Despite Many Participants, You Can Still Get Huge Rewards In Bounty.

[joseyphil82]

Yes you will still be able to make some money from bounties that has no limited participants but the reward will be too low to cover the money you sent on data, it's not about getting a reward, it's about getting a reasonable amount of reward, what good is there to promote a project for months and get 10$ in return?

[1714787527]

1714787527

[1714787527]

1714787527

[Icologies]

it all depends on how the project is if the project is good even though the bounty hunters are many will definitely get a big profit
I've experienced this before the most important thing is  coin is listed on the market large volume, large enthusiasts and coin could pump

[bitcoinisbest]

Yes you will still be able to make some money from bounties that has no limited participants but the reward will be too low to cover the money you sent on data, it's not about getting a reward, it's about getting a reasonable amount of reward, what good is there to promote a project for months and get 10$ in return?

It is a fact at times that you support so much for the months and in the end you end up getting either peanuts or the coin price falls badly on start itself resulting in the end no money being made form the coin. This type of scenarios is far more and thus many have shifted from the bounty campaigns because it may not be worth their time.

[proTECH77]

Many are still joining bounty campaign to make money, despite the population of hunters in the campaign many are still making a huge reward at the end of the campaign.
I guess,those that make huge reward are those who really understand how social media work and how you can do your personal research to make a reliable profit at the end of the campaign.

Not everybody that is participating in bounty campaign, know how to achieve high profit but some are just there for a long time without achieving any big reward because most of them lack instructions. Those that got huge reward always follow rules and regulations of the campaign till the end.

[cheezcarls]

High quality Youtube videos, well-written articles, finding bugs and offer solutions, or creative campaigns are the ones that pays good (but not all, because it still depends on the market price, trading volume, etc.). Translation campaigns are so limited and hard to take spots because of too many candidates along with their portfolio. At least they pay decent amount rather than airdrops and social media tasks (with the exception of UNI of course).

I never participate in social media campaigns anymore, as they pay too low. Just saying.

[Lantind]

it all depends on how the project is if the project is good even though the bounty hunters are many will definitely get a big profit
I've experienced this before the most important thing is  coin is listed on the market large volume, large enthusiasts and coin could pump

Yes, it all depends on the project, but we also have to see the amount of allocation given by the project to the bounty program, if the allocation is small and the project is good, then automatically the participants will get a little profit, because a good project will always be enlivened by participants bounty.

[Fivestar4everMVP]

I personally stopped participating in social media campaigns a long time ago, it's always a waste of time and effort, i prefer to participate in signature campaigns cus the pay is always better even if they are many participants, just like the op said, those with lower ranks in here can always opt for article and video campaigns, though they can be very stressful though.

Well yes the bounty signature campaigns are giving much better rewards compared to social media campaigns, but I think this should not be our first concern. Because no matter how good the rewards is (despite of having many participants) if the project itself is not doing good then it will all be wasted. It can fail or turn as scam, thats why before we look for projects allocation for each promotion check first if it has potential to succeed in the future.

You are very right mate, i personally have had many of that experience in many signature campaigns, most of the tokens I earned from those campaigns are still sitting in my wallet with no means to sell them cus some of those projects have been abandoned, some have turned scam, others are simply too slow with development and are yet to even get listed on an exchange.
We all should be very careful of this kind of projects.

[Stanlo]

Too many participants will always ruin rewards for bounty hunters, I've learned my lessons and nothing can change that, bounty projects like ARCS and IQCash are good example about why unlimited participants is a bad choice, these projects are trading already but bounty manager or team allowed too many participants and in the end many get 10$ to 15$ from these projects, bounty hunters that participate in Cartesi bounty are able to make 100$ to 500$ simply because the BM use limited participants

Cartesi is not the best example in this case. Bounty hunters managed to get high rewards mostly because of IEO and listing on Binance.
Despite it, it will be really hard for Cartesi to stand out in cryptocommunity with only 1 product case (Creeps game) and that time DApps on Linux where not the most demanded ones.

That's something that holders need to worry about or Bounty Hunters who likes holding tokens, what this guy is really saying is that Cartesi bounty campaign is the best so far probably because the BM used limited participants, I knew someone who made 800$ from Cartesi bounty, this is possible because of limited on participants

[Cornia]

I Have Observed So Many Times That Article And Video Campaigns Have Less Participants

As i know that video campaigns have less participants but article campaign haven't less participants now a days. Reddit and Linkedin campaigns have relatively fewer participants.  Hunters must know the bounty pool before joining the bounty. I think if you are not greedy and verify bounty before joining, even if there are more participants, the payment will be better.

[ShowOff]

Yes, it all depends on the project, but we also have to see the amount of allocation given by the project to the bounty program, if the allocation is small and the project is good, then automatically the participants will get a little profit, because a good project will always be enlivened by participants bounty.

Usually the manager will limit the number of participant who will promote the bounty because the prize allocation is small. This will be an advantage for the participant who is accepted because the number of prize he will receive is still within a reasonable limit. The allocation of fund does not affect the burden and responsibility of the promotion participant. Therefore, participant restriction is required for campaign with small prize allocation.

