Scam accusations against SupremosKaiosama (alt of Humbertin)

[suchmoon]

I've always been able to have good conversations with you, so you tell me: Would it sit more comfortably with you if my trust feedback of Webtricks were NEUTRAL instead of negative in that I would not trust this person to do a trade with?

This didn't require any trust ratings from you, let alone attempts to fabricate your own "proof" based on timezones. You should just stay out of things you don't understand but when has common sense ever stopped you from being an blithering idiot. Now you have a chance to whine about "abuse" again, congrats.

[1714893488]

1714893488

[1714893488]

1714893488

[1714893488]

1714893488

[Timelord2067]

...

You are mistaken.

blackjack.fun came up with the timezones as proof.

[suchmoon]

You are mistaken.

blackjack.fun came up with the timezones as proof.

No, they didn't. They showed some details of two browser fingerprints with timezones half the world away from each other and you tried to fabricate "proof" out of it.

Not to mention that there was nothing urgent about the situation to require immediate trust ratings. Nobody was attempting to scam anyone.

[Timelord2067]

... still in denial about the world around them ...

Wrong again.

blackjack.fun came up with the time-zones as proof.

LoyceV observed there was a discrepancy in the time zones.

I gave a break down of those time zones and their geographical locations.  (scroll up - it's in this thread)

[suchmoon]

blackjack.fun came up with the time-zones as proof.

LoyceV observed there was a discrepancy in the time zones.

I gave a break down of those time zones and their geographical locations.  (scroll up - it's in this thread)

Will you stop with this nonsense... here is the original post: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5106215.msg55809084#msg55809084

Nowhere does it say that timezone is the proof. LoyceV highlighted mismatched languages and timezones. You took that post and flipped it upside down as if those timezones prove something. They don't. Never did. Nobody except you claimed that they do. Have some dignity and own your words FFS.

[LoyceV]

LoyceV observed there was a discrepancy in the time zones.

The discrepancy was in the evidence, not the time zones.

so you tell me: Would it sit more comfortably with you if my trust feedback of Webtricks were NEUTRAL instead of negative in that I would not trust this person to do a trade with?

Yes.

Webtricks first action by their own admission was to retaliatory DT distrust me - i.e. shoot first then ask questions later.

Why do you even call it retaliation? If someone leaves me unwarranted negative feedback, I'll probably exclude them too. If someone shows bad judgement, excluding them is the correct way to use the Trust system.

I'll share what I've posted before: before giving someone negative feedback, ask yourself: does this make the forum a better place? I've seen far too many negative feedbacks that don't meet this simple requirement!

[Timelord2067]

Webtricks first action by their own admission was to retaliatory DT distrust me - i.e. shoot first then ask questions later.

Why do you even call it retaliation?

Read the link that you've quoted and you will see that it's their words, not mine (self admitted retaliatory DT trust)

[webtricksALT]

I think my following words are being misunderstood so I will rephrase them just for the clarification:

I know it isn't considered wise to leave retaliatory feedback but I think you deserve at least neutral feedback for coming up with this shit and wasting my time.

"I know it isn't considered wise to leave retaliatory feedback so I won't be leaving one but I think you deserve at least neutral feedback for coming up with this shit and wasting my time. "

I only consider negative for negative feedback as the retaliatory one. So me leaving you (@Timelord2067) neutral trust for your negative feedback wasn't retaliatory at all. It was the feedback on your poor judgement on detecting alts which eventually turned out to be true because you changed your feedback from 'red' to 'neutral' in my case and soon you gonna remove it completely when blackjack.fun will fail to provide any proof (provided if you are rational at all).

And as far as adding you to my distrust list is concerned, 'Trust List' is a private list of every member. Every member has complete right to add whoever he thinks is good in giving trustworthy feedback or bad when it comes to leaving feedback. Me adding you to my distrust list has no direct impact on forum reputation so there is nothing for you to complain about. And you ranting about it and further giving me red trust does nothing but justify why I added you to my distrust list.

[LoyceV]

"I know it isn't considered wise to leave retaliatory feedback so I won't be leaving one but I think you deserve at least neutral feedback for coming up with this shit and wasting my time. "

That's how I handle similar cases too:

[Timelord2067]

I'll share what I've posted before: before giving someone negative feedback, ask yourself: does this make the forum a better place? I've seen far too many negative feedbacks that don't meet this simple requirement!

