Not all new project team can afford top exchanges

[BuNga_cute]

It is true that IEO projects are far better compared to ICO projects, but the success of IEO projects depends on exchanges.
If it is not listed on the top exchanges, it is indeed quite difficult to attract investors and also the reality is not all IEO projects
can afford top exchanges. That becomes a serious problem to raise funds, no need to worry that every problem there is a way out.
Actually there are several ways to raise funds, one of them by creating a bounty campaign. In my opinion quite effective promotion
with bounty campaign to raise funds.

[bison]

I'm glad we have IEO for new projects to raise funds successful after ICO did lots of damages to investors trust but that's not all, I want something that can help new upcoming projects to raise funds easily, for IEO if you don't have enough money for top exchanges there is 70% chances that you will come out with a bad result...

What do you think could solve this? New Fund raising?

I still go for the project's potential and what it can bring to the market, going to the top exchange is a good option for a new project but if it has a hard time with the listing fee and the cost, he can opt for a much cheaper exchange while building his reputation and developing the project.

the top exchange is the best decision for a new project to strengthen its market from the start. but when listed on a cheaper exchange it will make their market very easy to collapse. the considerations depend on how they make their markets grow and not fall. because for new projects that experience bad market conditions it will be very difficult to control their markets.

[Kunnu]

I always believe that the quality of project determines its future, these days crypto community is smart enough they don't want to be involve in a pump and dump project anymore unfortunately some big exchanges are doing this just for making money and their popularity attracts people to get involve in their provided ieo I have seen many quality projects ieo on some small exchanges which was unsuccessful because people are addicted to trust on the ieo of big exchanges and I don't think it will change.

[CuriousGeorge]

I'm glad we have IEO for new projects to raise funds successful after ICO did lots of damages to investors trust but that's not all, I want something that can help new upcoming projects to raise funds easily, for IEO if you don't have enough money for top exchanges there is 70% chances that you will come out with a bad result...

What do you think could solve this? New Fund raising?

I still go for the project's potential and what it can bring to the market, going to the top exchange is a good option for a new project but if it has a hard time with the listing fee and the cost, he can opt for a much cheaper exchange while building his reputation and developing the project.

the top exchange is the best decision for a new project to strengthen its market from the start. but when listed on a cheaper exchange it will make their market very easy to collapse. the considerations depend on how they make their markets grow and not fall. because for new projects that experience bad market conditions it will be very difficult to control their markets.

It's the best choice but it needs a lot of money. Binance charges more than 3 million dollars for a new token to be listed on binance exchange site. Some projects were raising a lot of money able to do this but the small projects can't

[_IRMAN]

Binance charges more than 3 million dollars for a new token to be listed on binance exchange site. Some projects were raising a lot of money able to do this but the small projects can't

Really ? How do you know that? I don't think binance has ever talked about listing prices to the public, I see a few coins listing in binance and their volume is not up to 3 million dollars per day, so I think $3 million just for listing is too expensive.

[andycarrol]

I always believe that the quality of project determines its future, these days crypto community is smart enough they don't want to be involve in a pump and dump project anymore unfortunately some big exchanges are doing this just for making money and their popularity attracts people to get involve in their provided ieo I have seen many quality projects ieo on some small exchanges which was unsuccessful because people are addicted to trust on the ieo of big exchanges and I don't think it will change.

indeed, only the place of exchange that has a good reputation will still be used to do IEO because they are risking the good name of the place of exchange to provide information about coin offers through the IEO method, so when they want to give IEO, the place of exchange must be truly selective.

[leea-1334]

Binance charges more than 3 million dollars for a new token to be listed on binance exchange site. Some projects were raising a lot of money able to do this but the small projects can't

Really ? How do you know that? I don't think binance has ever talked about listing prices to the public, I see a few coins listing in binance and their volume is not up to 3 million dollars per day, so I think $3 million just for listing is too expensive.

Look it up,,, they have talked about it but their claim is that they never charge any listing fees at all, they instead call it management fees to charge for the work and due diligence.

Bullshit mainly as I myself have seen replies from exchanges including Binance in the past. Maybe now they are not so blatant about it!

[rodskee]

I always believe that the quality of project determines its future, these days crypto community is smart enough they don't want to be involve in a pump and dump project anymore unfortunately some big exchanges are doing this just for making money and their popularity attracts people to get involve in their provided ieo I have seen many quality projects ieo on some small exchanges which was unsuccessful because people are addicted to trust on the ieo of big exchanges and I don't think it will change.

indeed, only the place of exchange that has a good reputation will still be used to do IEO because they are risking the good name of the place of exchange to provide information about coin offers through the IEO method, so when they want to give IEO, the place of exchange must be truly selective.

That's how investors see opportunities, once IEO being offered to a good exchange many will participates and take
part, while if the project being held to unknown exchange
Only small support or most of the time it won't be supported, it's a mentality that circulating around this industry
good exchange gives reputations to introductory project.
Nowadays, if the team don't have enough funds to compete placing their project to a well known exchange the chance
of surviving is really small, they needed to plan very well
before taking part to this business.