[Paycoinzzz]

I Have Observed So Many Times That Article And Video Campaigns Have Less Participants While Hunters Feels It's Much Stressful And Brainstorming. Bounty Hunting Is All About Sacrificing Time, Energy, Data And Electricity. Now For You To Be A Good Hunter With High Rewards, You Have To Participate In Article And Video Campaigns Only, For Lower Ranks On Forum And Sometimes Signature Campaigns For Higher Ranks, Meanwhile Participating In Social Media Campaigns Gives Less Reward Because Of Many Participants. Try This And You Gonna Appreciate Me.

I know that Article campaigns and youtube campaigns will help me earn more money but my dedication will be much reduced.  I don't know how to write reviews and can't do YouTube, so it loses the quality of my work.  I've gotten used to chatting with members here, I still do better Signature and accept lower pay.

[TopTort777]

High quality Youtube videos, well-written articles, finding bugs and offer solutions, or creative campaigns are the ones that pays good (but not all, because it still depends on the market price, trading volume, etc.).
I never participate in social media campaigns anymore, as they pay too low. Just saying.

If I’m not confusing something, those who joined Oikos medium bounty campaign (task was to follow their account), got same amount of tokens as average quality video review.

Not always article of video campaigns are more profitable than simply retweeting or liking posts. Hunters must look on a budget given and number of participants already joined.

[Insomnia family]

like the projects managed by the bounty detective manager, the projects they offer have an average length of time, even up to 12 weeks I've joined before and only get $ 50 in 12 weeks. since then I started to stop and look for a project that I think is even better.

[0t3p0t]

It is really the matter of choice when it comes to bounty hunting because that is where we have to figure out what bounty we are capable of. If you are a content creator with enough subscribers and views then youtube campaign is for you. If you are good at writing articles then you can apply for that position with a decent payment. There's a lot more like signature and social media campaigns. But that does not guarantee legitimacy or whether the bounty program will ever pay us even when we have those skills. Some are legit but gives shit tokens, some run away and disappear. Bounty hunting nowadays is somewhere between 50/50 just a matter of luck if you got your tokens with potentials and of course value matters too. It is not about how many participants, it is how's the result of our invested time and efforts.

[kenelmark]

like the projects managed by the bounty detective manager, the projects they offer have an average length of time, even up to 12 weeks I've joined before and only get $ 50 in 12 weeks. since then I started to stop and look for a project that I think is even better.

If the duration is up to 12 weeks with the reward you get only $ 50, I think it is not worth the time you have spent promoting them, but you have also found a very wise step by stopping following the project from bounty detective.

[Gozie51]

I Have Observed So Many Times That Article And Video Campaigns Have Less Participants While Hunters Feels It's Much Stressful And Brainstorming. Bounty Hunting Is All About Sacrificing Time, Energy, Data And Electricity. Now For You To Be A Good Hunter With High Rewards, You Have To Participate In Article And Video Campaigns Only, For Lower Ranks On Forum And Sometimes Signature Campaigns For Higher Ranks, Meanwhile Participating In Social Media Campaigns Gives Less Reward Because Of Many Participants. Try This And You Gonna Appreciate Me.

Try this in a scamming system that seem to have taken over. Many hunters are now withdrawing interest to participate in bounty because of their negative experience. Nothing is more disappointing than being scammed after doing your part. Many bounty begin to introduce conditions after bounty end.

[AlexAtom]

No, it is almost impossible. You can't get huge reward in bounty when too many participants joined.
The campaign usually based on the stakes of the participants. So, if the participants are too many, then the rewards will split according the stakes they earned. We can get huge reward if the participants are few, and the reward is huge and can't be changed.

[ArIMy11]

At year 2017, I have joined lot of signature campaigns and I sometimes get mad to the manager because he/she do not limit the participants of the campaign. Sometimes it already 300 or 400 participants but still accept or even though the campaign is in its last week, it is still open for new participants. But even though there are lot of participants, the reward is still huge. The only unfair thing is that there are times that other participants get reward even though they did not do anything for the campaign. If those rewards goes to those who really deserve then it will be a bigger reward for them.
This year, I am happy that there are campaigns that limit the participants. It is also good because they can really monitor each of it.

[cute nmp]

Well I totally agree with you on this point joining social media campaign nowadays is mostly not worth it because of very high number of participants unlike before.The only advantage of social media campaigns is that it is very much easier for newbies who are new to the system.One can only get huge reward from article,signature and video campaigns which are much more stressful than media campaigns.

[tabas]

Well I totally agree with you on this point joining social media campaign nowadays is mostly not worth it because of very high number of participants unlike before.The only advantage of social media campaigns is that it is very much easier for newbies who are new to the system.One can only get huge reward from article,signature and video campaigns which are much more stressful than media campaigns.

Those bounties are really targeting their social media presence and that's why many are joining them because they have set up an easy requirement it.
By which is being joined by a lot of newbies because they can join it and it's not that strict at all.