You started this thread with the express hope that others would give the accused negative trust feedback, and they have obliged you:

(all four lines of "evidence" - ironically, you write: "There's no direct evidence" and yet these people gave the UID negative anyway on the basis there was no "evidence")

gunzz9xp

2020-06-05

he scam me 20usd for netflix account. then delete all the telegram chat

Avirunes

2020-06-06

Reference

Alt. of scammer Humbertin. Avoid dealing with this user.

nutildah

2020-06-06

Reference

alt of scammer Humbertin19_, HumberBaccarat, TimesSquareNY, GoldenBuzzers, and many others

marlboroza

2020-06-06

Reference

Long term scammer.

gunzz9xp

2020-06-08

Netflix Scammer alert 🔥🔥beware, he will leave negative feedback on you after he scam u

Zabulus

2020-07-28

scammer

Now you want to frown at me because I have done the exact same thing these people have done?  That doesn't wash, not with me, not with anyone.

If these people were truthful, they will all admit they took your word and "evidence" (remember you yourself say there is no "evidence") and have then proceeded to give the accused negative trust feedback on the basis of your word. (If they were truthful that is)

Well, that's exactly what I did, took the word of a user who has placed the reputation of their entire website on the line when they presented their evidence.

You people are still stressing out over trust feedback that was changed to NEUTRAL more than 24 hours ago and now you are frowning because I have said in trust feedback that I would not trust this user in a trade?

Really?

[suchmoon]

I would not trust this user in a trade?

Negative trust rating is for high risk in a trade. You not trusting someone because they excluded you doesn't necessarily mean high risk. It might seem high risk to you and you may feel justified posting such feedback... and you will likely get excluded even more by others who see it as sour grapes.

[LoyceV]

You started this thread with the express hope that others would give the accused negative trust feedback

Please don't make up things about me. I started this topic for 2 reasons:

I'll use this topic for a neutral Reference tag.

If anyone wants to dig deeper

(all four lines of "evidence" - ironically, you write: "There's no direct evidence" and yet these people gave the UID negative anyway on the basis there was no "evidence")

Or maybe they based it on further posts in the topic. For instance:

Yep, its Humbertin

[sujonali1819]

Username Hello I am Humb
My winning amount: 0.00915 BTC

Username Hello I am Humb
Deposited 0.002 btc
Withdraw winning: 0.014 btc

1. http://archive.fo/wip/kGnSw
2. http://archive.fo/7e1IO

Another account of  SupremosKaiosama. The user first tried to cheat the blackjack.fun winning contest with the fake winning amount. And now he comes again with another bitcointalk account PIBWORLD (though the winning amount is correct this time)

Sorry for bumping the thread again.

Humbertin is still active, still trying to scam,

https://prnt.sc/1WzAP3IkO6Ae

Username Hello I am Humb

archive: https://web.archive.org/web/20220928142605/https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5413669.msg61024462


Nothing to say more, Just a warning and quoting for reference

[LoyceV]

Humbertin is still active, still trying to scam,

https://prnt.sc/1WzAP3IkO6Ae

Username Hello I am Humb

It's amazing he still uses the same well-known name to scam.

[Timelord2067]

Humbertin also uses the phrase

Code:

hellow

as I have referenced in my numerous reports concerning this scammer and have had that phrase in my list of keywords since at least January this year.

See also

https://loyce.club/badposts/
https://loyce.club/badposts/other.html


PalermoMoon was Date Registered:    2022-08-08, 14:31:45

Mwinami uses Hellow on the August 18, 2022, 05:57:54 PM to seek a $1000 USD loan. (and was Last Active:    2022-08-22, 06:58:34 )

on the 2022-08-26 PalermoMoon is active trading accounts

jakamin

2022-08-26

Reference

(Created flag)

jakamin

2022-08-26

Reference

Scammer , not paid one account

and today is active on the forum

It might be a thin connection, however, they (Mwinami and PalermoMoon) were both active within a week of each other using the same turn of phrase Humbertin uses.