Ban evasion

[marlboroza]

User mdikmetas is evading ban[1] with alt account mandown.

Account mandown joined Ferrum Network bounty (http://archive.is/TYDGj#selection-4665.12-4665.14):

#JOIN & #Proof of authentication
"Name" of Bounty Campaign: signature
Bitcointalk username: mandown
Bitcointalk profile link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2546135

...and used telegram @muratdikmetas as it is visible in spreadsheet:



Account mdikmetas used the same telegram several times:

3) Telegram @Username :  @muratdikmetas

Telegram username : @muratdikmetas

telegram : @muratdikmetas

Mod gang please ban account.
[1]Source for banned account: https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?id=1027102


UPDATE

More alt accounts found by YOSHIE: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5252368.msg54539717#msg54539717

[ChuckBuck]

I see that you left a neutral feedback for that account, why is it a neutral feedback? Normally, it would be negative feedback, right?
@mandown is participating in the 777coin signature campaign. It's strange that he participated in another bonus campaign. Anyway, it was a stupid act and he killed himself  Now, the account should be banned  Well

[marlboroza]

I see that you left a neutral feedback for that account, why is it a neutral feedback? Normally, it would be negative feedback, right?

I have been told that ban evasion is something for moderator/admin and negative is not good use of trust system in this case, so I am leaving neutral ratings to ban evaders lately.

[YOSHIE]

User mdikmetas is evading ban[1] with alt account mandown.

@mdikmetas, not only has two accounts, but @mdikmetas has 6 other accounts in this forum, 3 others have been banned and 3 others are still active.
They were also involved in cheating in the same campaign, in the past.

Note the address used by: @mdikmetas: 0x53188b6E686b3a94dCf67337A2714Ff15c91e627

Bitcointalk Username :mdikmetas
Bitcointalk Profile Link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1027102
Telegram User Name : @mdikmetas
ETH Address:0x53188b6E686b3a94dCf67337A2714Ff15c91e627

[ archive ]

Accounts Connected:

1. patlicanmoru (Archived)

Telegram username:@mdikmetas
ETH Address:0x53188b6E686b3a94dCf67337A2714Ff15c91e627

[ archive ]

Miscellaneous:

Topic: [BOUNTY] [AIRDROP]


Still the address used by; @mdikmetas: 0x0B084cCD3D099734Deb9DaEdaC02eE3FECc6f931

Post by: mdikmetas

Bitcointalk username: mdikmetas
telegram:  @muratdikmetas
ETH Adress: 0x0B084cCD3D099734Deb9DaEdaC02eE3FECc6f931

[ archive ]

Accounts Connected:

2. Fundalini (Archived)
3. vijayrocker13 (Archived)
4. hollwing (Active)

Bitcointalk username: Fundalini
ERC-20 wallet address: 0x0b084ccd3d099734deb9daedac02ee3fecc6f931

[ archive ]

Post by: vijayrocker13

Bitcointalk username: vijayrocker13
Telegram username : vijayrockzer
Bitcointalk URL :   https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=994315
Facebook URL :    https://www.facebook.com/vijayrockzer
REDDIT URL :     https://www.reddit.com/user/vijayrockzer
ETH Adress: 0x0B084cCD3D099734Deb9DaEdaC02eE3FECc6f931

[ archive ]

Bitcointalk User Name: hollwing
Ethereum Wallet Address:0x0b084ccd3d099734deb9daedac02ee3fecc6f931

[ archive ]


And this one is based on the ETH address used by: @vijayrocker13: 0x6080be5e13e3a017b9e477be59f0ce020f841568, and also twitter, telegram.

Proof Of Interest
Telegram Id: 374434238 (@vijayrockzer)
Twitter Profile Link: https://twitter.com/vijayrockzer
ETH Address: 0x6080be5e13e3a017b9e477be59f0ce020f841568

[ archive ]

Accounts Connected:

5. vijayrockzer (Active)
6. Peeranky09 (Active)

bitcointalk  username: vijayrockzer
telegram username: @vijayrockzer
eth address: 0x6080be5e13e3a017b9e477be59f0ce020f841568

[ archive ]

WEEK 1
Bitcointalk username: vijayrockzer
Your Facebook account url: https://www.facebook.com/peeranky

[ archive ]

Related Addresses:

Code:

ETH Adress: 0x0B084cCD3D099734Deb9DaEdaC02eE3FECc6f931
eth address: 0x6080be5e13e3a017b9e477be59f0ce020f841568
ETH Address:0x53188b6E686b3a94dCf67337A2714Ff15c91e627

[marlboroza]

^ I updated topic with your research, good catch. That's 8 accounts and 4 banned. On side note, seems wolwoo's merit source application topic is honeypot for ban evaders, I've found another one there, however, I don't have time to do further research so if you want to check it please do and post it in appropriate topic (not this one).

[wolwoo]

This topic is opened for threats and blackmail
The goal: to scare people and make them passive.

He is very active member. I hope you choose merit source for the Turkish section. Because at the moment there is one merit source Turkish section. I think , wolwo will be fair.   Good luck.