[irixo10]

I'm glad we have IEO for new projects to raise funds successful after ICO did lots of damages to investors trust but that's not all, I want something that can help new upcoming projects to raise funds easily, for IEO if you don't have enough money for top exchanges there is 70% chances that you will come out with a bad result...

What do you think could solve this? New Fund raising?

That is true and no one expects them or makes it mandatory for them to list on top exchanges as a start but if they have the funds and still wishes to then it's a welcome idea. In my own opinion, the first thing that matters is what the project is bringing, once it is a good one and the team have shown their eagerness to keep working then going for medium exchanges will also help to give them a good result because every exchange appreciates good projects. So in essence, if a project don't have the neccessary funds for top exchanges they should list out other medium exchanges that falls within their expectations, then narrow it down by comparing the success rate of IEO on those exchanges, this I think will help them make the right choice.

[Ifemini]

I'm glad we have IEO for new projects to raise funds successful after ICO did lots of damages to investors trust but that's not all, I want something that can help new upcoming projects to raise funds easily, for IEO if you don't have enough money for top exchanges there is 70% chances that you will come out with a bad result...

What do you think could solve this? New Fund raising?

This is a true perspective when we consider new projects, but if all new projects cannot afford top exchanges, then they should avoid mediocre exchange platforms because it totally ruins the project without a hope of resurrecting.

To solve this, projects need to be patient before delving into crowdfunding situations, get into the best exchange for their ieo and that lays a good foundation for success

[cryptofirm]

It is true that IEO projects are far better compared to ICO projects, but the success of IEO projects depends on exchanges.
If it is not listed on the top exchanges, it is indeed quite difficult to attract investors and also the reality is not all IEO projects
can afford top exchanges. That becomes a serious problem to raise funds, no need to worry that every problem there is a way out.
Actually there are several ways to raise funds, one of them by creating a bounty campaign. In my opinion quite effective promotion
with bounty campaign to raise funds.

i think for now if we comparing ICO and IEO is not fair mate
anyway if we look back, a lot of big project born from ICO,, and tradeable on top exchange too
i hope someday the glory of ICO will coming back in crypto space

[bluebit25]

I believe all the new projects that I want are listed in the top exchanges in this market, but to be listed there is very difficult. They need to spend a lot of money on listing fees, and their project must be really good and have a large community of support. It is really too difficult for new projects

[ife2020]

One prominent issue with some project team is that they see a top exchange platform as the pinnacle of suceess for their crypto currency projects.

A good exchange platform for a nee project should be an icing on a cake which the project will thrive upon, it should not be otherwise.
listing onntop exchange does not equal good price which is why work should be done on the project product to experience good returns

[Taufik blackspade team]

i think for now if we comparing ICO and IEO is not fair mate
anyway if we look back, a lot of big project born from ICO,, and tradeable on top exchange too
i hope someday the glory of ICO will coming back in crypto space

time has passed. each system has its period. ICO with their glory and IEO also with their current glory. we will not compare it all because after all ICO gave birth to many big projects as well.

[Ann Impas]

Being listed on a exchange as an coin isn't all about the money. Exchanges also look at the reputation of the project. Because if they don't and the coin turns out to be a scam then that exchange that listed it will face the consequence. So if you look at Binance the coins there is quality. Because you need money and trust to get listed.

[Psynthax]

Being listed on a exchange as an coin isn't all about the money. Exchanges also look at the reputation of the project. Because if they don't and the coin turns out to be a scam then that exchange that listed it will face the consequence. So if you look at Binance the coins there is quality. Because you need money and trust to get listed.

that's true but that needs a lot of qualifications especially from the product must be audited but the agreement between the exchange and dev will also discuss how much fees that must be paid by the team as a part of requirements.

[ElmedoRator]

Being listed on a exchange as an coin isn't all about the money. Exchanges also look at the reputation of the project. Because if they don't and the coin turns out to be a scam then that exchange that listed it will face the consequence. So if you look at Binance the coins there is quality. Because you need money and trust to get listed.

As far as I know it is difficult to be listed at Binance, they have a strict process for selecting new projects. In addition to the fees listed there are very expensive, I heard some people say they need to pay $ 2 million to be listed if the project meets their requirements.

[OasisDre]

If new projects can't afford listing money for top exchanges they should find less costly exchanges, this doesn't mean the project will end up badly, the success of a project depends on the team professionalism

[Samayuki]

Being listed on a exchange as an coin isn't all about the money. Exchanges also look at the reputation of the project. Because if they don't and the coin turns out to be a scam then that exchange that listed it will face the consequence. So if you look at Binance the coins there is quality. Because you need money and trust to get listed.

As far as I know it is difficult to be listed at Binance, they have a strict process for selecting new projects. In addition to the fees listed there are very expensive, I heard some people say they need to pay $ 2 million to be listed if the project meets their requirements.

Binance is not a must for new projects, many projects don't get listed on binance and they are performing very well than binance listed projects, just find good exchange with zero fake volume and focus on future development to rise up your project

[ije07]

can be said that the reputation of the ICO has been bad, most investors are currently reluctant to invest in ICO again for several reasons including the risk of losing money in the ICO. but I think the presence of IEO slightly reduces the risk of fraud and is good for IEO who can do funding at the top exchanges like Binance or Okex.