Devs please have some respect

[michellee]

Bounty hunters are marketers who later will turn investors. I have personally held some altcoin I got from bounty, and even invest more on the project when I see how good the project is and that I got just small tokens from campaign. More so developers are suppose to give to hunters what won't have a bad impact on their market and it's the right of hunters to receive payment.

True! However, a lot of devs are doing the opposite thing. They reward bounty hunters at a lower rate than usual and expect them to follow along with their project. Once the project can't hit its target, they turn to blame us all. Personally, I don't usually feel comfortable working with people who have a bad work ethic like that lol!

That happens much time, and we don't have to think about that. People already help them to promote their project in many ways, and in the end, they blame people because they dump their token in a second once the token gets the list. Well, that is not good for the project. After all, they can lose the opportunity to gain more people to support their project because they are blaming people who help them before. People out there will see who they are, and they will think twice to support them.

[1715578556]

1715578556

[1715578556]

1715578556

[1715578556]

1715578556

[1715578556]

1715578556

[1715578556]

1715578556

[1715578556]

1715578556

[X-ray]

Developers needs to start taking their project very seriously, it's one reason why I don't promote projects that give away too many coins, it means there will be huge dump and the coin will lose value, this is call mismanagement

The problem is they didn't have a lot of skill to develop their projects they will be asking for the money while it can be done for free as long as people has enough skill to developer an innovative idea like satoshi did in the past.
It's very difficult to change this perspective.

[kotajikikox]

It seems developers don't know what they are doing, many of them that put blames on bounty hunters for price dump , they must be high on drugs or something, this is just simple arithmetic

A devs create a coin with 100 million supply

He decide to do IEO with 50 million coins of the supply

He decide to do IEO at the price of 0.1$

But to attract investors he introduce a discount of 0.05$

He was lucky to see many investors investing in the project even when he chooses not so good exchange

And price surge over 3.5$

Please tell me, how will investors hold the coins when they see gains that can take them years of holding to achieve???

Developers you are the main problem affecting your coins and tokens, bounty hunters only share up to 1% of your max supply, have some respect

Great points here,seems that Hunters has their defense attorney now here ,because all these years blames always goes to the Bounty hunters even if they have just received the payments after investors sold their tokens.

I think the best solution here?bounty hunters stop joining instead find their other way to make profits here in crypto because the Bounty Days are long gone now.

[Byakuga]

It's a big sign, any project that throws blame on bounty hunter means they don't know what they are doing, I advise to dump such project instantly and move to better one who can actually face any situation either good or bad

[isaac_clarke22]

Well we can't avoid that kind of mindset.
Some devs might think of bounty hunters as some hungry people to feed because they didn't even invest any single quarter into their project aside from time that's why bounty hunters are the ones being blamed commonly in the first place unlike investors of the project itself.

[naikturun]

when they can use hunter as a reason why not, it applies to devs who have bad projects and don't have definite development on their projects.
while good projects they will continue to focus and not blame any party for the failure / decline in their project performance.

[FireBallex]

Lame people blame people, if the team are pro thy don't have to blame anything for their failure, instead they will give in more effort to fix this up and that's what I called a good team, today new devs with no pro history build tokens and steal others whitepaper to complete their lame projects, it's always money here money there, we just need to me extra careful

[Towerbreeze]

Team are responsible for the value of their coin, if they give them away easily to attract investors the end result will be pretty bad, I expect many developers to have learned by now because we have so many examples of projects that took this unfavorable path in the past

[bearexin]

Lol I'm happy that someone finally took out the time to address this issue the way it's meant to be.
I was seeing some topics on this lately. The op was asking whether we should blame the investors or the bounty hunters for a failed project.

I just don't see why we should be blaming the bounty hunters, because they have never done anything wrong by helping to push the project. When developers create a project, their reason for calling on bounty hunters is to help push that project and nothing else. People needs to understand that bounty hunters are not investors. They have done their part of the work and you can't tie them down forever and believing that will make your project to grow. Wrong.

[Mealea]

Discount is a way of attracting potential investor especially with the present state of the market. Every developer are trying everything possible to attract investors. Blaming bounty hunters is a way of escaping from the wrath of investors in the case of price dumb.

[enhu]

Discount is a way of attracting potential investor especially with the present state of the market. Every developer are trying everything possible to attract investors. Blaming bounty hunters is a way of escaping from the wrath of investors in the case of price dumb.

This is what usually happens and they who got discounts are the one who normally sells to profit. The bounty hunters don't even get the tokens yet as their rewards while the price hits the sediment already so why blame the bounty hunters?  Blaming is easy and gets them off the hook with just a word of it when the fact is that these developers also are the ones dumping the first.

[Vishnu.Reang]

I have been saying this for quite sometime. The developers and the promoters need to show respect for bounty hunters. For just 0.5% or 1% of the total pool, the bounty hunters are doing the hard work to promote these projects. And if the project becomes a success, then the bounty hunter may receive $10 or $20 worth of tokens, while the promoters may each receive tokens worth millions of USD.

[gundala]

I have been saying this for quite sometime. The developers and the promoters need to show respect for bounty hunters. For just 0.5% or 1% of the total pool, the bounty hunters are doing the hard work to promote these projects. And if the project becomes a success, then the bounty hunter may receive $10 or $20 worth of tokens, while the promoters may each receive tokens worth millions of USD.