Makes me wonder, how the hell are you not banned??

good luck already.

I support @wolwo to be a source of merit.
I think it would be fair

Oh my, another ban evader wants wolwoo to become merit source! How is your alt account mdikmetas doing?

[suchmoon]

This topic is opened for threats and blackmail

You can say that marlboroza tortures little kittens but that doesn't make it true. This topic has plenty of evidence of ban evasion with multiple accounts. Your judgement is seriously flawed if you think that defending this user will help you with your merit source application.

[marlboroza]

This topic is opened for threats and blackmail

Where is threat and blackmail?

The goal: to scare people and make them passive.

The goal: to clean forum from bad actors. It is not my fault that ban evaders are shilling for you but it is OK to have place where someone can catch few of them, in this case, your merit source thread. I will keep watching that topic and every single idiot who start screaming "racist, terrorists" and some other keywords.

[wolwoo]

This topic is opened for threats and blackmail

You can say that marlboroza tortures little kittens but that doesn't make it true. This topic has plenty of evidence of ban evasion with multiple accounts. Your judgement is seriously flawed if you think that defending this user will help you with your merit source application.

See message time
See Topic opening time
Everything is clear

[marlboroza]

See message time
See Topic opening time
Everything is clear

Account was spotted
Under one ban evader
It is clear

Another ban evader
Is exposed
It is clear

More ban evaders
Will be exposed
It is clear.

Points you are trying to make
Have nothing to do
With reality.

Thanks for bumps
Admin will see
It is clear.

[wolwoo]

See message time
See Topic opening time
Everything is clear

Account was spotted
Under one ban evader
It is clear

Another ban evader
Is exposed
It is clear

More ban evaders
Will be exposed
It is clear.

Points you are trying to make
Have nothing to do
With reality.

Thanks for bumps
Admin will see
It is clear.

You are very funny! There were already titles you opened. Why did you open a title again when those support messages came?

[marlboroza]

There were already titles you opened.

Look, I don't want to turn this into whats up chat room but I have no idea what you are talking about, as far as I am concern this is first topic about account mdikmetas' ban evasion.

Why did you open a title again when those support messages came?

It would be impossible to open topic before investigation. Back-to-back posts, the same spelling mistake, similar wording:

He is very active member. I hope you choose merit source for the Turkish section. Because at the moment there is one merit source Turkish section. I think , wolwo will be fair.   Good luck.

good luck already.

I support @wolwo to be a source of merit.
I think it would be fair

I was familiar with account gumusi AKA otto_diesel from one of my previous researches and then another account jumps in out of nowhere and triggers my sixth sense, well, I was right and to be honest accounts gumusi/otto_diesel and mandown look like alt accounts.


My turn.

My research about otto_diesel triggered you and you start ranting because of it. Any reason why you are ranting in this topic as well?

[wolwoo]

There were already titles you opened.

Look, I don't want to turn this into whats up chat room but I have no idea what you are talking about, as far as I am concern this is first topic about account mdikmetas' ban evasion.

Why did you open a title again when those support messages came?

It would be impossible to open topic before investigation. Back-to-back posts, the same spelling mistake, similar wording:

He is very active member. I hope you choose merit source for the Turkish section. Because at the moment there is one merit source Turkish section. I think , wolwo will be fair.   Good luck.

good luck already.

I support @wolwo to be a source of merit.
I think it would be fair

I was familiar with account gumusi AKA otto_diesel from one of my previous researches and then another account jumps in out of nowhere and triggers my sixth sense, well, I was right and to be honest accounts gumusi/otto_diesel and mandown look like alt accounts.


My turn.

My research about otto_diesel triggered you and you start ranting because of it. Any reason why you are ranting in this topic as well?

prove it if i otto
You prove everyone, prove me too

I am not disturbed by your work. I am currently struggling with this in the Turkish local forum. I just want it to be fair. It is not double standard. The above members actively share every day. These people are real people, no harm to anyone, they have been writing for a long time. Leave them and find merit abuser multis, reveal.

[marlboroza]

Leave them and find merit abuser multis, reveal.

As you wish, give me an hour or so.

[yahoo62278]

I think we need to stop posting about ban evaders and bounty cheaters and showing them how they were caught. Instead maybe there should be a form we can provide all the proof in and report accounts that way?

All we are dong by showing the work is educating them on not getting caught in the future.

I would say use the report to moderator button, but that only allows so much info. Definitely not enough space for a whole report.

[suchmoon]

Can you make me a security investigation?
Do I have a multi account?
Do I have a banned account?
Or am I being pushed entirely because of subjective opinions?

This thread is not about you.

[Upgrade00]

I would say use the report to moderator button, but that only allows so much info. Definitely not enough space for a whole report.

I couldn't find a definite limit on the number of characters that can go into a report, but it seems to be large enough to take a whole report, with evidence. This thread were it was discussed by mods also suggests that.

The little bar space for the report, makes it appear that it can't take much characters, it would also not be user friendly to write a long report, as proofreading would be a hassle. A box to comment similar to what we use when making replies would be a better option.
However, maybe the idea was not to encourage long reports.