Blockchain.com recorded two transactions that have
1AHMbmAdB3DmWFVcKo7i8d19ZD6DNY2Nsy as the output.
One was cancelled out because it spent the same inputs of the other one, reason? The first one was double-spent, probably RBF~ed.
That explains the "2" received transactions despite having one.
Here's the evidence:
c85eb26baf86dc6c77d272f0b1f7f397d40965fcc47db05c74971f1fcab181beCurrently, blockcypher has been flagging it as "
double-spend attempt" (
it will be removed after a while).
WARNING: This transaction had an attempted double-spent by a9cca695290298fe93c704f529a4960…, but was still confirmed.