multi account questions

[wolwoo]

So what? As long as they're not breaking forum rules, bounty rules, and not engaging in untrustworthy actions (e.g. posting positive trust for each other) - they're fine. You seem to be focusing on the "winnings" (I assume you mean bounties) way too much. That's not what this forum is about. But if you're concerned about alts cheating bounties you can go ahead and work on exposing them. Bounty managers will be grateful.

How so? If we do, you lynch immediately. Accounts are negative only because they give trust. So let's all open 3-5-100 accounts, give them all separate btc addresses, and join all signatures. You cannot find a connection. Do you suggest this?

[suchmoon]

How so? If we do, you lynch immediately. Accounts are negative only because they give trust. So let's all open 3-5-100 accounts, give them all separate btc addresses, and join all signatures. You cannot find a connection. Do you suggest this?

If you do what? If you have alt accounts that's not a problem. If you cheat bounties or use alts to skew the trust system that's a problem. What you're saying ("open 3-5-100 accounts, give them all separate btc addresses, and join all signatures") would be technically ok, as long as you're joining different campaigns, in which case you don't even need to hide behind separate BTC addresses - you are not breaking any rules. But I doubt you would be able to make enough high-quality posts with so many accounts to make such a scheme worthwhile.

[Vispilio]

How so? If we do, you lynch immediately. Accounts are negative only because they give trust. So let's all open 3-5-100 accounts, give them all separate btc addresses, and join all signatures. You cannot find a connection. Do you suggest this?

If you do what? If you have alt accounts that's not a problem. If you cheat bounties or use alts to skew the trust system that's a problem. What you're saying ("open 3-5-100 accounts, give them all separate btc addresses, and join all signatures") would be technically ok, as long as you're joining different campaigns, in which case you don't even need to hide behind separate BTC addresses - you are not breaking any rules. But I doubt you would be able to make enough high-quality posts with so many accounts to make such a scheme worthwhile.

I presume most projects would prefer their bounty participants to exclusively represent their own brand throughout the campaign, at least on the media they are targeting, without dividing their time and efforts between multi accounts and multiple projects...

From that perspective, it's understandable if someone who has been joining multiple bounties with his alt accounts is still frowned upon and criticized / rejected by the campaign manager's discretion, even though it's not technically against the rules...

[suchmoon]

I presume most projects would prefer their bounty participants to exclusively represent their own brand throughout the campaign, at least on the media they are targeting, without dividing their time and efforts between multi accounts and multiple projects...

From that perspective, it's understandable if someone who has been joining multiple bounties with his alt accounts is still frowned upon and criticized / rejected by the campaign manager's discretion, even though it's not technically against the rules...

And...?

If a signature campaign wants to add such a rule (no alts in any other campaigns) they could just say so but I'm not aware of any that does this. If campaign managers want to control this at their own discretion - more power to them. What does this have to do with the OP?

[posi]

my opinion should not be opened sub account. However, when the rules of the forum are legal and the greed of people is combined, the chain of accounts emerges. People cannot jump rank because the number of merits is limited. Many new members who see this are moving away from the forum because it is hopeless.

Well that new rule can not be introduced now... May if it was right from the start when the forum was created. I think Theymos does not want to change the original tradition of the forum to a situation where there are too many restrictions when creating accounts. In fact, he too has an Alt.
If this is done, then he might as well end up introducing KYC one day 

The problem with the freedom of creating many accounts is that some people tend to abuse it but not everyone who has an alt abuses the forum. The abusers think they can get away with it but after a few years, their sins catch up with them.

If Theymos could respect people's privacy to the extent that he implemented doxing rules and regulations, I don't see him introducing KYC now or in the future but I believe there's no way an individual with multiple accounts won't abuse the forum freedom. Mind you, multiple account users are those in charge selling of forum account.

[Upgate]

So what? As long as they're not breaking forum rules, bounty rules, and not engaging in untrustworthy actions (e.g. posting positive trust for each other) - they're fine. You seem to be focusing on the "winnings" (I assume you mean bounties) way too much. That's not what this forum is about. But if you're concerned about alts cheating bounties you can go ahead and work on exposing them. Bounty managers will be grateful.

How so? If we do, you lynch immediately. Accounts are negative only because they give trust. So let's all open 3-5-100 accounts, give them all separate btc addresses, and join all signatures. You cannot find a connection. Do you suggest this?

Opening about 3-5 account is quite easy and simple. The problem will be, will you be able to meet up with their posting task (10+15) every week? Without posting and giving the same suggestions in the same thread. It's quite stressful for you not to be caught

[JeromeTash]

My opinion here is that many people have multi accounts. But they are not caught.
For example: You open a separate btc / eth address for each account. You send your winnings to the stock market and sell.

Let them open multiple accounts and cheat if they want. But, one time they will slip up, they always do, and that's when they will get caught. The fact is you can never make every member here to do the right thing. There will always be abusers/cheats whether you want Admins to make strict rules on multiple accounts or not.

In order to try to fight multiple accounts, it would mean introducing the much loathed document verification which would be the one of the worst thing to be done on a forum like this one.

Take a look at the casinos that have the right to implement KYC at any time, most do not allow multiple accounts but people still abuse the platforms just to get that sign up bonus. Where there is money involved, abusers will be there no matter what restrictions they put in place.

[Timelord2o67]

I must be the only one to have noticed the two UID's in the thread's third post both changed their passwords on the 29th of June 2018.