Automated Merits for 100 Activities /Topics

[ChuckBuck]

I could understand that many of them not getting merits but automating it will totally oppose the purpose of merit. Why do you need Merit? if everyone has this automated merit how will you differentiate the quality among it? Anyone can easily automate to make spam posts without even his personal attention so it will not be helpful in anyway

Of course not useful  In a previous discussion, someone said that a merit is worth $ 20 to sell. It means it needs $ 2,000 to get member rank. Let's think about how many people will spam 1,000 posts to get 10 merits. I bet there will be a lot of guys like that, and this forum is full of garbage, Bitcoin Discussion will have thousands of new posts every day  Obsess!

[1715013213]

1715013213

[1715013213]

1715013213

[1715013213]

1715013213

[Mrengage]

I was thinking About probability In every possible earning on Bitcoin which lead me to see the other side based on the Bitcoin forum, Many People ask differently on merit way up But I think they forgot. The probability Aspect which I wish to share with you today, I don't think if One with 100 activities or 100 Topics  all of them will be wrong or shit topics and comments definitely  it's not true  maybe someone with proof will prove me wrong

 My suggestion is to have at least An Automated Merits for every 100 activities if that not persuasive let's be for every 100 Topics from one individual with  100 Individuals Contribution no matter what they on their comments this is only to acknowledge that Topics attracts more people.

I don't buy in to this idea, Now come again regarding this 100 topics one has to create before getting Merits it's definitely not a welcomed idea to me.

[iamsheikhadil]

That would break the motive with which the merit system was introduced. To prevent spammers from ranking up, the merit system really is working on a good level. While you are true that if a person has made hundred topics then surely there will be some topics which are of good quality and they will get merited eventually by merit sources or people who notice such posts. Automatic merit system would just encourage a lot more spam.

[Mrengage]

How about an automated ban if you create 100 topics without getting a single Merit?

Well, sounds good  But 100 topics or 100 posts? 100 topics seems to be a number that I and many others rarely achieve  Not to mention those who open topics regularly about accusations or reputation, regular users seem to never open their own topics. I only create 2 or 3 topics per month for myself  So 100 topics is really something far-fetched, but I support it, if someone don't even get one merit after having 100 threads on this forum, he should not continue here 

This

he should not continue here 

is a big lash out speech which means he or she is never meant to be in this forum for life. To me I welcome this idea but in the case of 100 topics is never possible I barely make post even up to months now, but the idea is well come. Which I could remember some made a post of how legendary rankers in the forum should be rewarded for quality post made by them here 👉 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5246995.

[ChuckBuck]

This

he should not continue here 

is a big lash out speech which means he or she is never meant to be in this forum for life. To me I welcome this idea but in the case of 100 topics is never possible I barely make post even up to months now, but the idea is well come. Which I could remember some made a post of how legendary rankers in the forum should be rewarded for quality post made by them here 👉 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5246995.

It could be a false statement of mine. To be honest, there are many users who haven't even been able to get a single merit since the merit system was implemented. For some people, getting some merit is really difficult. It is also not easy for me  But I know a lot of users that haven't even earned any merit since the merit system was born, although they are still active and post regularly. I had no idea how they were doing 

[hd49728]

It could be a false statement of mine. To be honest, there are many users who haven't even been able to get a single merit since the merit system was implemented. For some people, getting some merit is really difficult. It is also not easy for me   But I know a lot of users that haven't even earned any merit since the merit system was born, although they are still active and post regularly. I had no idea how they were doing  

It is not easy but is not an impossible task. You earned merits so it makes sense that you have been doing well and the community members appreciated your contributions or your works here.

For the group of users who have actively posted on the forum over the last 2 years and have not yet earned a single merits, they have their own issues. They are likely bounty hunters or shitposters and if they want to earn merit, they have to look at their posting style and post quality.
I have my contest: Sendable merit give away contest (Full Member and below ranks). Many applicants were rejected but there are a few winners. 

[plast555]

This

he should not continue here 

is a big lash out speech which means he or she is never meant to be in this forum for life. To me I welcome this idea but in the case of 100 topics is never possible I barely make post even up to months now, but the idea is well come. Which I could remember some made a post of how legendary rankers in the forum should be rewarded for quality post made by them here 👉 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5246995.

It could be a false statement of mine. To be honest, there are many users who haven't even been able to get a single merit since the merit system was implemented. For some people, getting some merit is really difficult. It is also not easy for me  But I know a lot of users that haven't even earned any merit since the merit system was born, although they are still active and post regularly. I had no idea how they were doing 

I agree there are such people who are getting affected on this but we may consider other solutions if possible who are posting regularly with some quality. This suggested method would ruin everything rather than helping a few such users. Another reason maybe not all of them are very good at writing but they try to overcome that but fails

[Malam90]

No, it is not really good for the forum community. There is no automated merit system in this forum now. If it is given 1 merit for 100 activities, shitposters will cheers for making 100 bounty report posting. If you post good topic which is very quality post, high rank members or merit sources can give you merit. This system is fine and it is still proved.

[noorman0]

_snip_ But I know a lot of users that haven't even earned any merit since the merit system was born, although they are still active and post regularly. I had no idea how they were doing 

If you mean users with Full rank and above before the merit system is implemented, I make sure they are still fine with their safe position to get bigger bounty stakes.

[libert19]

Nope, then it will be just like before merit implementation. It won't represent quality anymore, just how much time you have been active on forum.

[YOSHIE]

My suggestion is to have at least An Automated Merits for every 100 activities if that not persuasive let's be for every 100 Topics from one individual with  100 Individuals Contribution no matter what they on their comments this is only to acknowledge that Topics attracts more people.

if that's what you suggest 90% of members on this forum will catch up and make a post here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5250951.1500, to fulfill posts and activities and meet merit, in the end the forum no longer has members who have professional and useful ideas.

That will not happen in this forum ...!
Your idea is a bit regimental and messy, just for your own sake, without thinking about what you have to post without thinking, it's not good, before the rules of achievement are applied this has already happened.
The forum is full of posts (PROOF OF REGISTRATION).

[ChuckBuck]

If you mean users with Full rank and above before the merit system is implemented, I make sure they are still fine with their safe position to get bigger bounty stakes.

I don't see anything called safe position in this forum  from the perspective of the campaign managers, they will always choose the most active people in the community, there are many factors to consider someone, and the number of received merit is one of those factors. There are thousands of users in this forum, if you don't even earn a 10 merit within 120 days, you don't seem to have a chance to compete with anyone.