This scenario will succeed if the project is really good. The dev team should also determine the right marketing strategy. If indeed they are doubtful and difficult to form market trust, they should give another reward, for example in BTC or USDT. It could also compile a strategy by giving weekly rewards, even if it is still difficult, please do the payment in several stages, for example once a month, but it was informed from the beginning. So that the bounty hunter is not disappointed. Often, when a product is successful in a high-priced market, the bounty hunter is forgotten and there is drama, changes in payments begin, delays, rewards are locked, etc.

[Lagduf]

Team are responsible for the value of their coin, if they give them away easily to attract investors the end result will be pretty bad, I expect many developers to have learned by now because we have so many examples of projects that took this unfavorable path in the past

They have gotten big amounts of money and that's their responsibility to create cooperation with big exchange site or provide a good development when all of the things will be synched and then it will bring a lot of demand that will build the liquidity because this is the main aim for any project. The hunters are not something that must be blamed by the dev.

[@baoli]

Thank you for this. The other day, l made a comment about transparency. You can't be mentioning millions when you know you didn't even raise 200k dollars. So it is with supply and so call private sell. Dev will hold back to a declare selling 50% at private sell.

[winterlemon912]

It seems developers don't know what they are doing, many of them that put blames on bounty hunters for price dump , they must be high on drugs or something, this is just simple arithmetic

A devs create a coin with 100 million supply

He decide to do IEO with 50 million coins of the supply

He decide to do IEO at the price of 0.1$

But to attract investors he introduce a discount of 0.05$

He was lucky to see many investors investing in the project even when he chooses not so good exchange

And price surge over 3.5$

Please tell me, how will investors hold the coins when they see gains that can take them years of holding to achieve???

Developers you are the main problem affecting your coins and tokens, bounty hunters only share up to 1% of your max supply, have some respect

I think that you are right and I think that they should always have respect for other and not put the blame into the bounty hunters and I think that they are the ones that is in fault and not those bounty hunters becsuse they are becoming greedy unlike those bounty hunters that is doing things in order for them to survive and sa earn money in cryptocurrencies and the devs are being disrespectful to them but bounty hunters are not doing anything because they are not that greedy unlike those devs and I think that they should open their eye  to the reality of cryptocurrencies

[skeleto88]

I have been saying this for quite sometime. The developers and the promoters need to show respect for bounty hunters. For just 0.5% or 1% of the total pool, the bounty hunters are doing the hard work to promote these projects. And if the project becomes a success, then the bounty hunter may receive $10 or $20 worth of tokens, while the promoters may each receive tokens worth millions of USD.

Or maybe they are only relying to bounty hunters to promote their projects which certainly not gonna work alone. They must make their own promotions in order to attract or why investors should consider investing in the project or else it would turn into a flop and the bounty hunter will take all the blame.

[kceekcee]

It seems developers don't know what they are doing, many of them that put blames on bounty hunters for price dump , they must be high on drugs or something, this is just simple arithmetic

A devs create a coin with 100 million supply

He decide to do IEO with 50 million coins of the supply

He decide to do IEO at the price of 0.1$

But to attract investors he introduce a discount of 0.05$

He was lucky to see many investors investing in the project even when he chooses not so good exchange

And price surge over 3.5$

Please tell me, how will investors hold the coins when they see gains that can take them years of holding to achieve???

Developers you are the main problem affecting your coins and tokens, bounty hunters only share up to 1% of your max supply, have some respect

It is hard to influence devs on this crypto currency space.
And likewise, you cannot force decisions upon them.

This is why we have a choice to make our researches and invest in tokens we believe are worth while and worthy to invest.

You don't need to drool about a project, figure out if it works or move on

[distr@yopmail.com]

I have been saying this for quite sometime. The developers and the promoters need to show respect for bounty hunters. For just 0.5% or 1% of the total pool, the bounty hunters are doing the hard work to promote these projects. And if the project becomes a success, then the bounty hunter may receive $10 or $20 worth of tokens, while the promoters may each receive tokens worth millions of USD.

Or maybe they are only relying to bounty hunters to promote their projects which certainly not gonna work alone. They must make their own promotions in order to attract or why investors should consider investing in the project or else it would turn into a flop and the bounty hunter will take all the blame.

I don't think promotion with Bounty Hunter will be effective. marketing using other methods may be more effective, of course, must be adjusted to the market of the product to be released. until now I think bounty hunters will be very helpful in increasing daily trading volume when entering the market. large community with the small value I think it would be good to increase the daily trading of a new product in the market.

[elisabetheva]

I have been saying this for quite sometime. The developers and the promoters need to show respect for bounty hunters. For just 0.5% or 1% of the total pool, the bounty hunters are doing the hard work to promote these projects. And if the project becomes a success, then the bounty hunter may receive $10 or $20 worth of tokens, while the promoters may each receive tokens worth millions of USD.

Or maybe they are only relying to bounty hunters to promote their projects which certainly not gonna work alone. They must make their own promotions in order to attract or why investors should consider investing in the project or else it would turn into a flop and the bounty hunter will take all the blame.

It seems that the calculation transparency makes it unreliable with so many naughty ones to make profits and give the bounty to the smallest part of the bounty hunter. cooperation is really needed and openness in managing the results obtained, but this never happened and all can be ascertained bounty hunter who remain disadvantaged. indeed a small portion plus fraud made so that what is obtained has no value anymore.