line of reasoning. 

We should be respect everyone's opinion. you think slot is much better than dice. If we analyses some point, you are right. When you play slot, you will get paid for every hit, you know that Dice is different from slot in this point. if you do gamble only for earn money and if it is your profession, then you should be avoided dice. But there are too many people who gamble cause they find enjoyment by doing this, they like dice, because they want to spend a quality time, they don't need money.

[Ryker1]

Well, I only play those games once and lucky enough that I won in slots as well not the jackpot but I still gained profit from it. But people differ in their interest some may find dice way better than slots and some the other way around depending on their preferences. Perhaps others some love games where their skills are being tested like poker and blackjack regardless of the winning, --or the prize that is at stake still they play the game that suits their preference. Indeed, either slots or dice will work for me for I am not particular to one game I gamble for fun and entertainment.

[ryzaadit]

I try some slot and never getting luck even until now~LOL.

Comparing with the dice, you still have some chance to be a winner even you are all in on the dice went you have a strong feeling using a few bait bets before doing all in. Slots were dependent on how much money you have, the more money you have would be good if playing slots but with dice you can do some magic getting a high multiplier with low fund money.

And about which games who really the best, I things all depend on the player went they more spent their money on dice sure they will said dice was better but if someone who playing slot a lot and have so much money for the bankroll to chase some jackpot. He probably will say slots were better than dice, and he has some experience hitting a jackpot multiple times.

[matchi2011]

Well, I only play those games once and lucky enough that I won in slots as well not the jackpot but I still gained profit from it. But people differ in their interest some may find dice way better than slots and some the other way around depending on their preferences. Perhaps others some love games where their skills are being tested like poker and blackjack regardless of the winning, --or the prize that is at stake still they play the game that suits their preference. Indeed, either slots or dice will work for me for I am not particular to one game I gamble for fun and entertainment.

The judgement are always differently since gamblers have different perceptions, those who loves playing dice will choose it no matter what while for people who enjoy slots they've got a good reason to choose this type of gambling with their own respective opinions in regards to why they're choosing it than playing dice.